From 138e521b2274e474c4fd1307957354b690a3f6fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:16:02 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] typo

---
 src/docbook/module/architecture.xml | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/docbook/module/architecture.xml b/src/docbook/module/architecture.xml
index db776af4a2..b12aaf8d59 100644
--- a/src/docbook/module/architecture.xml
+++ b/src/docbook/module/architecture.xml
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@
 +--------+----------+</programlisting>
       <para>
         If <classname>ByteBuffer</classname> were used, you would have to
-        create a new big buffer and copy the three parts into the new
+        create a new big buffer and copy the two parts into the new
         buffer.   Alternatively, you can perform a gathering write operation
         in NIO, but it restricts you to represent the composite of buffers
-        as an array of <classname>ByteBuffer</classname> rather than a
+        as an array of <classname>ByteBuffer</classname>s rather than a
         single <classname>ByteBuffer</classname>, breaking the abstraction and
         introducing complicated state management.  Moreover, it's of no use if
         you are not going to read or write from an NIO channel.