andreacavalli/netty5
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
4,939 Commits 27 Branches 234 Tags 84 MiB
4b11aff08f
Commit Graph

934 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Trustin Lee
4b11aff08f Less confusing log messages for system properties 
- Fixes #1502
 2013-07-02 09:23:29 +09:00
Norman Maurer
5d88c423df [#1500] Remove @deprecated methods 2013-07-01 08:53:02 +02:00
Norman Maurer
617ab6321b [#1489] Correctly handle channelReadSuspended and channelWritabilityChanged in CombinedChannelDuplexHandler 2013-06-30 17:18:33 +02:00
Trustin Lee
ea963c25c9 Improve Javadoc of ChannelPipeline 
- Fixes #1226
 2013-06-28 22:09:00 +09:00
Trustin Lee
5f1aa6afde Remove potentially misleading exception message 
.. because the MessageList itself is not read-only.
 2013-06-28 21:25:15 +09:00
Trustin Lee
591dce565a checkExclusive() -> checkIndex() 2013-06-28 21:17:18 +09:00
Trustin Lee
d4665f1703 Fix test failures 2013-06-28 21:14:23 +09:00
Trustin Lee
1e0146da3e Optimize MessageList.add(MessageList, int, int) 2013-06-28 20:53:57 +09:00
Trustin Lee
7cf88a1a3c Add MessageList.array() / Rewrite MessageList.add(T[], int, int) 
- MessageList.array() should give better performance + concise code
- MessageList.add(T[], int, int) iterated over the source array 3 times at worst case. This commit reduces that to 1 time.
 2013-06-28 20:47:19 +09:00
Trustin Lee
0dcf352f4c Vastly simplified ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor 
- Related: #1378
- They now accept only one argument.
- A user who wants to use a buffer for more complex use cases, he or she can always access the buffer directly via memoryAddress() and array()
 2013-06-28 20:29:00 +09:00
Trustin Lee
52691488ee Update Javadoc of ByteBufProcessor and MessageListProcessor 
- in response to @shacharo's suggestion
 2013-06-27 19:01:01 +09:00
Trustin Lee
4dd9b6ef2e Add ByteBufProcessor and ByteBuf.forEach(...) 
- Fixes #1378
- Needs to provide optimized forEach implementations though.
 2013-06-27 13:55:42 +09:00
Trustin Lee
734ec51ac9 Allow specifying 0 as the default number of threads when instantiating an EventLoopGroup 
- Fixes #1426
- We already allow a user instantiate an EventLoopGroup with the default number of threads via the default constructor, so I think it's OK although it's not always optimal.
 2013-06-27 10:39:39 +09:00
Trustin Lee
bc483724f4 Improve the documentation of MessageList 
- Fixes #1459
 2013-06-25 18:27:29 +09:00
Trustin Lee
1f27c3b390 Make NioByteUnsafe.read() respect ChannelConfig.maxMessagesPerRead and adjust the default from 16 to 1 
- Fixes #1486
- Decreased the default from 16 to 1 because unnecessary extra read on req-res protocols results in lower throughput due to extra syscalls.
 2013-06-25 18:08:39 +09:00
Trustin Lee
a1632e7d15 Add ChannelConfig.maxMessagesPerRead and ChannelOption.MAX_MESSAGES_PER_READ 
- Fixes #1486
- Make sure AbstractNioMessageChannel.NioMessageUnsafe.read() only up to maxMessagesPerRead
 2013-06-25 17:49:28 +09:00
Trustin Lee
c77f03d886 Fix AdaptiveRecvByteBufAllocator.getSizeTableIndex() 2013-06-25 11:07:15 +09:00
Norman Maurer
c9d01b2fb5 [#1461] Correctly handle DefaultChannelGroup.write(..) of ByteBuf and ByteBufHolder 2013-06-25 11:07:14 +09:00
Trustin Lee
cfb3b977a1 Fix the catastrophic failure caused by AdaptiveRecvByteBufAllocator.getSizeTableIndex() 2013-06-25 11:07:14 +09:00
Trustin Lee
a2f232720b Make AdaptiveRecvByteBufAllocator's lookup table simpler / Optimize buffer size normalization 
- No need to have fine-grained lookup table because the buffer pool has
  much more coarse capacities available
- No need to use a loop to normalize a buffer capacity
 2013-06-25 11:07:14 +09:00
Trustin Lee
a969613540 Merge ChannelInboundConsumingHandler into SimpleChannelInboundHandler 
- SimpleChannelInboundHandler now has a constructor parameter to let a
  user decide to enable automatic message release. (the default is to
  enable), which makes ChannelInboundConsumingHandler of less value.
 2013-06-25 11:07:14 +09:00
Norman Maurer
bfc9c6d80d Add ChannelInboundConsumingHandler 
..which is useful when the handler is placed at the last position of the
pipeline because it releases the received messages automatically.
 2013-06-25 11:07:14 +09:00
Tony Rice
6c5c119f8c Fix incorrect parameter validation in DefaultFileRegion 2013-06-25 11:07:14 +09:00
Norman Maurer
cce74efded [#1448] Don't print failure if VoidChannelPromise is used 2013-06-16 14:25:02 +02:00
Norman Maurer
6a9f965f9b Introduce new utility class calles ReferenceCountUtil and move utility methods from ByteBufUtil to it. 
The ones in ByteBufUtil were marked as @deprecated
 2013-06-14 07:07:33 +02:00
Norman Maurer
4bf5003f76 Don't release messages before throw UnsupportedOperationException, as the caller method will take care 2013-06-14 06:41:27 +02:00
Trustin Lee
fe40d4b67f Make sure writing to a closed channel does not trigger an UnsupportedOperationException 
- Fixes #1442
 2013-06-14 11:15:46 +09:00
Trustin Lee
25c51279cf Revert "[#1442] Make sure closing the channel will not cause an UnsupportedOperationException" 
This reverts commit a1a86b9de4 because the
semantic of ctx.isRemoved() is confusing to a user - why is
ctx.isRemoved() false when handlerRemoved() is invoked? A better
solution would be check if the connection is inactive and mark the
promise as failure before attempting to write anything.
 2013-06-14 10:47:31 +09:00
Trustin Lee
a0c082497a Remove unused exception classes 2013-06-14 10:21:41 +09:00
Norman Maurer
8edee3272a More javadoc fixes 2013-06-13 20:56:17 +02:00
Norman Maurer
dc070a00b2 Deprecate IncompleteFlushException as its not used anymore 2013-06-13 20:50:21 +02:00
Norman Maurer
9100256a56 Javadocs cleanup 2013-06-13 20:49:05 +02:00
Norman Maurer
0e16b22aa1 Deprecate NoSuchBufferException as it's not used anymore 2013-06-13 20:48:54 +02:00
Norman Maurer
a1a86b9de4 [#1442] Make sure closing the channel will not cause an UnsupportedOperationException 2013-06-13 18:10:56 +02:00
Trustin Lee
427d9c4bf2 Fix test failures and reported leaks 2013-06-13 15:18:11 +09:00
Trustin Lee
f178b8d421 Suppress duplicate warning message printed when a message reaches at the end of pipeline 2013-06-13 13:23:52 +09:00
Trustin Lee
175526b6bd Move ReferenceCounted and AbstractReferenceCounted to io.netty.util 
- Fixes #1441
- Also move and rename IllegalBufferAccessException to ReferenceCountException
- Prettier reference count exception messages
 2013-06-13 13:14:21 +09:00
Trustin Lee
283feda119 Reduce even more garbage by exposing ByteBuf.internalNioBuffer() 2013-06-13 12:40:26 +09:00
Trustin Lee
5131c024fa Tiny optimization 2013-06-13 12:15:41 +09:00
Trustin Lee
96380e756c Fix test failures introduced by 78d8f05c21 2013-06-13 11:51:03 +09:00
Trustin Lee
2088d1b491 Generate less garbage when performing gathering writes 2013-06-13 10:27:10 +09:00
Norman Maurer
d1a3806ebd Make use of gathering writes if a MessageList which only contains ByteBuf msgs is written to a NioSocketChannel 2013-06-12 09:45:33 +02:00
Trustin Lee
79e236dfc2 Make EventExecutor.shutdownGracefully() return Future 
- Also added EventExecutor.terminationFuture()
- Also fixed type signature problem with Future.add/removeListener()
- Related issue: #1389
 2013-06-12 08:00:54 +09:00
Trustin Lee
fd0084ecfa Remove the constructors that uses ImmediateEventExecutor from DefaultChannelGroup 
.. which is incorrect in my opinion.

+ minor cleanup
 2013-06-12 06:50:38 +09:00
Trustin Lee
7a1550631d Make write operation cancellation while it's in progress 
.. which should be useful when writing a large buffer/file
 2013-06-12 04:24:07 +09:00
Norman Maurer
5b978497f8 Cleanup 2013-06-11 16:24:06 +02:00
Trustin Lee
c3034c8964 Implement the cancellation of connection attmpe for NIO and OIO transport 
- Related issue: #1432
- Also added test cases to validate the implementation
 2013-06-11 18:46:39 +09:00
Trustin Lee
7a5cf48b8d Implement Promise/Future cancellation properly for outbound traffic 
- Related issue: #1432
- Make sure the Promise of a write operation is not cancellable before writing out
 2013-06-11 17:54:35 +09:00
Trustin Lee
41af9a1eb3 Implement cancellation properly for Promise/Future 
- Related issue: #1432
- Add Future.isCancellable()
- Add Promise.setUncancellable() which is meant to be used for the party that runs the task uncancellable once started
- Implement Future.isCancelled() and Promise.cancel(boolean) properly
 2013-06-11 17:46:21 +09:00
Norman Maurer
85afdda3ce Correctly write MessageList which contains more then one message 2013-06-11 10:30:15 +02:00