The branch page for blender project will take 6s because calculating
divergence is very slow.
This PR will add a cache for the branch divergence calculation. So when
the second visit the branch list, it will take only less 200ms.
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.
---
## Current webhook flow
1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request
This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.
Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request
So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.
## Consequences of the refactor
- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)
So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).
Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.
As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go`
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
Consider executable files as a valid case when returning a DownloadURL for them.
They are just regular files with the difference being the executable permission bit being set.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
After repository commit status has been introduced on dashaboard, the
most top SQL comes from `GetLatestCommitStatusForPairs`.
This PR adds a cache for the repository's default branch's latest
combined commit status. When a new commit status updated, the cache will
be marked as invalid.
<img width="998" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/76759de7-3a83-4d54-8571-278f5422aed3">
Unlike other async processing in the queue, we should sync branches to
the DB immediately when handling git hook calling. If it fails, users
can see the error message in the output of the git command.
It can avoid potential inconsistency issues, and help #29494.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This PR made the code simpler, reduced unnecessary database queries and
fixed some warnning for the errors.New .
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Also resolves a warning for current releases
```
| ##[group]GitHub Actions runtime token ACs
| ##[warning]Cannot parse GitHub Actions Runtime Token ACs: "undefined" is not valid JSON
| ##[endgroup]
====>
| ##[group]GitHub Actions runtime token ACs
| ##[endgroup]
```
\* this is an error in v3
References in the docker org:
-
831ca179d3/src/main.ts (L24)
-
7d8b4dc669/src/github.ts (L61)
No known official action of GitHub makes use of this claim.
Current releases throw an error when configure to use actions cache
```
| ERROR: failed to solve: failed to configure gha cache exporter: invalid token without access controls
| ##[error]buildx failed with: ERROR: failed to solve: failed to configure gha cache exporter: invalid token without access controls
```
Part of #23318
Add menu in repo settings to allow for repo admin to decide not just if
projects are enabled or disabled per repo, but also which kind of
projects (repo-level/owner-level) are enabled. If repo projects
disabled, don't show the projects tab.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/29498
I don't quite understand this code, but this change does seem to fix the
issue and I tested a number of diffs with it and saw no issue. The
function gets such value if last line is an addition:
```
LastLeftIdx: (int) 0,
LastRightIdx: (int) 47,
LeftIdx: (int) 47,
RightIdx: (int) 48,
```
If it's a deletion, it gets:
```
LastLeftIdx: (int) 47,
LastRightIdx: (int) 0,
LeftIdx: (int) 48,
RightIdx: (int) 47,
```
So I think it's correct to make this check respect both left and right
side.
1. Fix incorrect `HookEventType` for issue-related events in
`IssueChangeAssignee`
2. Add `case "types"` in the `switch` block in `matchPullRequestEvent`
to avoid warning logs
Since `modules/context` has to depend on `models` and many other
packages, it should be moved from `modules/context` to
`services/context` according to design principles. There is no logic
code change on this PR, only move packages.
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/context` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context`
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/contexttest` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/contexttest` because of depending on
context
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/upload` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context/upload` because of depending on
context
Some specific events on Gitlab issues and merge requests are stored
separately from comments as "resource state events". With this change,
all relevant resource state events are downloaded during issue and merge
request migration, and converted to comments.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these types.
ref: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/resource_state_events.html
Fixes#26691
Revert #24972
The alpine package manager expects `noarch` packages in the index of
other architectures too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Fix#14459
The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit
