andreacavalli/netty5
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
5,459 Commits 27 Branches 234 Tags 84 MiB
47d0a85720
Commit Graph

382 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Norman Maurer
b3d8c81557 Fix all leaks reported during tests 
- One notable leak is from WebSocketFrameAggregator
- All other leaks are from tests
 2013-12-07 00:44:56 +09:00
Trustin Lee
2102cb062b Fix false-positive leaks 
- All derived buffers and swapped buffers of a leak-aware buffer must be wrapped again with the leak-aware buffer
 2013-12-06 21:32:56 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e506581eb1 Add ReferenceCountUtil.releaseLater() to make writing tests easy with ReferenceCounteds 2013-12-06 15:13:00 +09:00
Trustin Lee
128c4b96b5 Checkstyle 2013-12-06 13:54:36 +09:00
Trustin Lee
5d39b1fc3d Also record retain() and release() 2013-12-06 13:45:24 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e88172495a Ensure backward compatibility 
.. by resurrecting the removed methods and system properties.
 2013-12-05 01:02:38 +09:00
Trustin Lee
65b522a2a7 Better buffer leak reporting 
- Remove the reference to ResourceLeak from the buffer implementations
  and use wrappers instead:
  - SimpleLeakAwareByteBuf and AdvancedLeakAwareByteBuf
  - It is now allocator's responsibility to create a leak-aware buffer.
  - Added AbstractByteBufAllocator.toLeakAwareBuffer() for easier
    implementation
- Add WrappedByteBuf to reduce duplication between *LeakAwareByteBuf and
  UnreleasableByteBuf
- Raise the level of leak reports to ERROR - because it will break the
  app eventually
- Replace enabled/disabled property with the leak detection level
  - Only print stack trace when level is ADVANCED or above to avoid user
    confusion
- Add the 'leak' build profile, which enables highly detailed leak
  reporting during the build
- Remove ResourceLeakException which is unsed anymore
 2013-12-05 00:51:39 +09:00
Norman Maurer
053c512f6d Fix checkstyle 2013-12-02 08:23:57 +01:00
Norman Maurer
14600167d6 [#2021] No need to synchronize for unpooled chunks 2013-12-02 08:02:48 +01:00
Norman Maurer
17f5865e38 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-11-29 19:31:01 +01:00
Norman Maurer
ead617fdcc [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.14.Beta1 2013-11-29 19:30:55 +01:00
Norman Maurer
6cf2748dbb [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-11-28 15:04:51 +01:00
Norman Maurer
5fe7596f49 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.13.Final 2013-11-28 15:04:46 +01:00
Trustin Lee
407f0a36f5 Simplify bundle generation / Add io.netty.versions.properties to all JARs 
- Fixes #2003 properly
- Instead of using 'bundle' packaging, use 'jar' packaging.  This is
  more robust because some strict build tools fail to retrieve the
  artifacts from a Maven repository unless their packaging is not 'jar'.
- All artifacts now contain META-INF/io.netty.version.properties, which
  provides the detailed information about the build and repository.
- Removed OSGi testsuite temporarily because it gives false errors
  during split package test and examination.
- Add io.netty.util.Version for easy retrieval of version information
 2013-11-26 22:01:46 +09:00
Norman Maurer
7231be592a Also allow to override how direct ByteBuffers are freed 2013-11-12 12:40:41 +01:00
Norman Maurer
e83fb821d5 Allow to override how wrapped direct ByteBuffer are allocated to make it easier to extend 2013-11-12 12:13:38 +01:00
Norman Maurer
b00f8c6390 [#1976] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException when calling CompositeByteBuf.discardReadComponents() 2013-11-09 20:13:24 +01:00
Alex Petrov
e4f391f626 Improve docstrings for and of 2013-11-08 12:15:41 +01:00
Trustin Lee
ba3bc0c020 Simpler toString() for ByteBufAllocators 2013-11-08 17:54:34 +09:00
Norman Maurer
db78581bbb [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-11-07 18:11:45 +01:00
Norman Maurer
2386777af8 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.12.Final 2013-11-07 18:11:38 +01:00
Norman Maurer
77b4ec7e1b [#1800] [#1802] Correctly expand capacity of ByteBuf while preserve content 2013-11-04 15:18:21 +01:00
Trustin Lee
54db9ec725 Use StringUtil.simpleClassName(..) instead of Class.getSimpleName() where necessary 
- Class.getSimpleName() doesn't render anonymous classes very well
- + some minor cleanup
 2013-11-04 19:46:15 +09:00
Norman Maurer
4ce49a6195 [#1943] Unpooled.copiedBuffer(ByteBuf pooled) should always return unpooled ByteBuf 2013-10-22 20:20:38 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ceab146b54 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-10-21 07:43:42 +02:00
Norman Maurer
27a89d6032 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.11.Final 2013-10-21 07:41:49 +02:00
Norman Maurer
68b616728a [#1925] Only expose sub-region of ByteBuf on nioBuffer(...) 2013-10-16 10:34:33 +02:00
Norman Maurer
d946659520 [#1906] Use a ByteBuf allocator from the ByteBufAllocator when encode Strings 2013-10-09 21:18:08 +02:00
Norman Maurer
1c73be21fc Remove redundant index check 2013-10-08 07:21:01 +02:00
Bill Gallagher
8f612660b2 disable debugging output during test 2013-10-04 06:45:26 +02:00
Norman Maurer
d7da19f745 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-10-02 15:48:52 +02:00
Norman Maurer
d35768ae11 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.10.Final 2013-10-02 15:48:45 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ee192f0321 [#1880] Use ByteBufAllocator when read bytes into new chunks 2013-10-01 10:10:43 +02:00
Norman Maurer
6d09e57be7 [#1875] Correctly check the readerIndex when try to read a byte from AbstractByteBuf 2013-09-30 14:47:49 +02:00
Norman Maurer
b4fa8af079 Cache underlying ByteBuffers and count in ChannelOutboundBuffer.Entry to reduce object creation and so GC pressure 
Beside this it also helps to reduce CPU usage as nioBufferCount() is quite expensive when used on CompositeByteBuf which are
nested and contains a lot of components
 2013-09-26 20:37:39 +02:00
Norman Maurer
2b9a07cac9 CompositeByteBuf.isDirect() should return true if its only backed by direct buffers 2013-09-26 20:37:31 +02:00
Norman Maurer
a74149e984 [#1865] Only use internalNioBuffer when one of the read* or write* methods are used. This is neccessary to prevent races as those can happen when a slice or duplicate is shared between different Channels 
that are not assigned to the same EventLoop. In general get* operations should always be safe to be used from different Threads.

This aslo include unit tests that show the issue
 2013-09-25 17:27:26 +02:00
Norman Maurer
910ed31a1b [#1851] EmptyByteBuf.isWritable(..) and isReadable(...) should not throw IndexOutOfBoundsException 2013-09-21 20:40:22 +02:00
Norman Maurer
23baef8fb4 [#1853] Optimize gathering writes for CompositeByteBuf that are only backed by one ByteBuffer 2013-09-19 07:29:58 +02:00
Norman Maurer
c0bbde48b7 [#1852] Fix bug in UnpooledDirectByteBuf.nioBuffer(...) implementation 2013-09-18 20:47:57 +02:00
Greg Soltis
f1d4f813ed Fix nioBuffer implementation for CompositeByteBuf 2013-09-16 06:41:08 +02:00
Norman Maurer
451e91d142 [#1821] Fix IndexOutOfBoundsException which was thrown if the last component was removed but other components was left 2013-09-09 20:29:30 +02:00
Norman Maurer
ffab456aca Bump up version to reflect correct one 2013-09-09 11:20:12 +02:00
Norman Maurer
363531caf9 [maven-release-plugin] rollback the release of netty-4.0.9.Final 2013-09-06 09:18:34 +02:00
Norman Maurer
9d53573ee8 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-09-06 09:17:15 +02:00
Norman Maurer
25c226a835 Make sure only direct ByteBuffer are passed to the underlying jdk Channel. 
This is needed because of otherwise the JDK itself will do an extra ByteBuffer copy with it's own pool implementation. Even worth it will be done
multiple times if the ByteBuffer is always only partial written. With this change the copy is done inside of netty using it's own allocator and
only be done one time in all cases.
 2013-09-02 20:17:53 +02:00
Norman Maurer
5416f2315e [#1797] No use internalNioBuffer() in derived buffers as it is not meant for concurrent access 2013-09-02 14:15:19 +02:00
Norman Maurer
0007fb81ef Add tests to try to track down some buffer issues 2013-09-02 13:50:47 +02:00
Norman Maurer
795182843d Remove legancy code which we not need anymore as we use gathering writes anyway everywhere 2013-09-01 11:00:58 +02:00
Norman Maurer
5ddd7cee90 [#1797] Throw IllegalArgumentException if AbstractByteBuf.skipBytes(...) is used with a negative value 2013-08-29 11:14:36 +02:00