Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Trustin Lee
d0912f2709 Fix most inspector warnings
Motivation:

It's good to minimize potentially broken windows.

Modifications:

Fix most inspector warnings from our profile
Update IntObjectHashMap

Result:

Cleaner code
2014-07-02 19:55:07 +09:00
Trustin Lee
7e1db4feb7 Deprecate CombinedChannelDuplexHandler in favor of ChannelHandlerAppender
- Fixes #2233
2014-02-13 19:20:25 -08:00
Norman Maurer
b57d9f307f Allow per-write promises and disallow promises on flush()
- write() now accepts a ChannelPromise and returns ChannelFuture as most
  users expected.  It makes the user's life much easier because it is
  now much easier to get notified when a specific message has been
  written.
- flush() does not create a ChannelPromise nor returns ChannelFuture.
  It is now similar to what read() looks like.
2013-07-11 00:49:48 +09:00
Trustin Lee
26e9d70457 Remove channelReadSuspended / Rename messageReceived(Last) to channelRead(Complete)
- Remove channelReadSuspended because it's actually same with messageReceivedLast
- Rename messageReceived to channelRead
- Rename messageReceivedLast to channelReadComplete

We renamed messageReceivedLast to channelReadComplete because it
reflects what it really is for.  Also, we renamed messageReceived to
channelRead for consistency in method names.
2013-07-09 23:58:51 +09:00
Trustin Lee
cbd8817905 Remove MessageList from public API and change ChannelInbound/OutboundHandler accordingly
I must admit MesageList was pain in the ass.  Instead of forcing a
handler always loop over the list of messages, this commit splits
messageReceived(ctx, list) into two event handlers:

- messageReceived(ctx, msg)
- mmessageReceivedLast(ctx)

When Netty reads one or more messages, messageReceived(ctx, msg) event
is triggered for each message.  Once the current read operation is
finished, messageReceivedLast() is triggered to tell the handler that
the last messageReceived() was the last message in the current batch.

Similarly, for outbound, write(ctx, list) has been split into two:

- write(ctx, msg)
- flush(ctx, promise)

Instead of writing a list of message with a promise, a user is now
supposed to call write(msg) multiple times and then call flush() to
actually flush the buffered messages.

Please note that write() doesn't have a promise with it.  You must call
flush() to get notified on completion. (or you can use writeAndFlush())

Other changes:

- Because MessageList is completely hidden, codec framework uses
  List<Object> instead of MessageList as an output parameter.
2013-07-09 23:51:48 +09:00
Norman Maurer
617ab6321b [#1489] Correctly handle channelReadSuspended and channelWritabilityChanged in CombinedChannelDuplexHandler 2013-06-30 17:18:33 +02:00
Trustin Lee
14158070bf Revamp the core API to reduce memory footprint and consumption
The API changes made so far turned out to increase the memory footprint
and consumption while our intention was actually decreasing them.

Memory consumption issue:

When there are many connections which does not exchange data frequently,
the old Netty 4 API spent a lot more memory than 3 because it always
allocates per-handler buffer for each connection unless otherwise
explicitly stated by a user.  In a usual real world load, a client
doesn't always send requests without pausing, so the idea of having a
buffer whose life cycle if bound to the life cycle of a connection
didn't work as expected.

Memory footprint issue:

The old Netty 4 API decreased overall memory footprint by a great deal
in many cases.  It was mainly because the old Netty 4 API did not
allocate a new buffer and event object for each read.  Instead, it
created a new buffer for each handler in a pipeline.  This works pretty
well as long as the number of handlers in a pipeline is only a few.
However, for a highly modular application with many handlers which
handles connections which lasts for relatively short period, it actually
makes the memory footprint issue much worse.

Changes:

All in all, this is about retaining all the good changes we made in 4 so
far such as better thread model and going back to the way how we dealt
with message events in 3.

To fix the memory consumption/footprint issue mentioned above, we made a
hard decision to break the backward compatibility again with the
following changes:

- Remove MessageBuf
- Merge Buf into ByteBuf
- Merge ChannelInboundByte/MessageHandler and ChannelStateHandler into ChannelInboundHandler
  - Similar changes were made to the adapter classes
- Merge ChannelOutboundByte/MessageHandler and ChannelOperationHandler into ChannelOutboundHandler
  - Similar changes were made to the adapter classes
- Introduce MessageList which is similar to `MessageEvent` in Netty 3
- Replace inboundBufferUpdated(ctx) with messageReceived(ctx, MessageList)
- Replace flush(ctx, promise) with write(ctx, MessageList, promise)
- Remove ByteToByteEncoder/Decoder/Codec
  - Replaced by MessageToByteEncoder<ByteBuf>, ByteToMessageDecoder<ByteBuf>, and ByteMessageCodec<ByteBuf>
- Merge EmbeddedByteChannel and EmbeddedMessageChannel into EmbeddedChannel
- Add SimpleChannelInboundHandler which is sometimes more useful than
  ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter
- Bring back Channel.isWritable() from Netty 3
- Add ChannelInboundHandler.channelWritabilityChanges() event
- Add RecvByteBufAllocator configuration property
  - Similar to ReceiveBufferSizePredictor in Netty 3
  - Some existing configuration properties such as
    DatagramChannelConfig.receivePacketSize is gone now.
- Remove suspend/resumeIntermediaryDeallocation() in ByteBuf

This change would have been impossible without @normanmaurer's help. He
fixed, ported, and improved many parts of the changes.
2013-06-10 16:10:39 +09:00
Norman Maurer
ca5554dfe7 [#1236] Fix problem where adding a new ChannelHandler could block the eventloop
This change also introduce a few other changes which was needed:
 * ChannelHandler.beforeAdd(...) and ChannelHandler.beforeRemove(...) were removed
 * ChannelHandler.afterAdd(...) -> handlerAdded(...)
 * ChannelHandler.afterRemoved(...) -> handlerRemoved(...)
 * SslHandler.handshake() -> SslHandler.hanshakeFuture() as the handshake is triggered automatically after
   the Channel becomes active
2013-04-19 07:00:50 +02:00
Trustin Lee
d4742bbe16 Clean up abstract ChannelHandler impls / Remove ChannelHandlerContext.hasNext*()
- Rename ChannelHandlerAdapter to ChannelDuplexHandler
- Add ChannelHandlerAdapter that implements only ChannelHandler
- Rename CombinedChannelHandler to CombinedChannelDuplexHandler and
  improve runtime validation
- Remove ChannelInbound/OutboundHandlerAdapter which are not useful
- Make ChannelOutboundByteHandlerAdapter similar to
  ChannelInboundByteHandlerAdapter
- Make the tail and head handler of DefaultChannelPipeline accept both
  bytes and messages.  ChannelHandlerContext.hasNext*() were removed
  because they always return true now.
- Removed various unnecessary null checks.
- Correct method/field names:
  inboundBufferSuspended -> channelReadSuspended
2013-02-07 23:47:45 +09:00