Scott Mitchell 82b617dfe9 retainSlice() unwrap ByteBuf ... Motivation: retainSlice() currently does not unwrap the ByteBuf when creating the ByteBuf wrapper. This effectivley forms a linked list of ByteBuf when it is only necessary to maintain a reference to the unwrapped ByteBuf. Modifications: - retainSlice() and retainDuplicate() variants should only maintain a reference to the unwrapped ByteBuf - create new unit tests which generally verify the retainSlice() behavior - Remove unecessary generic arguments from AbstractPooledDerivedByteBuf - Remove unecessary int length member variable from the unpooled sliced ByteBuf implementation - Rename the unpooled sliced/derived ByteBuf to include Unpooled in their name to be more consistent with the Pooled variants Result: Fixes https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/5582		2016-07-29 11:16:44 -07:00
..
src	retainSlice() unwrap ByteBuf	2016-07-29 11:16:44 -07:00
pom.xml	[maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration	2016-07-27 13:29:56 +02:00