fe05b6e514
Motivation: There's no way to generate the name of a handler being newly added automatically and reliably. For example, let's say you have a routine that adds a set of handlers to a pipeline using addBefore() or addAfter(). Because addBefore() and addAfter() always require non-conflicting non-null handler name, making the multiple invocation of the routine on the same pipeline is non-trivial. Modifications: - If a user specifies null as the name of the new handler, DefaultChannelPipeline generates one. - Update the documentation of ChannelPipeline to match the new behavior Result: A user doesn't need to worry about name conflicts anymore. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
src | ||
pom.xml |