Consistent naming style for enum
Motivation: We should use camel-case for Enums. Modifications: Rename enums to use camel-case. Result: Consistent naming
This commit is contained in:
parent
2eb6809070
commit
4feafc4a52
@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ public interface IpFilterRule {
|
||||
boolean matches(InetSocketAddress remoteAddress);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return This method should return {@link IpFilterRuleType#ACCEPT} if all
|
||||
* @return This method should return {@link IpFilterRuleType#Accept} if all
|
||||
* {@link IpFilterRule#matches(InetSocketAddress)} for which {@link #matches(InetSocketAddress)}
|
||||
* returns true should the accepted. If you want to exclude all of those IP addresses then
|
||||
* {@link IpFilterRuleType#REJECT} should be returned.
|
||||
* {@link IpFilterRuleType#Reject} should be returned.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
IpFilterRuleType ruleType();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -19,6 +19,6 @@ package io.netty.handler.ipfilter;
|
||||
* Used in {@link IpFilterRule} to decide if a matching IP Address should be allowed or denied to connect.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public enum IpFilterRuleType {
|
||||
ACCEPT,
|
||||
REJECT
|
||||
Accept,
|
||||
Reject
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ public class RuleBasedIpFilter extends AbstractRemoteAddressFilter<InetSocketAdd
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rule.matches(remoteAddress)) {
|
||||
return rule.ruleType() == IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT;
|
||||
return rule.ruleType() == IpFilterRuleType.Accept;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ public class IpSubnetFilterTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testIpv4DefaultRoute() {
|
||||
IpSubnetFilterRule rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("0.0.0.0", 0, IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT);
|
||||
IpSubnetFilterRule rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("0.0.0.0", 0, IpFilterRuleType.Accept);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("91.114.240.43")));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("10.0.0.3")));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("192.168.93.2")));
|
||||
@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ public class IpSubnetFilterTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testIp4SubnetFilterRule() throws Exception {
|
||||
IpSubnetFilterRule rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("192.168.56.1", 24, IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT);
|
||||
IpSubnetFilterRule rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("192.168.56.1", 24, IpFilterRuleType.Accept);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i <= 255; i++) {
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress(String.format("192.168.56.%d", i))));
|
||||
}
|
||||
Assert.assertFalse(rule.matches(newSockAddress("192.168.57.1")));
|
||||
|
||||
rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("91.114.240.1", 23, IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT);
|
||||
rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("91.114.240.1", 23, IpFilterRuleType.Accept);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("91.114.240.43")));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("91.114.240.255")));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("91.114.241.193")));
|
||||
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ public class IpSubnetFilterTest {
|
||||
public void testIp6SubnetFilterRule() {
|
||||
IpSubnetFilterRule rule;
|
||||
|
||||
rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("2001:db8:abcd:0000::", 52, IpFilterRuleType.ACCEPT);
|
||||
rule = new IpSubnetFilterRule("2001:db8:abcd:0000::", 52, IpFilterRuleType.Accept);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("2001:db8:abcd:0000::1")));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(rule.matches(newSockAddress("2001:db8:abcd:0fff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff")));
|
||||
Assert.assertFalse(rule.matches(newSockAddress("2001:db8:abcd:1000::")));
|
||||
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ public class IpSubnetFilterTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public IpFilterRuleType ruleType() {
|
||||
return IpFilterRuleType.REJECT;
|
||||
return IpFilterRuleType.Reject;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user