rocksdb/db/table_properties_collector.h

96 lines
2.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) 2013, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
// This source code is licensed under the BSD-style license found in the
// LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. An additional grant
// of patent rights can be found in the PATENTS file in the same directory.
//
// This file defines a collection of statistics collectors.
#pragma once
#include "rocksdb/table_properties.h"
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
namespace rocksdb {
struct InternalKeyTablePropertiesNames {
static const std::string kDeletedKeys;
};
// Collecting the statistics for internal keys. Visible only by internal
// rocksdb modules.
class InternalKeyPropertiesCollector : public TablePropertiesCollector {
public:
virtual Status Add(const Slice& key, const Slice& value) override;
virtual Status Finish(UserCollectedProperties* properties) override;
virtual const char* Name() const override {
return "InternalKeyPropertiesCollector";
}
UserCollectedProperties GetReadableProperties() const override;
private:
uint64_t deleted_keys_ = 0;
};
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
2014-05-13 21:30:55 +02:00
class InternalKeyPropertiesCollectorFactory
: public TablePropertiesCollectorFactory {
public:
virtual TablePropertiesCollector* CreateTablePropertiesCollector() override {
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
2014-05-13 21:30:55 +02:00
return new InternalKeyPropertiesCollector();
}
virtual const char* Name() const override {
return "InternalKeyPropertiesCollectorFactory";
}
};
// When rocksdb creates a new table, it will encode all "user keys" into
// "internal keys", which contains meta information of a given entry.
//
// This class extracts user key from the encoded internal key when Add() is
// invoked.
class UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector : public TablePropertiesCollector {
public:
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
2014-05-13 21:30:55 +02:00
// transfer of ownership
explicit UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector(TablePropertiesCollector* collector)
: collector_(collector) {}
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
2014-05-13 21:30:55 +02:00
virtual ~UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector() {}
virtual Status Add(const Slice& key, const Slice& value) override;
virtual Status Finish(UserCollectedProperties* properties) override;
virtual const char* Name() const override { return collector_->Name(); }
UserCollectedProperties GetReadableProperties() const override;
protected:
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
2014-05-13 21:30:55 +02:00
std::unique_ptr<TablePropertiesCollector> collector_;
};
class UserKeyTablePropertiesCollectorFactory
: public TablePropertiesCollectorFactory {
public:
explicit UserKeyTablePropertiesCollectorFactory(
std::shared_ptr<TablePropertiesCollectorFactory> user_collector_factory)
: user_collector_factory_(user_collector_factory) {}
virtual TablePropertiesCollector* CreateTablePropertiesCollector() override {
TablePropertiesCollectorFactory Summary: This diff addresses task #4296714 and rethinks how users provide us with TablePropertiesCollectors as part of Options. Here's description of task #4296714: I'm debugging #4295529 and noticed that our count of user properties kDeletedKeys is wrong. We're sharing one single InternalKeyPropertiesCollector with all Table Builders. In LOG Files, we're outputting number of kDeletedKeys as connected with a single table, while it's actually the total count of deleted keys since creation of the DB. For example, this table has 3155 entries and 1391828 deleted keys. The problem with current approach that we call methods on a single TablePropertiesCollector for all the tables we create. Even worse, we could do it from multiple threads at the same time and TablePropertiesCollector has no way of knowing which table we're calling it for. Good part: Looks like nobody inside Facebook is using Options::table_properties_collectors. This means we should be able to painfully change the API. In this change, I introduce TablePropertiesCollectorFactory. For every table we create, we call `CreateTablePropertiesCollector`, which creates a TablePropertiesCollector for a single table. We then use it sequentially from a single thread, which means it doesn't have to be thread-safe. Test Plan: Added a test in table_properties_collector_test that fails on master (build two tables, assert that kDeletedKeys count is correct for the second one). Also, all other tests Reviewers: sdong, dhruba, haobo, kailiu Reviewed By: kailiu CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18579
2014-05-13 21:30:55 +02:00
return new UserKeyTablePropertiesCollector(
user_collector_factory_->CreateTablePropertiesCollector());
}
virtual const char* Name() const override {
return user_collector_factory_->Name();
}
private:
std::shared_ptr<TablePropertiesCollectorFactory> user_collector_factory_;
};
} // namespace rocksdb