Commit Graph

466 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Scott Mitchell
0d3a6e0511 HTTP/2 Decoder reduce preface conditional checks
Motivation:
The DefaultHttp2ConnectionDecoder class is calling verifyPrefaceReceived() for almost every frame event at all times.
The Http2ConnectionHandler class is calling readClientPrefaceString() on every decode event.

Modifications:
- DefaultHttp2ConnectionDecoder should not have to continuously call verifyPrefaceReceived() because it transitions boolean state 1 time for each connection.
- Http2ConnectionHandler should not have to continuously call readClientPrefaceString() because it transitions boolean state 1 time for each connection.

Result:
- Less conditional checks for the mainstream usage of the connection.
2015-03-28 18:52:35 -07:00
Leo Gomes
4500adb6e0 Updates the javadoc of Unpooled to remove mention to methods it does not provide
Motivation:

`Unpooled` javadoc's mentioned the generation of hex dump and swapping an integer's byte order,
which are actually provided by `ByteBufUtil`.

Modifications:

 Sentence moved to `ByteBufUtil` javadoc.

Result:

`Unpooled` javadoc is correct.
2015-03-04 12:04:14 +09:00
Norman Maurer
fce0989844 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2015-03-03 02:06:47 -05:00
Norman Maurer
ca3b1bc4b7 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.0.Beta4 2015-03-03 02:05:52 -05:00
Norman Maurer
41fd857a7c Ensure CompositeByteBuf.addComponent* handles buffer in consistent way and not causes leaks
Motivation:

At the moment we have two problems:
 - CompositeByteBuf.addComponent(...) will not add the supplied buffer to the CompositeByteBuf if its empty, which means it will not be released on CompositeByteBuf.release() call. This is a problem as a user will expect everything added will be released (the user not know we not added it).
 - CompositeByteBuf.addComponents(...) will either add no buffers if none is readable and so has the same problem as addComponent(...) or directly release the ByteBuf if at least one ByteBuf is readable. Again this gives inconsistent handling and may lead to memory leaks.

Modifications:

 - Always add the buffer to the CompositeByteBuf and so release it on release call.

Result:

Consistent handling and no buffer leaks.
2015-02-12 16:09:41 +01:00
Trustin Lee
155c0e2f36 Implement internal memory access methods of CompositeByteBuf correctly
Motivation:

When a CompositeByteBuf is empty (i.e. has no component), its internal
memory access operations do not always behave as expected.

Modifications:

Check if the nunmber of components is zero. If so, return an empty
array or an empty NIO buffer, etc.

Result:

More robustness
2014-12-30 15:56:53 +09:00
Trustin Lee
a666acce6d Add more tests to EmptyByteBufTest
- Ensure an EmptyByteBuf has an array, an NIO buffer, and a memory
  address at the same time
- Add an assertion that checks if EMPTY_BUFFER is an EmptyByteBuf,
  just in case we make a mistake in the future
2014-12-30 15:51:45 +09:00
Norman Maurer
fe796fc8ab Provide helper methods in ByteBufUtil to write UTF-8/ASCII CharSequences. Related to [#909]
Motivation:

We expose no methods in ByteBuf to directly write a CharSequence into it. This leads to have the user either convert the CharSequence first to a byte array or use CharsetEncoder. Both cases have some overheads and we can do a lot better for well known Charsets like UTF-8 and ASCII.

Modifications:

Add ByteBufUtil.writeAscii(...) and ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8(...) which can do the task in an optimized way. This is especially true if the passed in ByteBuf extends AbstractByteBuf which is true for all of our implementations which not wrap another ByteBuf.

Result:

Writing an ASCII and UTF-8 CharSequence into a AbstractByteBuf is a lot faster then what the user could do by himself as we can make use of some package private methods and so eliminate reference and range checks. When the Charseq is not ASCII or UTF-8 we can still do a very good job and are on par in most of the cases with what the user would do.

The following benchmark shows the improvements:

Result: 2456866.966 ?(99.9%) 59066.370 ops/s [Average]
  Statistics: (min, avg, max) = (2297025.189, 2456866.966, 2586003.225), stdev = 78851.914
  Confidence interval (99.9%): [2397800.596, 2515933.336]

Benchmark                                                        Mode   Samples        Score  Score error    Units
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeAscii                         thrpt        50  9398165.238   131503.098    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeAsciiString                   thrpt        50  9695177.968   176684.821    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeAsciiStringViaArray           thrpt        50  4788597.415    83181.549    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeAsciiStringViaArrayWrapped    thrpt        50  4722297.435    98984.491    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeAsciiStringWrapped            thrpt        50  4028689.762    66192.505    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeAsciiViaArray                 thrpt        50  3234841.565    91308.009    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeAsciiViaArrayWrapped          thrpt        50  3311387.474    39018.933    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeAsciiWrapped                  thrpt        50  3379764.250    66735.415    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeUtf8                          thrpt        50  5671116.821   101760.081    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeUtf8String                    thrpt        50  5682733.440   111874.084    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeUtf8StringViaArray            thrpt        50  3564548.995    55709.512    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeUtf8StringViaArrayWrapped     thrpt        50  3621053.671    47632.820    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeUtf8StringWrapped             thrpt        50  2634029.071    52304.876    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeUtf8ViaArray                  thrpt        50  3397049.332    57784.119    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeUtf8ViaArrayWrapped           thrpt        50  3318685.262    35869.562    ops/s
i.n.m.b.ByteBufUtilBenchmark.writeUtf8Wrapped                   thrpt        50  2473791.249    46423.114    ops/s
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1,387.417 sec - in io.netty.microbench.buffer.ByteBufUtilBenchmark

Results :

Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Results :

Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

The *ViaArray* benchmarks are basically doing a toString().getBytes(Charset) which the others are using ByteBufUtil.write*(...).
2014-12-26 15:58:18 +09:00
Norman Maurer
66294892a0 CompositeByteBuf.nioBuffers(...) must not return an empty ByteBuffer array
Motivation:

CompositeByteBuf.nioBuffers(...) returns an empty ByteBuffer array if the specified length is 0. This is not consistent with other ByteBuf implementations which return an ByteBuffer array of size 1 with an empty ByteBuffer included.

Modifications:

Make CompositeByteBuf.nioBuffers(...) consistent with other ByteBuf implementations.

Result:

Consistent and correct behaviour of nioBufffers(...)
2014-12-22 11:18:32 +01:00
Norman Maurer
a69a39c849 Always return SliceByteBuf on slice(...) to eliminate possible leak
Motivation:

When calling slice(...) on a ByteBuf the returned ByteBuf should be the slice of a ByteBuf and shares it's reference count. This is important as it is perfect legal to use buf.slice(...).release() and have both, the slice and the original ByteBuf released. At the moment this is only the case if the requested slice size is > 0. This makes the behavior inconsistent and so may lead to a memory leak.

Modifications:

- Never return Unpooled.EMPTY_BUFFER when calling slice(...).
- Adding test case for buffer.slice(...).release() and buffer.duplicate(...).release()

Result:

Consistent behaviour and so no more leaks possible.
2014-12-22 11:15:50 +01:00
Norman Maurer
182c91f06c Ensure buffer is not released when call array() / memoryAddress()
Motivation:

Before we missed to check if a buffer was released before we return the backing byte array or memoryaddress. This could lead to JVM crashes when someone tried various bulk operations on the Unsafe*ByteBuf implementations.

Modifications:

Always check if the buffer is released before all to return the byte array and memoryaddress.

Result:

No more JVM crashes because of released buffers when doing bulk operations on Unsafe*ByteBuf implementations.
2014-12-11 11:30:31 +01:00
Idel Pivnitskiy
35db3c6710 Small performance improvements
Motivation:

Found performance issues via FindBugs and PMD.

Modifications:

- Removed unnecessary boxing/unboxing operations in DefaultTextHeaders.convertToInt(CharSequence) and DefaultTextHeaders.convertToLong(CharSequence). A boxed primitive is created from a string, just to extract the unboxed primitive value.
- Added a static modifier for DefaultHttp2Connection.ParentChangedEvent class. This class is an inner class, but does not use its embedded reference to the object which created it. This reference makes the instances of the class larger, and may keep the reference to the creator object alive longer than necessary.
- Added a static compiled Pattern to avoid compile it each time it is used when we need to replace some part of authority.
- Improved using of StringBuilders.

Result:

Performance improvements.
2014-11-20 00:10:06 -05:00
Norman Maurer
48f1398869 Disable caching of PooledByteBuf for different threads.
Motivation:

We introduced a PoolThreadCache which is used in our PooledByteBufAllocator to reduce the synchronization overhead on PoolArenas when allocate / deallocate PooledByteBuf instances. This cache is used for both the allocation path and deallocation path by:
  - Look for cached memory in the PoolThreadCache for the Thread that tries to allocate a new PooledByteBuf and if one is found return it.
  - Add the memory that is used by a PooledByteBuf to the PoolThreadCache of the Thread that release the PooledByteBuf

This works out very well when all allocation / deallocation is done in the EventLoop as the EventLoop will be used for read and write. On the otherside this can lead to surprising side-effects if the user allocate from outside the EventLoop and and pass the ByteBuf over for writing. The problem here is that the memory will be added to the PoolThreadCache that did the actual write on the underlying transport and not on the Thread that previously allocated the buffer.

Modifications:

Don't cache if different Threads are used for allocating/deallocating

Result:

Less confusing behavior for users that allocate PooledByteBufs from outside the EventLoop.
2014-09-22 13:39:31 +02:00
Norman Maurer
858de5699b [#2924] Correctly update head in MemoryRegionCache.trim()
Motivation:
When MemoryRegionCache.trim() is called, some unused cache entries will be freed (started from head). However, in MeoryRegionCache.trim() the head is not updated, which make entry list's head point to an entry whose chunk is null now and following allocate of MeoryRegionCache will return false immediately.

In other word, cache is no longer usable once trim happen.

Modifications:

Update head to correct idx after free entries in trim().

Result:

MemoryRegionCache behaves correctly even after calling trim().
2014-09-22 11:04:21 +02:00
Norman Maurer
4e62b51c6d [#2843] Add test-case to show correct behavior of ByteBuf.refCnt() and ByteBuf.release(...)
Motivation:

We received a bug-report that the ByteBuf.refCnt() does sometimes not show the correct value when release() and refCnt() is called from different Threads.

Modifications:

Add test-case which shows that all is working like expected

Result:

Test-case added which shows everything is ok.
2014-09-01 08:50:21 +02:00
Trustin Lee
b5f61d0de5 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2014-08-16 03:27:42 +09:00
Trustin Lee
76ac3b21a5 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.0.Beta3 2014-08-16 03:27:37 +09:00
Trustin Lee
b3c1904cc9 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2014-08-15 09:31:03 +09:00
Trustin Lee
e013b2400f [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.0.Beta2 2014-08-15 09:30:59 +09:00
Trustin Lee
0dc6a8dccf Use heap buffers for Unpooled.copiedBuffer()
Related issue: #2028

Motivation:

Some copiedBuffer() methods in Unpooled allocated a direct buffer.  An
allocation of a direct buffer is an expensive operation, and thus should
be avoided for unpooled buffers.

Modifications:

- Use heap buffers in all copiedBuffer() methods

Result:

Unpooled.copiedBuffers() are less expensive now.
2014-08-13 15:10:11 -07:00
Norman Maurer
ef572d859d Change back default allocator to pooled.
Motivation:

While porting some changes from 4.0 to 4.1 and master branch I changed the default allocator from pooled to unpooled by mistake. This should be reverted. The guilty commit is 4a3ef90381.

Thanks to @blucas for spotting this.

Modifications:

Revert changes related to allocator.

Result:

Use the correct default allocator again.
2014-08-13 12:07:06 +02:00
Norman Maurer
869687bd71 Port ChannelOutboundBuffer and related changes from 4.0
Motivation:

We did various changes related to the ChannelOutboundBuffer in 4.0 branch. This commit port all of them over and so make sure our branches are synced in terms of these changes.

Related to [#2734], [#2709], [#2729], [#2710] and [#2693] .

Modification:
Port all changes that was done on the ChannelOutboundBuffer.

This includes the port of the following commits:
 - 73dfd7c01b
 - 997d8c32d2
 - e282e504f1
 - 5e5d1a58fd
 - 8ee3575e72
 - d6f0d12a86
 - 16e50765d1
 - 3f3e66c31a

Result:
 - Less memory usage by ChannelOutboundBuffer
 - Same code as in 4.0 branch
 - Make it possible to use ChannelOutboundBuffer with Channel implementation that not extends AbstractChannel
2014-08-05 15:00:45 +02:00
Trustin Lee
9a654d8a61 Remove duplicate range check in AbstractByteBuf.skipBytes() 2014-07-29 15:58:28 -07:00
Idel Pivnitskiy
ad1389be9d Small performance improvements
Modifications:

- Added a static modifier for CompositeByteBuf.Component.
This class is an inner class, but does not use its embedded reference to the object which created it. This reference makes the instances of the class larger, and may keep the reference to the creator object alive longer than necessary.
- Removed unnecessary boxing/unboxing operations in HttpResponseDecoder, RtspResponseDecoder, PerMessageDeflateClientExtensionHandshaker and PerMessageDeflateServerExtensionHandshaker
A boxed primitive is created from a String, just to extract the unboxed primitive value.
- Removed unnecessary 3 times calculations in DiskAttribute.addContent(...).
- Removed unnecessary checks if file exists before call mkdirs() in NativeLibraryLoader and PlatformDependent.
Because the method mkdirs() has this check inside.
- Removed unnecessary `instanceof AsciiString` check in StompSubframeAggregator.contentLength(StompHeadersSubframe) and StompSubframeDecoder.getContentLength(StompHeaders, long).
Because StompHeaders.get(CharSequence) always returns java.lang.String.
2014-07-20 09:26:04 +02:00
Norman Maurer
f88dfd0430 [#2653] Remove unnecessary ensureAccessible() calls
Motivation:

I introduced ensureAccessible() class as part of 6c47cc9711 in some places. Unfortunally I also added some where these are not needed and so caused a performance regression.

Modification:

Remove calls where not needed.

Result:

Fixed performance regression.
2014-07-14 21:04:12 +02:00
Norman Maurer
93c306602a [#2653] Remove uncessary range checks for performance reasons
Motivation:

I introduced range checks as part of 6c47cc9711 in some places. Unfortunally I also added some where these are not needed and so caused a performance regression.

Modification:

Remove range checks where not needed

Result:

Fixed performance regression.
2014-07-14 11:43:19 +02:00
Brendt Lucas
ac8ac59148 [#2642] CompositeByteBuf.deallocate memory/GC improvement
Motivation:

CompositeByteBuf.deallocate generates unnecessary GC pressure when using the 'foreach' loop, as a 'foreach' loop creates an iterator when looping.

Modification:

Convert 'foreach' loop into regular 'for' loop.

Result:

Less GC pressure (and possibly more throughput) as the 'for' loop does not create an iterator
2014-07-08 21:08:14 +02:00
Trustin Lee
e167b02d52 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration 2014-07-04 17:26:02 +09:00
Trustin Lee
ba50cb829b [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.0.Beta1 2014-07-04 17:25:54 +09:00
Trustin Lee
787663a644 [maven-release-plugin] rollback the release of netty-4.1.0.Beta1 2014-07-04 17:11:14 +09:00
Trustin Lee
83eae705e1 [maven-release-plugin] prepare release netty-4.1.0.Beta1 2014-07-04 17:02:17 +09:00
Trustin Lee
fbf1bdbef1 Fix the build timeout when 'leak' profile is active
Motivation:

AbstractByteBufTest.testInternalBuffer() uses writeByte() operations to
populate the sample data.  Usually, this isn't a problem, but it starts
to take a lot of time when the resource leak detection level gets
higher.

In our CI machine, testInternalBuffer() takes more than 30 minutes,
causing the build timeout when the 'leak' profile is active (paranoid
level resource detection.)

Modification:

Populate the sample data using ThreadLocalRandom.nextBytes() instead of
using millions of writeByte() operations.

Result:

Test runs much faster when leak detection level is high.
2014-07-03 17:55:10 +09:00
Trustin Lee
d0912f2709 Fix most inspector warnings
Motivation:

It's good to minimize potentially broken windows.

Modifications:

Fix most inspector warnings from our profile
Update IntObjectHashMap

Result:

Cleaner code
2014-07-02 19:55:07 +09:00
Norman Maurer
9594a81b95 [#2622] Correctly check reference count before try to work on the underlying memory
Motivation:

Because of how we use reference counting we need to check for the reference count before each operation that touches the underlying memory. This is especially true as we use sun.misc.Cleaner.clean() to release the memory ASAP when possible. Because of this the user may cause a SEGFAULT if an operation is called that tries to access the backing memory after it was released.

Modification:

Correctly check the reference count on all methods that access the underlying memory or expose it via a ByteBuffer.

Result:

Safer usage of ByteBuf
2014-06-30 07:14:25 +02:00
Trustin Lee
c0462c0c3b Optimize PoolChunk
- Using short[] for memoryMap did not improve performance. Reverting
  back to the original dual-byte[] structure in favor of simplicity.
- Optimize allocateRun() which yields small performence improvement
- Use local variable when member fields are accessed more than once
2014-06-26 17:06:10 +09:00
Trustin Lee
dbc011c3f4 Fix inspector warnings 2014-06-26 17:06:10 +09:00
Pavan Kumar
69a6ad940a Improve the allocation algorithm in PoolChunk
Motivation:

Depth-first search is not always efficient for buddy allocation.

Modification:

Employ a new faster search algorithm with different memoryMap layout.

Result:

With thread-local cache disabled, we see a lot of performance
improvment, especially when the size of the allocation is as small as
the page size, which had the largest search space previously.
2014-06-26 17:06:10 +09:00
Trustin Lee
41d44a8161 Remove 'get' prefix from all HTTP/SPDY messages
Motivation:

Persuit for the consistency in method naming

Modifications:

- Remove the 'get' prefix from all HTTP/SPDY message classes
- Fix some inspector warnings

Result:

Consistency
2014-06-24 18:03:33 +09:00
Norman Maurer
12a3e23e47 MessageToByteEncoder always starts with ByteBuf that use initalCapacity == 0
Motivation:

MessageToByteEncoder always starts with ByteBuf that use initalCapacity == 0 when preferDirect is used. This is really wasteful in terms of performance as every first write into the buffer will cause an expand of the buffer itself.

Modifications:

 - Change ByteBufAllocator.ioBuffer() use the same default initialCapacity as heapBuffer() and directBuffer()
 - Add new allocateBuffer method to MessageToByteEncoder that allow the user to do some smarter allocation based on the message that will be encoded.

Result:

Less expanding of buffer and more flexibilty when allocate the buffer for encoding.
2014-06-24 13:55:21 +09:00
Trustin Lee
37b07a04d4 Revert "Improve the allocation algorithm in PoolChunk"
This reverts commit 36305d7dce, which
seems to cause an assertion failure on our CI machine.
2014-06-21 19:19:35 +09:00
Pavan Kumar
6bd8c5d4d0 Improve the allocation algorithm in PoolChunk
Motivation:

Depth-first search is not always efficient for buddy allocation.

Modification:

Employ a new faster search algorithm with different memoryMap layout.

Result:

With thread-local cache disabled, we see a lot of performance
improvment, especially when the size of the allocation is as small as
the page size, which had the largest search space previously:

-- master head --
Benchmark                (size) Mode    Score  Error Units
pooledDirectAllocAndFree  8192 thrpt  215.392  1.565 ops/ms
pooledDirectAllocAndFree 16384 thrpt  594.625  2.154 ops/ms
pooledDirectAllocAndFree 65536 thrpt 1221.520 18.965 ops/ms
pooledHeapAllocAndFree    8192 thrpt  217.175  1.653 ops/ms
pooledHeapAllocAndFree   16384 thrpt  587.250 14.827 ops/ms
pooledHeapAllocAndFree   65536 thrpt 1217.023 44.963 ops/ms

-- changes --
Benchmark                (size) Mode    Score  Error Units
pooledDirectAllocAndFree  8192 thrpt 3656.744 94.093 ops/ms
pooledDirectAllocAndFree 16384 thrpt 4087.152 22.921 ops/ms
pooledDirectAllocAndFree 65536 thrpt 4058.814 29.276 ops/ms
pooledHeapAllocAndFree    8192 thrpt 3640.355 44.418 ops/ms
pooledHeapAllocAndFree   16384 thrpt 4030.206 24.365 ops/ms
pooledHeapAllocAndFree   65536 thrpt 4103.991 70.991 ops/ms
2014-06-21 13:20:25 +09:00
Norman Maurer
f05510063e Remove System.out.println(...) debug messages 2014-06-20 19:42:38 +02:00
Norman Maurer
371f8066d2 [#2580] [#2587] Fix buffer corruption regression when ByteBuf.order(LITTLE_ENDIAN) is used
Motivation:

To improve the speed of ByteBuf with order LITTLE_ENDIAN and where the native order is also LITTLE_ENDIAN (intel) we introduces a new special SwappedByteBuf before in commit 4ad3984c8b. Unfortunally the commit has a flaw which does not handle correctly the case when a ByteBuf expands. This was caused because the memoryAddress was cached and never changed again even if the underlying buffer expanded. This can lead to corrupt data or even to SEGFAULT the JVM if you are lucky enough.

Modification:

Always lookup the actual memoryAddress of the wrapped ByteBuf.

Result:

No more data-corruption for ByteBuf with order LITTLE_ENDIAN and no JVM crashes.
2014-06-20 18:24:44 +02:00
Trustin Lee
085a61a310 Refactor FastThreadLocal to simplify TLV management
Motivation:

When Netty runs in a managed environment such as web application server,
Netty needs to provide an explicit way to remove the thread-local
variables it created to prevent class loader leaks.

FastThreadLocal uses different execution paths for storing a
thread-local variable depending on the type of the current thread.
It increases the complexity of thread-local removal.

Modifications:

- Moved FastThreadLocal and FastThreadLocalThread out of the internal
  package so that a user can use it.
- FastThreadLocal now keeps track of all thread local variables it has
  initialized, and calling FastThreadLocal.removeAll() will remove all
  thread-local variables of the caller thread.
- Added FastThreadLocal.size() for diagnostics and tests
- Introduce InternalThreadLocalMap which is a mixture of hard-wired
  thread local variable fields and extensible indexed variables
- FastThreadLocal now uses InternalThreadLocalMap to implement a
  thread-local variable.
- Added ThreadDeathWatcher.unwatch() so that PooledByteBufAllocator
  tells it to stop watching when its thread-local cache has been freed
  by FastThreadLocal.removeAll().
- Added FastThreadLocalTest to ensure that removeAll() works
- Added microbenchmark for FastThreadLocal and JDK ThreadLocal
- Upgraded to JMH 0.9

Result:

- A user can remove all thread-local variables Netty created, as long as
  he or she did not exit from the current thread. (Note that there's no
  way to remove a thread-local variable from outside of the thread.)
- FastThreadLocal exposes more useful operations such as isSet() because
  we always implement a thread local variable via InternalThreadLocalMap
  instead of falling back to JDK ThreadLocal.
- FastThreadLocalBenchmark shows that this change improves the
  performance of FastThreadLocal even more.
2014-06-19 21:13:55 +09:00
Norman Maurer
ad86ec798d Move calculateNewCapacity(...) to ByteBufAllocator
Motivation:

Currently we have the algorithm of calculate the new capacity of a ByteBuf implemented in AbstractByteBuf. The problem with this is that it is impossible for a user to change it if it not fits well it's use-case. We should better move it to ByteBufAllocator and so let the user implement it's own by either write his/her own ByteBufAllocator or just override the default implementation in one of our provided ByteBufAllocators.

Modifications:

Move calculateNewCapacity(...) to ByteBufAllocator and move the implementation (which was part of AbstractByteBuf) to AbstractByteBufAllocator.

Result:

The user can now override the default calculation algorithm when needed.
2014-06-17 09:35:45 +02:00
Norman Maurer
066f95d047 [#2573] UnpooledUnsafeDirectByteBuf.setBytes(int,ByteBuf,int,int) fails to use fast-path when src has array
Motivation:

UnpooledUnsafeDirectByteBuf.setBytes(int,ByteBuf,int,int) fails to use fast-path when src uses an array as backing storage. This is because the if else uses the wrong ByteBuf for its check.

Modifications:

- Use correct ByteBuf when check for array as backing storage
- Also eliminate unecessary check in UnpooledDirectByteBuf which always fails anyway

Result:

Faster setBytes(...) when src ByteBuf is backed by an array.

No more IndexOutOfBoundsException or data-corruption.
2014-06-16 11:11:41 +02:00
belliottsmith
2a2a21ec59 Introduce FastThreadLocal which uses an EnumMap and a predefined fixed set of possible thread locals
Motivation:
Provide a faster ThreadLocal implementation

Modification:
Add a "FastThreadLocal" which uses an EnumMap and a predefined fixed set of possible thread locals (all of the static instances created by netty) that is around 10-20% faster than standard ThreadLocal in my benchmarks (and can be seen having an effect in the direct PooledByteBufAllocator benchmark that uses the DEFAULT ByteBufAllocator which uses this FastThreadLocal, as opposed to normal instantiations that do not, and in the new RecyclableArrayList benchmark);

Result:
Improved performance
2014-06-13 10:56:18 +02:00
Norman Maurer
61dbc353ca [#2436] Unsafe*ByteBuf implementation should only invert bytes if ByteOrder differ from native ByteOrder
Motivation:
Our Unsafe*ByteBuf implementation always invert bytes when the native ByteOrder is LITTLE_ENDIAN (this is true on intel), even when the user calls order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN). This is not optimal for performance reasons as the user should be able to set the ByteOrder to LITTLE_ENDIAN and so write bytes without the extra inverting.

Modification:
- Introduce a new special SwappedByteBuf (called UnsafeDirectSwappedByteBuf) that is used by all the Unsafe*ByteBuf implementation and allows to write without inverting the bytes.
- Add benchmark
- Upgrade jmh to 0.8

Result:
The user is be able to get the max performance even on servers that have ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN as their native ByteOrder.
2014-06-05 10:59:22 +02:00
Trustin Lee
7d9374a582 Use Java 5 foreach for arrays for brevity at no cost 2014-06-02 18:25:25 +09:00
Trustin Lee
af4c30fa56 Remove the deprecated constructor 2014-06-02 18:24:19 +09:00