0f42eb1ceb
Motivation: In Java, it is almost always at least slower to use `ByteBuffer` than `byte[]` without pooling or I/O. `QueryStringDecoder` can use `byte[]` with arguably simpler code. Modification: Replace `ByteBuffer` / `CharsetDecoder` with `byte[]` and `new String` Result: After ``` Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units QueryStringDecoderBenchmark.noDecoding thrpt 6 5.612 ± 2.639 ops/us QueryStringDecoderBenchmark.onlyDecoding thrpt 6 1.393 ± 0.067 ops/us QueryStringDecoderBenchmark.mixedDecoding thrpt 6 1.223 ± 0.048 ops/us ``` Before ``` Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units QueryStringDecoderBenchmark.noDecoding thrpt 6 6.123 ± 0.250 ops/us QueryStringDecoderBenchmark.onlyDecoding thrpt 6 0.922 ± 0.159 ops/us QueryStringDecoderBenchmark.mixedDecoding thrpt 6 1.032 ± 0.178 ops/us ``` I notice #6781 switched from an array to `ByteBuffer` but I can't find any motivation for that in the PR. Unit tests pass fine with an array and we get a reasonable speed bump. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .github | ||
| .mvn | ||
| all | ||
| bom | ||
| buffer | ||
| codec | ||
| codec-dns | ||
| codec-haproxy | ||
| codec-http | ||
| codec-http2 | ||
| codec-memcache | ||
| codec-mqtt | ||
| codec-redis | ||
| codec-smtp | ||
| codec-socks | ||
| codec-stomp | ||
| codec-xml | ||
| common | ||
| dev-tools | ||
| docker | ||
| example | ||
| handler | ||
| handler-proxy | ||
| license | ||
| microbench | ||
| resolver | ||
| resolver-dns | ||
| resolver-dns-native-macos | ||
| tarball | ||
| testsuite | ||
| testsuite-autobahn | ||
| testsuite-http2 | ||
| testsuite-native-image | ||
| testsuite-osgi | ||
| testsuite-shading | ||
| transport | ||
| transport-blockhound-tests | ||
| transport-native-epoll | ||
| transport-native-kqueue | ||
| transport-native-unix-common | ||
| transport-native-unix-common-tests | ||
| transport-sctp | ||
| .fbprefs | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| LICENSE.txt | ||
| mvnw | ||
| mvnw.cmd | ||
| NOTICE.txt | ||
| pom.xml | ||
| README.md | ||
| run-example.sh | ||
Netty Project
Netty is an asynchronous event-driven network application framework for rapid development of maintainable high performance protocol servers & clients.
Links
How to build
For the detailed information about building and developing Netty, please visit the developer guide. This page only gives very basic information.
You require the following to build Netty:
- Latest stable Oracle JDK 7
- Latest stable Apache Maven
- If you are on Linux, you need additional development packages installed on your system, because you'll build the native transport.
Note that this is build-time requirement. JDK 5 (for 3.x) or 6 (for 4.0+) is enough to run your Netty-based application.
Branches to look
Development of all versions takes place in each branch whose name is identical to <majorVersion>.<minorVersion>. For example, the development of 3.9 and 4.0 resides in the branch '3.9' and the branch '4.0' respectively.
Usage with JDK 9
Netty can be used in modular JDK9 applications as a collection of automatic modules. The module names follow the reverse-DNS style, and are derived from subproject names rather than root packages due to historical reasons. They are listed below:
io.netty.allio.netty.bufferio.netty.codecio.netty.codec.dnsio.netty.codec.haproxyio.netty.codec.httpio.netty.codec.http2io.netty.codec.memcacheio.netty.codec.mqttio.netty.codec.redisio.netty.codec.smtpio.netty.codec.socksio.netty.codec.stompio.netty.codec.xmlio.netty.commonio.netty.handlerio.netty.handler.proxyio.netty.resolverio.netty.resolver.dnsio.netty.transportio.netty.transport.epoll(nativeomitted - reserved keyword in Java)io.netty.transport.kqueue(nativeomitted - reserved keyword in Java)io.netty.transport.unix.common(nativeomitted - reserved keyword in Java)io.netty.transport.rxtxio.netty.transport.sctpio.netty.transport.udt
Automatic modules do not provide any means to declare dependencies, so you need to list each used module separately
in your module-info file.