Motivation:
There should always be a default in switch blocks.
Modification:
Add default
Result:
Code cleanup.
Signed-off-by: xingrufei <xingrufei@sogou-inc.com>
Motivation:
There should always be a default in switch blocks.
Modification:
Add default
Result:
Code cleanup.
Signed-off-by: xingrufei <xingrufei@sogou-inc.com>
Motivation:
We have currently two test-failures in master. Let's disable these and then open a PR with a fix once we know why. This way we can make progress in master
Modifications:
Disable the two failing tests
Result:
Master builds again
Motivation:
We should have a default case in every switch block.
Modification:
Add default block in IdleStateHandler
Result:
Cleanup
Signed-off-by: xingrufei <xingrufei@sogou-inc.com>
Motivation:
When searching for the delimiter, the decoder part within HttpPostBodyUtil
was not checking the left space to check if it could be included or not,
while it should.
Modifications:
Add a check on toRead being greater or equal than delimiterLength before
going within the loop. If the check is wrong, the delimiter is obviously not found.
Add a Junit test to preserve regression.
Result:
No more IndexOutOfBoundsException
Fixes#11334
Motivation:
b89a807d15 moved the buffer tests to junit5 but introduced a small error which could lead to test-failure
Modifications:
Correctly override the method and assert that super throws (as we can not expand the buffer).
Result:
No more test failures
Motivation:
Every switch block should also have a default case.
Modification:
Add default block in DnsOpCode to ensure we not fall-through by mistake
Result:
Cleanup
Signed-off-by: xingrufei <xingrufei@sogou-inc.com>
Motivation:
Every switch block should also have a default case.
Modification:
Add default block in AbstractDnsMessage to ensure we not fall-through by mistake
Result:
Cleanup
Signed-off-by: xingrufei <xingrufei@sogou-inc.com>
Motivation:
Every switch block should also have a default case.
Modification:
Add default block in DefaultHttpHeaders to ensure we not fall-through by mistake
Result:
Cleanup
Signed-off-by: xingrufei <xingrufei@sogou-inc.com>
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
throw exception if there is no method, it never is null, condition is always true
Modification:
remove unnecessary condition
Result:
cleanup
Motivation:
We only release a static compiled version of netty-tcnative for windows so we need to ensure we use it when on windows and not try to use a dynamic build version.
Modifications:
Automatically renable the boringssl profile when on windows
Result:
Fixes https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/11302
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
Let's also build on windows during PR validation
Modifications:
Add build on windows during PR
Result:
Validate that all also pass on windows
Motivation:
Incoming `Http2GoAwayFrame#lastStreamId()` tells what was the last
streamId that the remote peer takes for processing [1]. We fire a
userEvent for all streams above that value to let users know those are
safe to retry on another connection. There is no need to go through
`forEachActiveStream` if `lastStreamId == Integer.MAX_VALUE` because
none of the streams can have id greater that MAX_VALUE.
1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7540#section-6.8
Modifications:
- Return fast from `onHttp2GoAwayFrame` in `Http2MultiplexCodec` and
`Http2MultiplexHandler` if `lastStreamId() == Integer.MAX_VALUE`;
Result:
No unnecessary iteration over active streams on GO_AWAY if
`lastStreamId() == Integer.MAX_VALUE`.
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in handler-proxy tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in handler-proxy tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in codec-stomp tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in codec-memcache tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in codec-dns tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in codec-smtp tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in codec-smtp tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
JUnit 5 is more expressive, extensible, and composable in many ways, and it's better able to run tests in parallel.
Modifications:
Use JUnit5 in codec-smtp tests
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/10757
Motivation:
When object-references are both same, the method should return 0 directly with no necessary go loop&compare the content of the ByteBuf.
Modification:
Added short circuit when both object-references are the same for equals and compare methods.
Result:
Added short circuit code.
Motivation:
1. The docs about the 'retun value' of the method `io.netty.util.internal.MathUtil#isOutOfBounds` is not correct.
2. The capacity parameter should be checked for overflowed case.
Modification:
1. Changed the doc to:
> @return {@code false} if the requested {@code index} and {@code length} will fit within {@code capacity}.
> {@code true} if this would result in an index out of bounds exception.
2. Improved the bounder checking logic.
Result:
Fixes#11279Fixes#11280
Motivation:
We shouldn't include benchmarks and tests in the generated javadocs to keep things clean
Modifications:
Add some more excludes
Result:
Javadocs for benchmarks and tests are not published
Motivation:
612ab58448 did change the way how netty-all was produced by unfortunally it messed up the dependency graph for our native artifacts. This commit reverts changes done by 612ab58448 and also clean up the profiles
Modifications:
netty-all is useable again
Result:
Fixes https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/11272
Motivation:
We should better fail the build if we can't load the OpenSSL library to ensure we not introduce a regression at some point related to native library loading
Modifications:
Remove usages of assumeTrue and let the tests fail if we cant load the native lib
Result:
Ensure we not regress
Motivation:
We need to ensure we correctly cleanup all the jars that are build for the integration tests that verify shading otherwise we may deploy these during release.
Modifications:
Correctly remove all the generated jars
Result:
Not deploy the jars by mistake
Motivation:
We shouldn't include netty-examples as dependency for netty-all as this will try to pull in all sorts of dependencies which are optional.
Modifications:
Remove dependency on netty-examples
Result:
Related to https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/11272
