Motivation:
Socks5InitialRequestDecoder does not correctly handle fragmentation
Modifications:
- Delete detection of not enough bytes as ReplyingDecoder already handles all of this correctly.
- Add unit test
Result:
Fixes#9574.
Motivation:
There appears to be a thread-safety issue in the way that `SocksAuthRequest` is using its `CharsetEncoder` instance. `CharsetUtil#encoder` returns a cached thread-local encoder instance, so it is not correct to store this instance in a static member variable and reuse it across multiple threads. The result is an occasional `IllegalStateException` as in the following example:
```
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Current state = RESET, new state = FLUSHED
at java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.throwIllegalStateException(CharsetEncoder.java:989)
at java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.flush(CharsetEncoder.java:672)
at java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.encode(CharsetEncoder.java:801)
at java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.canEncode(CharsetEncoder.java:907)
at java.base/java.nio.charset.CharsetEncoder.canEncode(CharsetEncoder.java:982)
at io.netty.handler.codec.socks.SocksAuthRequest.<init>(SocksAuthRequest.java:43)
```
Modification:
Instead of retrieving the thread-local encoder instance once and storing it as a static member instance, the encoder should be retrieved each time the constructor is invoked. This change prevents any potential concurrency issues where multiple threads may end up using the same encoder instance.
Result:
Fixes#9556.
Motivation:
Most of the maven modules do not explicitly declare their
dependencies and rely on transitivity, which is not always correct.
Modifications:
For all maven modules, add all of their dependencies to pom.xml
Result:
All of the (essentially non-transitive) depepdencies of the modules are explicitly declared in pom.xml
* Optimize AbstractByteBuf.getCharSequence() in US_ASCII case
Motivation:
Inspired by https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/8388, I noticed this
simple optimization to avoid char[] allocation (also suggested in a TODO
here).
Modifications:
Return an AsciiString from AbstractByteBuf.getCharSequence() if
requested charset is US_ASCII or ISO_8859_1 (latter thanks to
@Scottmitch's suggestion). Also tweak unit tests not to require Strings
and include a new benchmark to demonstrate the speedup.
Result:
Speed-up of AbstractByteBuf.getCharSequence() in ascii and iso 8859/1
cases