Rewrite misleading Note in FingerprintTrustManagerFactory javadoc

Motivation:

The current note reads as if this class is dangerous and advises the reader to "understand what this class does".

Modifications:

Rewrite the Javadoc note to describe what fingerprint checks are and what problems remain.

Result:

Clearer description which no longer causes the impression this class is dangerous.

handler/src/main/java/io/netty/handler/ssl/util/FingerprintTrustManagerFactory.java

@@ -39,11 +39,19 @@ import java.util.regex.Pattern;
 /**
  * An {@link TrustManagerFactory} that trusts an X.509 certificate whose SHA1 checksum matches.
  * <p>
- * <strong>NOTE:</strong>
- * Never use this {@link TrustManagerFactory} in production unless you are sure exactly what you are doing with it.
- * </p><p>
+ * <strong>NOTE:</strong> It is recommended to verify certificates and their chain to prevent
+ * <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-in-the-middle_attack">Man-in-the-middle attacks</a>.
+ * This {@link TrustManagerFactory} will <strong>only</strong> verify that the fingerprint of certificates match one
+ * of the given fingerprints. This procedure is called
+ * <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security#Certificate_pinning">certificate pinning</a> and
+ * is an effective protection. For maximum security one should verify that the whole certificate chain is as expected.
+ * It is worth mentioning that certain firewalls, proxies or other appliances found in corporate environments,
+ * actually perform Man-in-the-middle attacks and thus present a different certificate fingerprint.
+ * </p>
+ * <p>
  * The SHA1 checksum of an X.509 certificate is calculated from its DER encoded format.  You can get the fingerprint of
  * an X.509 certificate using the {@code openssl} command.  For example:
+ *
  * <pre>
  * $ openssl x509 -fingerprint -sha1 -in my_certificate.crt
  * SHA1 Fingerprint=4E:85:10:55:BC:7B:12:08:D1:EA:0A:12:C9:72:EE:F3:AA:B2:C7:CB