Fixed issue: NETTY-31 (ChannelBuffers.equals() fails to compare the buffers with different endianness)
* Made sure to swap the order if the two buffers have different orders
This commit is contained in:
parent
48929afd60
commit
f4165b10e9
@ -650,6 +650,8 @@ public class ChannelBuffers {
|
||||
|
||||
int aIndex = bufferA.readerIndex();
|
||||
int bIndex = bufferB.readerIndex();
|
||||
|
||||
if (bufferA.order() == bufferB.order()) {
|
||||
for (int i = longCount; i > 0; i --) {
|
||||
if (bufferA.getLong(aIndex) != bufferB.getLong(bIndex)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@ -657,6 +659,15 @@ public class ChannelBuffers {
|
||||
aIndex += 8;
|
||||
bIndex += 8;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
for (int i = longCount; i > 0; i --) {
|
||||
if (bufferA.getLong(aIndex) != swapLong(bufferB.getLong(bIndex))) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
aIndex += 8;
|
||||
bIndex += 8;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = byteCount; i > 0; i --) {
|
||||
if (bufferA.getByte(aIndex) != bufferB.getByte(bIndex)) {
|
||||
|
@ -1069,6 +1069,60 @@ public abstract class AbstractChannelBufferTest {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testSequentialCopiedBufferTransfer() {
|
||||
buffer.writerIndex(0);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < buffer.capacity() - BLOCK_SIZE + 1; i += BLOCK_SIZE) {
|
||||
byte[] value = new byte[BLOCK_SIZE];
|
||||
random.nextBytes(value);
|
||||
assertEquals(0, buffer.readerIndex());
|
||||
assertEquals(i, buffer.writerIndex());
|
||||
buffer.writeBytes(value);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
random.setSeed(seed);
|
||||
byte[] expectedValue = new byte[BLOCK_SIZE];
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < buffer.capacity() - BLOCK_SIZE + 1; i += BLOCK_SIZE) {
|
||||
random.nextBytes(expectedValue);
|
||||
assertEquals(i, buffer.readerIndex());
|
||||
assertEquals(CAPACITY, buffer.writerIndex());
|
||||
ChannelBuffer actualValue = buffer.readBytes(BLOCK_SIZE);
|
||||
assertEquals(wrappedBuffer(expectedValue), actualValue);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure if it's a copied buffer.
|
||||
actualValue.setByte(0, (byte) (actualValue.getByte(0) + 1));
|
||||
assertFalse(buffer.getByte(i) == actualValue.getByte(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testSequentialSlice() {
|
||||
buffer.writerIndex(0);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < buffer.capacity() - BLOCK_SIZE + 1; i += BLOCK_SIZE) {
|
||||
byte[] value = new byte[BLOCK_SIZE];
|
||||
random.nextBytes(value);
|
||||
assertEquals(0, buffer.readerIndex());
|
||||
assertEquals(i, buffer.writerIndex());
|
||||
buffer.writeBytes(value);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
random.setSeed(seed);
|
||||
byte[] expectedValue = new byte[BLOCK_SIZE];
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < buffer.capacity() - BLOCK_SIZE + 1; i += BLOCK_SIZE) {
|
||||
random.nextBytes(expectedValue);
|
||||
assertEquals(i, buffer.readerIndex());
|
||||
assertEquals(CAPACITY, buffer.writerIndex());
|
||||
ChannelBuffer actualValue = buffer.readSlice(BLOCK_SIZE);
|
||||
System.out.println(wrappedBuffer(expectedValue) + ", " + hexDump(wrappedBuffer(expectedValue)));
|
||||
System.out.println(actualValue + ", " + hexDump(actualValue));
|
||||
assertEquals(wrappedBuffer(expectedValue), actualValue);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure if it's a sliced buffer.
|
||||
actualValue.setByte(0, (byte) (actualValue.getByte(0) + 1));
|
||||
assertEquals(buffer.getByte(i), actualValue.getByte(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testWriteZero() {
|
||||
buffer.clear();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user