13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Trustin Lee
5c49cae981 Reverted back to the previous MessageEvent.toString() implementation that is more correct 2009-07-18 07:49:31 +00:00
Trustin Lee
2cf7816903 Reverted back to the previous MessageEvent implementation that should perform better in most cases 2009-07-18 07:46:49 +00:00
Trustin Lee
3610fa9608 * Updated the Javadoc of MessageEvent
* Improved how getRemoteAddress() works in DownstreamMessageEvent and UpstreamMessageEvent
2009-07-18 07:43:13 +00:00
Trustin Lee
7be842be05 * MessageEvent.getRemoteAddress() does not return null anymore
* Improved the String representation of MessageEvent implementations
2009-07-18 07:38:39 +00:00
Trustin Lee
29da430183 Javadoc 2009-06-17 09:33:20 +00:00
Trustin Lee
ec0b3fe3f2 * Moved internal utility classes to org.jboss.netty.util.internal
* Made org.jboss.netty.util public
* Moved ObjectSizeEstimator and its implementation to org.jboss.netty.util
2009-04-03 07:41:54 +00:00
Trustin Lee
149d97d013 * Fixed issue: NETTY-125 (Backward incompatible) Use an integer as a Channel ID instead of UUID
* More concise Channel.toString() and ChannelEvent.toString() implementations
2009-02-16 11:59:33 +00:00
Trustin Lee
334ea6f6e6 Now that there are two MessageEvent implementation, there's no point of having Channels.messageEvent() - a user could just create a new instance by calling the respective implementation's constructor 2009-02-11 09:56:28 +00:00
Trustin Lee
2030411759 Reverted r825 which doesn't make much sense 2009-02-11 09:47:53 +00:00
Trustin Lee
859f9a37a2 ChannelEvent implementations don't need to be public - package private is just enough because all events can be fired and created using Channels. 2009-02-11 06:03:00 +00:00
Trustin Lee
dd971b5f79 Prettier string representation of ChannelEvent implementations 2009-02-08 16:37:49 +00:00
Trustin Lee
52e4288964 Prettier string representation of ChannelEvent implementations 2009-02-08 16:12:18 +00:00
Trustin Lee
8f92cfb80a Optimized event implementation to reduce memory footprint and improve performance somewhat 2009-02-05 05:56:47 +00:00