Commit Graph

95 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
wxiaoguang
43de021ac1
Add test for webhook (#29755)
Follow #29690
2024-03-14 01:10:51 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
6e8762f962
Fix broken webhooks (#29690)
Fix #29689
2024-03-10 01:32:48 +00:00
oliverpool
26653b196b
Store webhook event in database (#29145)
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.

---

## Current webhook flow

1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request

This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.

Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request

So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.

## Consequences of the refactor

- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)

So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).

Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.

As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go` 
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
2024-03-07 23:18:38 +01:00
6543
a3f05d0d98
remove util.OptionalBool and related functions (#29513)
and migrate affected code

_last refactoring bits to replace **util.OptionalBool** with
**optional.Option[bool]**_
2024-03-02 16:42:31 +01:00
KN4CK3R
f79c9e817a
Use crypto/sha256 (#29386)
Go 1.21 improved the performance of `crypto/sha256`. It's now similar to
`minio/sha256-simd`, so we should just use the standard libs.

https://go.dev/doc/go1.21#crypto/sha256
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/408795
https://github.com/multiformats/go-multihash/pull/173
2024-02-25 13:32:13 +00:00
Adam Majer
cbf923e87b
Abstract hash function usage (#28138)
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.

This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
2023-12-13 21:02:00 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
df1e7d0067
Use db.Find instead of writing methods for every object (#28084)
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
2023-11-24 03:49:41 +00:00
KN4CK3R
58f5fa6536
Fix Matrix and MSTeams nil dereference (#28089)
Fixes #28088 
Fixes #28094

Added missing tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-11-17 12:17:33 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
16d15ce087
Fix package webhook (#27839)
Fix #23742

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-10-31 04:43:38 +00:00
Jason Song
4e98224a45
Support allowed hosts for webhook to work with proxy (#27655)
When `webhook.PROXY_URL` has been set, the old code will check if the
proxy host is in `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` or reject requests through the
proxy. It requires users to add the proxy host to `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST`.
However, it actually allows all requests to any port on the host, when
the proxy host is probably an internal address.

But things may be even worse. `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` doesn't really work
when requests are sent to the allowed proxy, and the proxy could forward
them to any hosts.

This PR fixes it by:

- If the proxy has been set, always allow connectioins to the host and
port.
- Check `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` before forwarding.
2023-10-18 09:44:36 +00:00
JakobDev
76a85a4ce9
Final round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27587)
Last part of #27065
2023-10-14 08:37:24 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
673cf6af76
make writing main test easier (#27270)
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-28 01:38:53 +00:00
John Olheiser
7520cd678c
Fix release URL in webhooks (#27182) 2023-09-21 17:55:09 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
4f32abaf94
move repository deletion to service layer (#26948)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-08 04:51:15 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
540bf9fa6d
Move notification interface to services layer (#26915)
Extract from #22266
2023-09-05 18:37:47 +00:00
谈笑风生间
5104c887d3
Modify the content format of the Feishu webhook (#25106)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24368

## what my pull request does

Since the official documentation states that custom bots do not support
hyperlink functionality, simply adding it without making some formatting
changes would result in an unappealing output. Therefore, I have
modified the formatting of the output. Currently, it is only used for
Feishu.

--- 


[docs](https://open.feishu.cn/document/uAjLw4CM/ukTMukTMukTM/im-v1/message/create_json#%E8%B6%85%E9%93%BE%E6%8E%A5%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%AF%B4%E6%98%8E)

<img width="641" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/360e1c81-ab64-4ef6-851e-aa450d6e85a4">

- Issue

<img width="423" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/519f6fae-81ab-4ec8-89b8-f6a73ff93783">


- Issue Comment


<img width="548" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/749c0d1c-3657-431e-b787-8bf4c23cce83">


- Assign

<img width="431" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/066f99e5-eabb-455d-91fb-a8359cc26dc7">

<img width="457" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/c6c10f99-db83-46ef-a775-4c91979fa68f">

- Merge

<img width="408" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/e627bf43-5954-45aa-acf6-261ee046802f">

- PullRequest

<img width="425" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/72cfa714-d3fa-4fb9-abdd-e8508d756056">
2023-08-24 09:00:11 +08:00
Yarden Shoham
16dee4f1b2
Add branch_filter to hooks API endpoints (#26599)
We now include the branch filler in the response.

- Closes #26591 

# Before

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/20454870/73933940-c1a7-4573-abae-f340b63028b2)

# After

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/20454870/3b3c4a85-0f7c-48c7-8617-def7a66c671d)

---------

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-21 11:43:52 +00:00
Earl Warren
50fc22eecf
Add ThreadID parameter for Telegram webhooks (#25996)
Telegram has recently implemented threads (channels) for group chats.

Co-authored-by: neveraskedtoexist <matikot415@gmail.com>
2023-08-13 14:00:06 +00:00
Yarden Shoham
220f236ff5
Add pull request review request webhook event (#26401)
Add webhook events for pull request review requests

- Fixes #26371
- Added support for the "Pull request review requested" and "Pull
request review request removed" webhook events.
- Updated the `getPullRequestPayloadInfo` function in `general.go` to
handle these new webhook events.

# Before

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/20454870/bd942971-fb1d-40f3-8961-46638e3588fa)

# After

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/20454870/216e9c7d-0a4d-49f9-8492-2d14c88bbf4e)

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-09 10:30:34 +02:00
puni9869
4971a10543
Warn instead of reporting an error when a webhook cannot be found (#26039)
Attemp fix: #25744
Fixing the log level when we delete any repo then we get error hook not
found by id. That should be warn level to reduce the noise in the logs.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-07-28 17:46:48 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
0fd1672ae4
For API attachments, use API URL (#25639)
Fix #25257

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-10 09:31:19 +00:00
Jason Song
174213530d
Fix Permission in API returned repository struct (#25388)
The old code generates `structs.Repository.Permissions` with only
`access.Permission.AccessMode`, however, it should check the units too,
or the value could be incorrect. For example,
`structs.Repository.Permissions.Push` could be false even the doer has
write access to code unit.

Should fix
https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/14059#issuecomment-1047961128
(Not reported by it, I just found it when I was looking into this bug)

---

Review tips:

The major changes are
- `modules/structs/repo.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-870406f6857117f8b03611c43fca0ab9ed6d6e76a2d0069a7c1f17e8fa9092f7
- `services/convert/repository.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-7736f6d2ae894c9edb7729a80ab89aa183b888a26a811a0c1fdebd18726a7101

And other changes are passive.
2023-06-22 13:08:08 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
419804fd4d
Fix compatible for webhook ref type (#25195)
Fix #25185 
Caused by #24634
2023-06-13 06:05:28 +00:00
谈笑风生间
a5acec329e
Rename NotifyPullReviewRequest to NotifyPullRequestReviewRequest (#24988)
after #24481

To keep consistent, maybe pull_request_review_request is better.

## what my pull request does

Rename NotifyPullReviewRequest to NotifyPullRequestReviewRequest.

<img width="1087" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/75628309/2cf91f02-74f2-42fe-a998-0a039b821d8d">
2023-05-31 15:54:46 +08:00
wxiaoguang
18f26cfbf7
Improve queue and logger context (#24924)
Before there was a "graceful function": RunWithShutdownFns, it's mainly
for some modules which doesn't support context.

The old queue system doesn't work well with context, so the old queues
need it.

After the queue refactoring, the new queue works with context well, so,
use Golang context as much as possible, the `RunWithShutdownFns` could
be removed (replaced by RunWithCancel for context cancel mechanism), the
related code could be simplified.

This PR also fixes some legacy queue-init problems, eg:

* typo : archiver: "unable to create codes indexer queue" => "unable to
create repo-archive queue"
* no nil check for failed queues, which causes unfriendly panic

After this PR, many goroutines could have better display name:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/701b2a9b-8065-4137-aeaa-0bda2b34604a)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/f1d5f50f-0534-40f0-b0be-f2c9daa5fe92)
2023-05-26 07:31:55 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
f9cfd6ce5b
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634)
This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.

Fix #15367
Replaces #23070 
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.

We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.

Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.

> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
> 
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
> 
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
> 
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
> 
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-26 01:04:48 +00:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
wxiaoguang
6f9c278559
Rewrite queue (#24505)
# ⚠️ Breaking

Many deprecated queue config options are removed (actually, they should
have been removed in 1.18/1.19).

If you see the fatal message when starting Gitea: "Please update your
app.ini to remove deprecated config options", please follow the error
messages to remove these options from your app.ini.

Example:

```
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].ISSUE_INDEXER_QUEUE_TYPE`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]`
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].UPDATE_BUFFER_LEN`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]`
2023/05/06 19:39:22 [F] Please update your app.ini to remove deprecated config options
```

Many options in `[queue]` are are dropped, including:
`WRAP_IF_NECESSARY`, `MAX_ATTEMPTS`, `TIMEOUT`, `WORKERS`,
`BLOCK_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_WORKERS`, they can be removed
from app.ini.

# The problem

The old queue package has some legacy problems:

* complexity: I doubt few people could tell how it works.
* maintainability: Too many channels and mutex/cond are mixed together,
too many different structs/interfaces depends each other.
* stability: due to the complexity & maintainability, sometimes there
are strange bugs and difficult to debug, and some code doesn't have test
(indeed some code is difficult to test because a lot of things are mixed
together).
* general applicability: although it is called "queue", its behavior is
not a well-known queue.
* scalability: it doesn't seem easy to make it work with a cluster
without breaking its behaviors.

It came from some very old code to "avoid breaking", however, its
technical debt is too heavy now. It's a good time to introduce a better
"queue" package.

# The new queue package

It keeps using old config and concept as much as possible.

* It only contains two major kinds of concepts:
    * The "base queue": channel, levelqueue, redis
* They have the same abstraction, the same interface, and they are
tested by the same testing code.
* The "WokerPoolQueue", it uses the "base queue" to provide "worker
pool" function, calls the "handler" to process the data in the base
queue.
* The new code doesn't do "PushBack"
* Think about a queue with many workers, the "PushBack" can't guarantee
the order for re-queued unhandled items, so in new code it just does
"normal push"
* The new code doesn't do "pause/resume"
* The "pause/resume" was designed to handle some handler's failure: eg:
document indexer (elasticsearch) is down
* If a queue is paused for long time, either the producers blocks or the
new items are dropped.
* The new code doesn't do such "pause/resume" trick, it's not a common
queue's behavior and it doesn't help much.
* If there are unhandled items, the "push" function just blocks for a
few seconds and then re-queue them and retry.
* The new code doesn't do "worker booster"
* Gitea's queue's handlers are light functions, the cost is only the
go-routine, so it doesn't make sense to "boost" them.
* The new code only use "max worker number" to limit the concurrent
workers.
* The new "Push" never blocks forever
* Instead of creating more and more blocking goroutines, return an error
is more friendly to the server and to the end user.

There are more details in code comments: eg: the "Flush" problem, the
strange "code.index" hanging problem, the "immediate" queue problem.

Almost ready for review.

TODO:

* [x] add some necessary comments during review
* [x] add some more tests if necessary
* [x] update documents and config options
* [x] test max worker / active worker
* [x] re-run the CI tasks to see whether any test is flaky
* [x] improve the `handleOldLengthConfiguration` to provide more
friendly messages
* [x] fine tune default config values (eg: length?)

## Code coverage:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/236620635-55576955-f95d-4810-b12f-879026a3afdf.png)
2023-05-08 19:49:59 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
377a0a20f0
Merge setting.InitXXX into one function with options (#24389)
This PR will merge 3 Init functions on setting packages as 1 and
introduce an options struct.
2023-05-04 11:55:35 +08:00
yp05327
dbb3736785
Fix incorrect webhook time and use relative-time to display it (#24477)
Fixes #24414
After click replay this webhook, it will display `now`

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/235559399-05a23927-13f5-442d-8f10-2c7cd24022a0.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-03 19:53:43 -04:00
Zettat123
9e04627aca
Fix incorrect HookEventType of pull request review comments (#23650)
`HookEventType` of pull request review comments should be
`HookEventPullRequestReviewComment` but some event types are
`HookEventPullRequestComment` now.
2023-03-24 13:13:04 +08:00
KN4CK3R
2173f14708
Add user webhooks (#21563)
Currently we can add webhooks for organizations but not for users. This
PR adds the latter. You can access it from the current users settings.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/197391408-15dfdc23-b476-4d0c-82f7-9bc9b065988f.png)
2023-03-10 08:28:32 -06:00
zeripath
1319ba6742
Use minio/sha256-simd for accelerated SHA256 (#23052)
minio/sha256-simd provides additional acceleration for SHA256 using
AVX512, SHA Extensions for x86 and ARM64 for ARM.

It provides a drop-in replacement for crypto/sha256 and if the
extensions are not available it falls back to standard crypto/sha256.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-02-22 14:21:46 -05:00
zeripath
35d2fa744a
Fix intermittent panic in notify issue change content (#23019)
Ensure that issue pullrequests are loaded before trying to set the
self-reference.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-02-20 19:15:49 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
c53ad052d8
Refactor the setting to make unit test easier (#22405)
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.

- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.

Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-20 00:12:01 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
bd820aa9c5
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.

But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.

The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
	ctx  context.Context
	data map[any]map[any]any
        lock sync.RWMutex
}

var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}

func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
	return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
		ctx:  ctx,
		data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
	})
}
```

Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.

```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```

Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.

```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
	return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
		return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
			res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
			return res.SettingValue, nil
		})
	})
}
```

First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.

An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
c8139c0f64
Webhooks: for issue close/reopen action, add commit ID that caused it (#22583)
The `commit_id` property name is the same as equivalent functionality in
GitHub. If the action was not caused by a commit, an empty string is
used.

This can for example be used to automatically add a Resolved label to an
issue fixed by a commit, or clear it when the issue is reopened.
2023-01-24 23:47:53 -05:00
John Olheiser
e7f1d45eb5
fix: omit avatar_url in discord payload when empty (#22393)
Fixes #22391

This field is optional for Discord, however when it exists in the
payload it is now validated.
Omitting it entirely just makes Discord use the default for that
webhook, which is set on the Discord side.

Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-10 14:01:52 -05:00
delvh
0f4e1b9ac6
Restructure webhook module (#22256)
Previously, there was an `import services/webhooks` inside
`modules/notification/webhook`.
This import was removed (after fighting against many import cycles).
Additionally, `modules/notification/webhook` was moved to
`modules/webhook`,
and a few structs/constants were extracted from `models/webhooks` to
`modules/webhook`.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-01 23:23:15 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
zeripath
787f6c3227
Ensure that Webhook tasks are not double delivered (#21558)
When re-retrieving hook tasks from the DB double check if they have not
been delivered in the meantime. Further ensure that tasks are marked as
delivered when they are being delivered.

In addition:
* Improve the error reporting and make sure that the webhook task
population script runs in a separate goroutine.
* Only get hook task IDs out of the DB instead of the whole task when
repopulating the queue
* When repopulating the queue make the DB request paged

Ref #17940 

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-23 22:10:04 +08:00
Jim Kirisame
c8f3eb6acb
Fix wechatwork webhook sends empty content in PR review (#21762)
Wechatwork webhook is sending the following string for pull request reviews:

``` markdown
# 
>
```

This commit fixes this problem.
2022-11-19 15:19:14 +00:00
KN4CK3R
044c754ea5
Add context.Context to more methods (#21546)
This PR adds a context parameter to a bunch of methods. Some helper
`xxxCtx()` methods got replaced with the normal name now.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-19 16:12:33 +08:00
Jim Kirisame
0ace4cee33
Fix webhook attachment text is not set in review comment (#21763)
The `getPullRequestPayloadInfo` function is widely used in many webhook,
it works well when PR is open or edit. But when we comment in PR review
panel (not PR panel), the comment content is not set as
`attachmentText`.

This commit set comment content as `attachmentText` when PR review, so
webhook could obtain this information via this function.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2022-11-13 11:57:52 -05:00
oliverpool
b6e81357bd
Add Webhook authorization header (#20926)
_This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_

## Context

In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:

- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872)
- TeamCity #18667
- Gitea instances #20267
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)

## Proposed solution

Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307).

This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872.

As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):


![2022-08-23-142911](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/186162483-5b721504-eef5-4932-812e-eb96a68494cc.png)

The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.

## Questions

- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind 
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~

## Done as well:

- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there


_Closes #19872_

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-03 20:23:20 +02:00
delvh
0ebb45cfe7
Replace all instances of fmt.Errorf(%v) with fmt.Errorf(%w) (#21551)
Found using
`find . -type f -name '*.go' -print -exec vim {} -c
':%s/fmt\.Errorf(\(.*\)%v\(.*\)err/fmt.Errorf(\1%w\2err/g' -c ':wq' \;`

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-10-24 20:29:17 +01:00
KN4CK3R
1887c95254
Decouple HookTask from Repository (#17940)
At the moment a repository reference is needed for webhooks. With the
upcoming package PR we need to send webhooks without a repository
reference. For example a package is uploaded to an organization. In
theory this enables the usage of webhooks for future user actions.

This PR removes the repository id from `HookTask` and changes how the
hooks are processed (see `services/webhook/deliver.go`). In a follow up
PR I want to remove the usage of the `UniqueQueue´ and replace it with a
normal queue because there is no reason to be unique.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2022-10-21 18:21:56 +02:00
KN4CK3R
cad9adeff4
Display total commit count in hook message (#21400)
Fixes #21379

The commits are capped by `setting.UI.FeedMaxCommitNum` so
`len(commits)` is not the correct number. So this PR adds a new
`TotalCommits` field.

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-10-17 00:22:34 +08:00
Akshay Mankar
f0aed8205b
Fix formatted link for PR review notifications to matrix (#21319)
The PR review notifications HTML was written as markdown due to not
using `MatrixLinkFormatter`.
2022-10-07 22:06:34 +01:00
Aaron F
3963625b6e
Webhook for Wiki changes (#20219)
Add support for triggering webhook notifications on wiki changes.

This PR contains frontend and backend for webhook notifications on wiki actions (create a new page, rename a page, edit a page and delete a page). The frontend got a new checkbox under the Custom Event -> Repository Events section. There is only one checkbox for create/edit/rename/delete actions, because it makes no sense to separate it and others like releases or packages follow the same schema.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018803-26851196-831f-4fde-9a4c-9e639b0e0d6b.png)

The actions itself are separated, so that different notifications will be executed (with the "action" field). All the webhook receivers implement the new interface method (Wiki) and the corresponding tests.

When implementing this, I encounter a little bug on editing a wiki page. Creating and editing a wiki page is technically the same action and will be handled by the ```updateWikiPage``` function. But the function need to know if it is a new wiki page or just a change. This distinction is done by the ```action``` parameter, but this will not be sent by the frontend (on form submit). This PR will fix this by adding the ```action``` parameter with the values ```_new``` or ```_edit```, which will be used by the ```updateWikiPage``` function.

I've done integration tests with matrix and gitea (http).

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018795-eb5cdc01-9ba3-483e-a6b7-ed0e313a71fb.png)

Fix #16457

Signed-off-by: Aaron Fischer <mail@aaron-fischer.net>
2022-09-04 20:54:23 +01:00