Take memory overhead of ChannelOutboundBuffer / PendingWriteQueue into account

Motivation:

To guard against the case that a user will enqueue a lot of empty or small buffers and so raise an OOME we need to also take the overhead of the ChannelOutboundBuffer / PendingWriteQueue into account when detect if a Channel is writable or not. This is related to #5856.

Modifications:

When calculate the memory for an message that is enqueued also add some extra bytes depending on the implementation.

Result:

Better guard against OOME.

transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/ChannelOutboundBuffer.java

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ import io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocal;
 import io.netty.util.internal.InternalThreadLocalMap;
 import io.netty.util.internal.PlatformDependent;
 import io.netty.util.internal.PromiseNotificationUtil;
+import io.netty.util.internal.SystemPropertyUtil;
 import io.netty.util.internal.logging.InternalLogger;
 import io.netty.util.internal.logging.InternalLoggerFactory;
 
@@ -48,6 +49,15 @@ import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongFieldUpdater;
  * </p>
  */
 public final class ChannelOutboundBuffer {
+    // Assuming a 64-bit JVM:
+    //  - 16 bytes object header
+    //  - 8 reference fields
+    //  - 2 long fields
+    //  - 2 int fields
+    //  - 1 boolean field
+    //  - padding
+    static final int CHANNEL_OUTBOUND_BUFFER_ENTRY_OVERHEAD =
+            SystemPropertyUtil.getInt("io.netty.transport.outboundBufferEntrySizeOverhead", 96);
 
     private static final InternalLogger logger = InternalLoggerFactory.getInstance(ChannelOutboundBuffer.class);
 
@@ -128,7 +138,7 @@ public final class ChannelOutboundBuffer {
 
         // increment pending bytes after adding message to the unflushed arrays.
         // See https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/1619
-        incrementPendingOutboundBytes(size, false);
+        incrementPendingOutboundBytes(entry.pendingSize, false);
     }
 
     /**
@@ -783,7 +793,7 @@ public final class ChannelOutboundBuffer {
         static Entry newInstance(Object msg, int size, long total, ChannelPromise promise) {
             Entry entry = RECYCLER.get();
             entry.msg = msg;
-            entry.pendingSize = size;
+            entry.pendingSize = size + CHANNEL_OUTBOUND_BUFFER_ENTRY_OVERHEAD;
             entry.total = total;
             entry.promise = promise;
             return entry;

transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/PendingWriteQueue.java

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ package io.netty.channel;
 import io.netty.util.Recycler;
 import io.netty.util.ReferenceCountUtil;
 import io.netty.util.concurrent.PromiseCombiner;
+import io.netty.util.internal.SystemPropertyUtil;
 import io.netty.util.internal.logging.InternalLogger;
 import io.netty.util.internal.logging.InternalLoggerFactory;
 
@@ -28,6 +29,12 @@ import io.netty.util.internal.logging.InternalLoggerFactory;
  */
 public final class PendingWriteQueue {
     private static final InternalLogger logger = InternalLoggerFactory.getInstance(PendingWriteQueue.class);
+    // Assuming a 64-bit JVM:
+    //  - 16 bytes object header
+    //  - 4 reference fields
+    //  - 1 long fields
+    private static final int PENDING_WRITE_OVERHEAD =
+            SystemPropertyUtil.getInt("io.netty.transport.pendingWriteSizeOverhead", 64);
 
     private final ChannelHandlerContext ctx;
     private final ChannelOutboundBuffer buffer;
@@ -73,6 +80,17 @@ public final class PendingWriteQueue {
         return bytes;
     }
 
+    private int size(Object msg) {
+        // It is possible for writes to be triggered from removeAndFailAll(). To preserve ordering,
+        // we should add them to the queue and let removeAndFailAll() fail them later.
+        int messageSize = estimatorHandle.size(msg);
+        if (messageSize < 0) {
+            // Size may be unknow so just use 0
+            messageSize = 0;
+        }
+        return messageSize + PENDING_WRITE_OVERHEAD;
+    }
+
     /**
      * Add the given {@code msg} and {@link ChannelPromise}.
      */
@@ -86,11 +104,8 @@ public final class PendingWriteQueue {
         }
         // It is possible for writes to be triggered from removeAndFailAll(). To preserve ordering,
         // we should add them to the queue and let removeAndFailAll() fail them later.
-        int messageSize = estimatorHandle.size(msg);
-        if (messageSize < 0) {
-            // Size may be unknow so just use 0
-            messageSize = 0;
-        }
+        int messageSize = size(msg);
+
         PendingWrite write = PendingWrite.newInstance(msg, messageSize, promise);
         PendingWrite currentTail = tail;
         if (currentTail == null) {

transport/src/test/java/io/netty/channel/ChannelOutboundBufferTest.java

@@ -218,8 +218,8 @@ public class ChannelOutboundBufferTest {
             }
         });
 
-        ch.config().setWriteBufferLowWaterMark(128);
-        ch.config().setWriteBufferHighWaterMark(256);
+        ch.config().setWriteBufferLowWaterMark(128 + ChannelOutboundBuffer.CHANNEL_OUTBOUND_BUFFER_ENTRY_OVERHEAD);
+        ch.config().setWriteBufferHighWaterMark(256 + ChannelOutboundBuffer.CHANNEL_OUTBOUND_BUFFER_ENTRY_OVERHEAD);
 
         ch.write(buffer().writeZero(128));
         // Ensure exceeding the low watermark does not make channel unwritable.
@@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ public class ChannelOutboundBufferTest {
         // Ensure going down to the low watermark makes channel writable again by flushing the first write.
         assertThat(ch.unsafe().outboundBuffer().remove(), is(true));
         assertThat(ch.unsafe().outboundBuffer().remove(), is(true));
-        assertThat(ch.unsafe().outboundBuffer().totalPendingWriteBytes(), is(127L));
+        assertThat(ch.unsafe().outboundBuffer().totalPendingWriteBytes(),
+                is(127L + ChannelOutboundBuffer.CHANNEL_OUTBOUND_BUFFER_ENTRY_OVERHEAD));
         assertThat(buf.toString(), is("false true "));
 
         safeClose(ch);