Commit Graph

209 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Trustin Lee
49aa907bd0 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-02-26 16:55:07 -08:00
Trustin Lee
5026c2f359 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.0.Beta2 2013-02-26 16:54:53 -08:00
Trustin Lee
d68a04a879 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2013-02-14 12:56:24 -08:00
Trustin Lee
59e638f8f5 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.0.0.Beta1 2013-02-14 12:56:15 -08:00
Trustin Lee
eeae6f993c Microbench doesn't need to be an OSGi bundle 2013-02-14 12:15:58 -08:00
Trustin Lee
54ac1cd420 Fix build issues in microbench / Disable tests by default 2013-02-14 11:51:55 -08:00
Norman Maurer
fd75615d7a [#870] Convert all modules into osgi bundles 2013-02-06 07:57:11 +01:00
Trustin Lee
6339feaa8f Apply advanced JVM options to benchmarks / Fix duplicate uploads
- Add common optimization options when launching a new JVM to run a benchmark
- Fix a bug where a benchmark report is uploaded twice
- Simplify pom.xml and move the build instruction messages to DefaultBenchmark
- Print an empty line to prettify the output
2012-12-14 00:00:41 +09:00
Trustin Lee
b47fc77522 Add PooledByteBufAllocator + microbenchmark module
This pull request introduces the new default ByteBufAllocator implementation based on jemalloc, with a some differences:

* Minimum possible buffer capacity is 16 (jemalloc: 2)
* Uses binary heap with random branching (jemalloc: red-black tree)
* No thread-local cache yet (jemalloc has thread-local cache)
* Default page size is 8 KiB (jemalloc: 4 KiB)
* Default chunk size is 16 MiB (jemalloc: 2 MiB)
* Cannot allocate a buffer bigger than the chunk size (jemalloc: possible) because we don't have control over memory layout in Java. A user can work around this issue by creating a composite buffer, but it's not always a feasible option. Although 16 MiB is a pretty big default, a user's handler might need to deal with the bounded buffers when the user wants to deal with a large message.

Also, to ensure the new allocator performs good enough, I wrote a microbenchmark for it and made it a dedicated Maven module. It uses Google's Caliper framework to run and publish the test result (example)

Miscellaneous changes:

* Made some ByteBuf implementations public so that those who implements a new allocator can make use of them.
* Added ByteBufAllocator.compositeBuffer() and its variants.
* ByteBufAllocator.ioBuffer() creates a buffer with 0 capacity.
2012-12-13 22:35:06 +09:00