Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Norman Maurer
b4d4c0034d Optimize HPACK usage to align more with Netty types and remove heavy object creations. Related to [#3597]
Motivations:

The HPACK code was not really optimized and written with Netty types in mind. Because of this a lot of garbage was created due heavy object creation.

This was first reported in [#3597] and https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/issues/1872 .

Modifications:

- Directly use ByteBuf as input and output
- Make use of ByteProcessor where possible
- Use AsciiString as this is the only thing we need for our http2 usage

Result:

Less garbage and better usage of Netty apis.
2016-06-22 14:26:05 +02:00
Moses Nakamura
f0f0b69d90 fixed "sensative" typo to read "sensitive" 2016-02-17 08:18:11 -08:00
Scott Mitchell
19658e9cd8 HTTP/2 Headers Type Updates
Motivation:
The HTTP/2 RFC (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7540#section-8.1.2) indicates that header names consist of ASCII characters. We currently use ByteString to represent HTTP/2 header names. The HTTP/2 RFC (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7540#section-10.3) also eludes to header values inheriting the same validity characteristics as HTTP/1.x. Using AsciiString for the value type of HTTP/2 headers would allow for re-use of predefined HTTP/1.x values, and make comparisons more intuitive. The Headers<T> interface could also be expanded to allow for easier use of header types which do not have the same Key and Value type.

Motivation:
- Change Headers<T> to Headers<K, V>
- Change Http2Headers<ByteString> to Http2Headers<CharSequence, CharSequence>
- Remove ByteString. Having AsciiString extend ByteString complicates equality comparisons when the hash code algorithm is no longer shared.

Result:
Http2Header types are more representative of the HTTP/2 RFC, and relationship between HTTP/2 header name/values more directly relates to HTTP/1.x header names/values.
2015-10-30 15:29:44 -07:00