Commit Graph

27 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Norman Maurer
b57d9f307f Allow per-write promises and disallow promises on flush()
- write() now accepts a ChannelPromise and returns ChannelFuture as most
  users expected.  It makes the user's life much easier because it is
  now much easier to get notified when a specific message has been
  written.
- flush() does not create a ChannelPromise nor returns ChannelFuture.
  It is now similar to what read() looks like.
2013-07-11 00:49:48 +09:00
Trustin Lee
cbd8817905 Remove MessageList from public API and change ChannelInbound/OutboundHandler accordingly
I must admit MesageList was pain in the ass.  Instead of forcing a
handler always loop over the list of messages, this commit splits
messageReceived(ctx, list) into two event handlers:

- messageReceived(ctx, msg)
- mmessageReceivedLast(ctx)

When Netty reads one or more messages, messageReceived(ctx, msg) event
is triggered for each message.  Once the current read operation is
finished, messageReceivedLast() is triggered to tell the handler that
the last messageReceived() was the last message in the current batch.

Similarly, for outbound, write(ctx, list) has been split into two:

- write(ctx, msg)
- flush(ctx, promise)

Instead of writing a list of message with a promise, a user is now
supposed to call write(msg) multiple times and then call flush() to
actually flush the buffered messages.

Please note that write() doesn't have a promise with it.  You must call
flush() to get notified on completion. (or you can use writeAndFlush())

Other changes:

- Because MessageList is completely hidden, codec framework uses
  List<Object> instead of MessageList as an output parameter.
2013-07-09 23:51:48 +09:00
Norman Maurer
9100256a56 Javadocs cleanup 2013-06-13 20:49:05 +02:00
Trustin Lee
14158070bf Revamp the core API to reduce memory footprint and consumption
The API changes made so far turned out to increase the memory footprint
and consumption while our intention was actually decreasing them.

Memory consumption issue:

When there are many connections which does not exchange data frequently,
the old Netty 4 API spent a lot more memory than 3 because it always
allocates per-handler buffer for each connection unless otherwise
explicitly stated by a user.  In a usual real world load, a client
doesn't always send requests without pausing, so the idea of having a
buffer whose life cycle if bound to the life cycle of a connection
didn't work as expected.

Memory footprint issue:

The old Netty 4 API decreased overall memory footprint by a great deal
in many cases.  It was mainly because the old Netty 4 API did not
allocate a new buffer and event object for each read.  Instead, it
created a new buffer for each handler in a pipeline.  This works pretty
well as long as the number of handlers in a pipeline is only a few.
However, for a highly modular application with many handlers which
handles connections which lasts for relatively short period, it actually
makes the memory footprint issue much worse.

Changes:

All in all, this is about retaining all the good changes we made in 4 so
far such as better thread model and going back to the way how we dealt
with message events in 3.

To fix the memory consumption/footprint issue mentioned above, we made a
hard decision to break the backward compatibility again with the
following changes:

- Remove MessageBuf
- Merge Buf into ByteBuf
- Merge ChannelInboundByte/MessageHandler and ChannelStateHandler into ChannelInboundHandler
  - Similar changes were made to the adapter classes
- Merge ChannelOutboundByte/MessageHandler and ChannelOperationHandler into ChannelOutboundHandler
  - Similar changes were made to the adapter classes
- Introduce MessageList which is similar to `MessageEvent` in Netty 3
- Replace inboundBufferUpdated(ctx) with messageReceived(ctx, MessageList)
- Replace flush(ctx, promise) with write(ctx, MessageList, promise)
- Remove ByteToByteEncoder/Decoder/Codec
  - Replaced by MessageToByteEncoder<ByteBuf>, ByteToMessageDecoder<ByteBuf>, and ByteMessageCodec<ByteBuf>
- Merge EmbeddedByteChannel and EmbeddedMessageChannel into EmbeddedChannel
- Add SimpleChannelInboundHandler which is sometimes more useful than
  ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter
- Bring back Channel.isWritable() from Netty 3
- Add ChannelInboundHandler.channelWritabilityChanges() event
- Add RecvByteBufAllocator configuration property
  - Similar to ReceiveBufferSizePredictor in Netty 3
  - Some existing configuration properties such as
    DatagramChannelConfig.receivePacketSize is gone now.
- Remove suspend/resumeIntermediaryDeallocation() in ByteBuf

This change would have been impossible without @normanmaurer's help. He
fixed, ported, and improved many parts of the changes.
2013-06-10 16:10:39 +09:00
Trustin Lee
d4742bbe16 Clean up abstract ChannelHandler impls / Remove ChannelHandlerContext.hasNext*()
- Rename ChannelHandlerAdapter to ChannelDuplexHandler
- Add ChannelHandlerAdapter that implements only ChannelHandler
- Rename CombinedChannelHandler to CombinedChannelDuplexHandler and
  improve runtime validation
- Remove ChannelInbound/OutboundHandlerAdapter which are not useful
- Make ChannelOutboundByteHandlerAdapter similar to
  ChannelInboundByteHandlerAdapter
- Make the tail and head handler of DefaultChannelPipeline accept both
  bytes and messages.  ChannelHandlerContext.hasNext*() were removed
  because they always return true now.
- Removed various unnecessary null checks.
- Correct method/field names:
  inboundBufferSuspended -> channelReadSuspended
2013-02-07 23:47:45 +09:00
Norman Maurer
ec013bf2d3 [#983] Force the user to implement an actual ChannelInboundHandler or ChannelOutboundHandler
For this ChannelInboundHandler* and ChannelOutboundHandler* was made package private
2013-01-31 15:50:27 +01:00
Trustin Lee
dd6b7969b7 Give a handler more control over how its buffers' read bytes are discarded.
This pull request adds two new handler methods: discardInboundReadBytes(ctx) and discardOutboundReadBytes(ctx) to ChannelInboundByteHandler and ChannelOutboundByteHandler respectively. They are called between every inboundBufferUpdated() and flush() respectively. Their default implementation is to call discardSomeReadBytes() on their buffers and a user can override this behavior easily. For example, ReplayingDecoder.discardInboundReadBytes() looks like the following:

    @Override
    public void discardInboundReadBytes(ChannelHandlerContext ctx) throws Exception {
        ByteBuf in = ctx.inboundByteBuffer();
        final int oldReaderIndex = in.readerIndex();
        super.discardInboundReadBytes(ctx);
        final int newReaderIndex = in.readerIndex();
        checkpoint -= oldReaderIndex - newReaderIndex;
    }

If a handler, which has its own buffer index variable, extends ReplayingDecoder or ByteToMessageDecoder, the handler can also override discardInboundReadBytes() and adjust its index variable accordingly.
2013-01-09 13:34:09 +09:00
Norman Maurer
a9fdb682be Add javadocs and some small cleanups 2012-12-23 20:58:49 +01:00
Norman Maurer
e05b071b41 Javadocs update 2012-12-22 19:27:09 +01:00
Trustin Lee
def12a171c Rename ChannelBuf to Buf and ChannelBufType to BufType
- Fixes #825
2012-12-17 17:43:45 +09:00
Trustin Lee
03e68482bb Remove ChannelBuf/ByteBuf.Unsafe
- Fixes #826
Unsafe.isFreed(), free(), suspend/resumeIntermediaryAllocations() are not that dangerous. internalNioBuffer() and internalNioBuffers() are dangerous but it seems like nobody is using it even inside Netty. Removing those two methods also removes the necessity to keep Unsafe interface at all.
2012-12-17 17:41:21 +09:00
Trustin Lee
51e6519b67 Replace UnsafeByteBuf with ByteBuf.unsafe() again
* UnsafeByteBuf is gone. I added ByteBuf.unsafe() back.
* To avoid extra instantiation, all ByteBuf implementations implement the ByteBuf.Unsafe interface.
* To hide this implementation detail, all ByteBuf implementations are package-private.
* AbstractByteBuf and SwappedByteBuf are public and they do not implement ByteBuf.Unsafe because they don't need to.
* unwrap() is not an unsafe operation anymore.
* ChannelBuf also has unsafe() and Unsafe. ByteBuf.Unsafe extends ChannelBuf.unsafe(). ChannelBuf.unsafe() provides free() operation so that a user does not need to down-cast the buffer in freeInbound/OutboundBuffer().
2012-12-05 19:28:56 +09:00
Trustin Lee
42380b54b3 Revert file mode 2012-07-07 14:39:35 +09:00
Norman Maurer
f8ef5d5d78 Next round for async channel api support a.k.a nio2. See See #396 2012-06-14 21:02:47 +02:00
Trustin Lee
574d84e98e Remove ChannelBufferHolder / Add more handler interfaces for type safety
- ChannelInboundHandler and ChannelOutboundHandler does not have a type
  parameter anymore.  
- User should implement ChannelInboundMessageHandler or
  ChannelOutboundMessageHandler.
2012-06-10 12:22:32 +09:00
Trustin Lee
87f52aa604 Ensure that a user implements flush() or inboundBufferUpdated()
- Also prohibited a user from overriding
  ChannelInbound(Byte|Message)HandlerAdapter.  If a user wants to do
  that, he or she should extend ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter instead.
2012-06-10 10:48:11 +09:00
Trustin Lee
8701e24b9a Add back Channel(Inbound|Outbound)(Message|Stream)HandlerAdapter
- they are useful when creating an anonymous class
- Also added back CombinedChannelHandler with extra constraints
2012-06-07 17:49:45 +09:00
Trustin Lee
aab71ccd8a Remove Channel(Inbound|Outbound)HandlerAdapter which does nothing
- Thanks to the recent refactoring, Channel(Inbound|Outbound)Handler-
  Adapter ended up having empty body.  No need to keep.
2012-06-07 17:25:15 +09:00
Trustin Lee
ea0c9cfe79 Post-overhaul fixes / Split LoggingHandler into three
- LoggingHandler now only logs state and operations
- StreamLoggingHandler and MessageLoggingHandler log the buffer content
- Added ChannelOperationHandlerAdapter
  - Used by WriteTimeoutHandler
2012-06-07 16:56:21 +09:00
Trustin Lee
5e93d206ff Overhaul - Split ChannelHandler & Merge ChannelHandlerContext
- Extracted some handler methods from ChannelInboundHandler into
  ChannelStateHandler
- Extracted some handler methods from ChannelOutboundHandler into
  ChannelOperationHandler
- Moved exceptionCaught and userEventTriggered are now in
  ChannelHandler
  
- Channel(Inbound|Outbound)HandlerContext is merged into
  ChannelHandlerContext
- ChannelHandlerContext adds direct access methods for inboud and
  outbound buffers
  - The use of ChannelBufferHolder is minimal now.
    - Before: inbound().byteBuffer()
    - After: inboundByteBuffer()
    - Simpler and better performance
    
- Bypass buffer types were removed because it just does not work at all
  with the thread model.
  - All handlers that uses a bypass buffer are broken.  Will fix soon.

- CombinedHandlerAdapter does not make sense anymore either because
  there are four handler interfaces to consider and often the two
  handlers will implement the same handler interface such as
  ChannelStateHandler.  Thinking of better ways to provide this feature
2012-06-07 14:52:33 +09:00
Trustin Lee
1eced1e9e3 Update license headers 2012-06-04 13:31:44 -07:00
Trustin Lee
7ddc93bed8 Ported IdleStateHandler / Forward-ported the UptimeClient example
- Add ChannelHandlerContext.eventLoop() for convenience
- Bootstrap and ServerBootstrap handles channel initialization failure
  better
- More strict checks for missing @Sharable annotation
  - A handler without @Sharable annotation cannot be added more than
    once now.
2012-05-31 14:54:48 -07:00
Trustin Lee
026715e818 Refactor the pipeline API to support stacked codecs
- Previous API did not support the pipeline which contains multiple
  MessageToStreamEncoders because there was no way to find the closest
  outbound byte buffer.  Now you always get the correct buffer even if
  the handler that provides the buffer is placed distantly.
  For example:
  
    Channel -> MsgAEncoder -> MsgBEncoder -> MsgCEncoder
  
  Msg(A|B|C)Encoder will all have access to the channel's outbound
  byte buffer.  Previously, it was simply impossible.

- Improved ChannelBufferHolder.toString()
2012-05-29 12:09:29 -07:00
Trustin Lee
da9ecadfc0 Introduce bypass buffer and use it in LoggingHandler
- Added ChannelBufferHolders.(inbound|outbound)BypassBuffer()
  - The holder returned by these methods returns the next handler's
    buffer.  When a handler's new(Inbound|Outbound)Buffer returns
    a bypass holder, your inboundBufferUpdated() and flush()
    implementation should check if the buffer is a bypass and should not
    modify the content of the buffer.
- Channel(Inbound|Outbound)?HandlerAdapter is now abstract.
  - A user has to specify the exact inbound/outbound buffer type
  - It's because there's no way to determine the best buffer type
- Implemented LoggingHandler using the new API.
  - It doesn't dump received or sent messages yet.
- Fixed a bug where DefaultUnsafe.close() does not trigger deregister()
- Fixed a bug where NioSocketChannel.isActive() does not return false
  when closed
2012-05-10 23:19:59 +09:00
Trustin Lee
129a2af86a Initial working version of the echo server example
- Optimized AbstractChannelBuffer.discardReadBytes()
- Split ChannelHandlerInvoker into ChannelInboundInvoker and
  ChannelOutboundInvoker
  - Channel implements ChannelOutboundInvoker
  - ChannelOutboundInvoker.nextOut() is now out()
  - ChannelOutboundHandlerContext.out() is now prevOut()
  - Added the outbound operations without future
    parameter to ChannelOutboundInvoker for user convenience
- All async operations which requires a ChannelFuture as a parameter
  now returns ChannelFuture for user convenience
- Added ChannelFutureFactory.newVoidFuture() to allow a user specify
  a dummy future that is of no use
  - I'm unsure if it is actually a good idea to introduce it. It might
    go away later.
- Made the contract of AbstractChannel.doXXX() much simpler and moved
  all common code up to AbstractChannel.DefaultUnsafe
- Added Channel.isOpen()
- Fixed a bug where MultithreadEventLoop always shut down its child
  event loops on construction
- Maybe more changes I don't remember :-)
2012-05-09 22:09:06 +09:00
Trustin Lee
368156f5d0 Another round of the new API design
- Channel now creates a ChannelPipeline by itself

  I find no reason to allow a user to use one's own pipeline
  implementation since I saw nobody does except for the cases where a
  user wants to add a user attribute to a channel, which is now covered
  by AttributeMap.

- Removed ChannelEvent and its subtypes because they are replaced by
  direct method invocation.
- Replaced ChannelSink with Channel.unsafe()
- Various getter renaming (e.g. Channel.getId() -> Channel.id())
- Added ChannelHandlerInvoker interface
- Implemented AbstractChannel and AbstractServerChannel
- Some other changes I don't remember
2012-05-01 17:19:41 +09:00
Trustin Lee
cdd1ba93f0 Second round of new channel handler API design
- Rename ChannelReader to ChannelInboundHandler
- Rename ChannelWriter to ChannelOutboundHandler
- Introduce ChannelBufferHolder instead of adding the common super type
  of message buffers and byte buffers
  - This is more type-safe and natural.
- Remove the notification methods for buffer closure (might add back
  later when revisiting half-closed connection support)
2012-04-29 17:53:50 +09:00