netty5/example
Norman Maurer 5c879bc963
Don't take Promise as argument in Channel API. (#11346)
Motivation:

At the moment the outbound operations of ChannelHandler take a Promise as argument. This Promise needs to be carried forward to the next handler in the pipeline until it hits the transport. This is API choice has a few quirks which we should aim to remove:

 - There is a difference between if you add a FutureListener to the Promise or the Future that is returned by the outbound method in terms of the ordering of execution of the listeners. Sometimes we add the listener to the promise while in reality we usually always want to add it to the future to ensure the listerns are executed in the "correct order".
- It is quite easy to "loose" a promise by forgetting to use the right method which also takes a promise
- We have no idea what EventExecutor is used for the passed in Promise which may invalid our assumption of threading.

While changing the method signature of the outbound operations of the ChannelHandler is a good step forward we should also take care of just remove all the methods from ChannelOutboundInvoker (and its sub-types) that take a Promise and just always use the methods that return a Future only.

Modifications:

- Change the signature of the methods that took a Promise to not take one anymore and just return a Future
- Remove all operations for ChannelOutboundInvoker that take a Promise.
- Adjust all code to cope with the API changes

Result:

Cleaner API which is easier to reason about and easier to use.
2021-08-25 14:12:33 +02:00
..
src/main Don't take Promise as argument in Channel API. (#11346) 2021-08-25 14:12:33 +02:00
.gitignore [#844] [#867] Add UDT transport 2013-01-07 21:06:22 +01:00
pom.xml Use the standard japicmp.skip instead of the custom skipJapicmp (#11558) 2021-08-10 09:07:04 +02:00