Consistent naming style for enum

Motivation:

We should use camel-case for Enums.

Modifications:

Rename enums to use camel-case.

Result:

Consistent naming
This commit is contained in:
Norman Maurer 2015-08-19 17:27:58 +02:00
parent 2eb6809070
commit 4feafc4a52
4 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ public interface IpFilterRule {
boolean matches(InetSocketAddress remoteAddress);
/**
* @return This method should return {@link IpFilterRuleType#ACCEPT} if all
* @return This method should return {@link IpFilterRuleType#Accept} if all
* {@link IpFilterRule#matches(InetSocketAddress)} for which {@link #matches(InetSocketAddress)}
* returns true should the accepted. If you want to exclude all of those IP addresses then
* {@link IpFilterRuleType#REJECT} should be returned.
* {@link IpFilterRuleType#Reject} should be returned.
*/
IpFilterRuleType ruleType();
}

View File

@ -19,6 +19,6 @@ package io.netty.handler.ipfilter;
* Used in {@link IpFilterRule} to decide if a matching IP Address should be allowed or denied to connect.
*/
public enum IpFilterRuleType {
ACCEPT,
REJECT
Accept,
Reject
}

View File

@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ public class RuleBasedIpFilter extends AbstractRemoteAddressFilter<InetSocketAdd
}
if (rule.matches(remoteAddress)) {
return rule.ruleType() == IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT;
return rule.ruleType() == IpFilterRuleType.Accept;
}
}

View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ public class IpSubnetFilterTest {
@Test
public void testIpv4DefaultRoute() {
IpSubnetFilterRule rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("0.0.0.0", 0, IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT);
IpSubnetFilterRule rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("0.0.0.0", 0, IpFilterRuleType.Accept);
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("91.114.240.43")));
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("10.0.0.3")));
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("192.168.93.2")));
@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ public class IpSubnetFilterTest {
@Test
public void testIp4SubnetFilterRule() throws Exception {
IpSubnetFilterRule rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("192.168.56.1", 24, IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT);
IpSubnetFilterRule rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("192.168.56.1", 24, IpFilterRuleType.Accept);
for (int i = 0; i <= 255; i++) {
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress(String.format("192.168.56.%d", i))));
}
Assert.assertFalse(rule.matches(newSockAddress("192.168.57.1")));
rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("91.114.240.1", 23, IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT);
rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("91.114.240.1", 23, IpFilterRuleType.Accept);
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("91.114.240.43")));
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("91.114.240.255")));
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("91.114.241.193")));
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ public class IpSubnetFilterTest {
public void testIp6SubnetFilterRule() {
IpSubnetFilterRule rule;
rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("2001:db8:abcd:0000::", 52, IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT);
rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("2001:db8:abcd:0000::", 52, IpFilterRuleType.Accept);
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("2001:db8:abcd:0000::1")));
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("2001:db8:abcd:0fff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff")));
Assert.assertFalse(rule.matches(newSockAddress("2001:db8:abcd:1000::")));
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ public class IpSubnetFilterTest {
@Override
public IpFilterRuleType ruleType() {
return IpFilterRuleType.REJECT;
return IpFilterRuleType.Reject;
}
};