andreacavalli/netty5
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fixed issue: NETTY-176 toByteBuffer() and slice() sometimes do not respect byte order

Browse Source 
* Added tests to make sure all ChannelBuffer implementations are fixed
* Fixed the byte order problem in HeapChannelBuffer
This commit is contained in:
Trustin Lee 2009-06-17 08:08:11 +00:00
parent b9cd9de5ed
commit 70e90fc85e
2 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/main/java/org/jboss/netty/buffer/HeapChannelBuffer.java
View File

@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ public abstract class HeapChannelBuffer extends AbstractChannelBuffer {
}
public ByteBuffer toByteBuffer(int index, int length) {
return ByteBuffer.wrap(array, index, length);
return ByteBuffer.wrap(array, index, length).order(order());
}
public String toString(int index, int length, String charsetName) {

10
src/test/java/org/jboss/netty/buffer/AbstractChannelBufferTest.java
View File

@ -1443,6 +1443,11 @@ public abstract class AbstractChannelBufferTest {
assertTrue(buffer.getByte(1) == duplicate.getByte(1));
}
@Test
public void testSlice() throws Exception {
assertEquals(buffer.order(), buffer.slice(1, buffer.capacity() - 1).order());
}
@Test
public void testEquals() {
assertFalse(buffer.equals(null));
@ -1561,6 +1566,11 @@ public abstract class AbstractChannelBufferTest {
}
}
@Test
public void testToByteBuffer3() {
assertEquals(buffer.order(), buffer.toByteBuffer().order());
}
@Test
public void testToByteBuffers1() {
byte[] value = new byte[buffer.capacity()];