[#2769] Fix regression when writing different message types
Motivation: Due a regression NioSocketChannel.doWrite(...) will throw a ClassCastException if you do something like: channel.write(bytebuf); channel.write(fileregion); channel.flush(); Modifications: Correctly handle writing of different message types by using the correct message count while loop over them. Result: No more ClassCastException
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2416481e3
commit
050e7ed933
@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ package io.netty.testsuite.transport.socket;
|
||||
import io.netty.bootstrap.Bootstrap;
|
||||
import io.netty.bootstrap.ServerBootstrap;
|
||||
import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;
|
||||
import io.netty.buffer.Unpooled;
|
||||
import io.netty.channel.Channel;
|
||||
import io.netty.channel.ChannelHandler;
|
||||
import io.netty.channel.ChannelHandlerContext;
|
||||
@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ public class SocketFileRegionTest extends AbstractSocketTest {
|
||||
|
||||
private static void testFileRegion0(
|
||||
ServerBootstrap sb, Bootstrap cb, boolean voidPromise, final boolean autoRead) throws Throwable {
|
||||
final int bufferSize = 1024;
|
||||
final File file = File.createTempFile("netty-", ".tmp");
|
||||
file.deleteOnExit();
|
||||
|
||||
@ -96,7 +98,7 @@ public class SocketFileRegionTest extends AbstractSocketTest {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// .. and here comes the real data to transfer.
|
||||
out.write(data);
|
||||
out.write(data, bufferSize, data.length - bufferSize);
|
||||
|
||||
// .. and then some extra data which is not supposed to be transferred.
|
||||
for (int i = random.nextInt(8192); i > 0; i --) {
|
||||
@ -130,10 +132,16 @@ public class SocketFileRegionTest extends AbstractSocketTest {
|
||||
Channel sc = sb.bind().sync().channel();
|
||||
|
||||
Channel cc = cb.connect().sync().channel();
|
||||
FileRegion region = new DefaultFileRegion(new FileInputStream(file).getChannel(), startOffset, data.length);
|
||||
FileRegion region = new DefaultFileRegion(
|
||||
new FileInputStream(file).getChannel(), startOffset, data.length - bufferSize);
|
||||
// Do write ByteBuf and FileRegion to be sure that mixed writes work
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/2769
|
||||
if (voidPromise) {
|
||||
assertEquals(cc.voidPromise(), cc.write(Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(data, 0, bufferSize), cc.voidPromise()));
|
||||
assertEquals(cc.voidPromise(), cc.writeAndFlush(region, cc.voidPromise()));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assertNotEquals(cc.voidPromise(), cc.write(Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(data, 0, bufferSize)));
|
||||
assertNotEquals(cc.voidPromise(), cc.writeAndFlush(region));
|
||||
}
|
||||
while (sh.counter < data.length) {
|
||||
|
@ -297,18 +297,17 @@ public class NioSocketChannel extends AbstractNioByteChannel implements io.netty
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (done) {
|
||||
// Release all buffers
|
||||
for (int i = size; i > 0; i --) {
|
||||
// Release all written buffers.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// It's important to loop only over nioBufferCnt as there may be other messages in the
|
||||
// ChannelOutboundBuffer that are not of type ByteBuf and so was not included for gathering-write.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/2769
|
||||
for (int i = nioBufferCnt; i > 0; i --) {
|
||||
final ByteBuf buf = (ByteBuf) in.current();
|
||||
in.progress(buf.readableBytes());
|
||||
in.remove();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Finish the write loop if no new messages were flushed by in.remove().
|
||||
if (in.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
clearOpWrite();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Did not write all buffers completely.
|
||||
// Release the fully written buffers and update the indexes of the partially written buffer.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user