rocksdb/table/block_based/uncompression_dict_reader.cc

121 lines
3.9 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
//
#include "table/block_based/uncompression_dict_reader.h"
#include "monitoring/perf_context_imp.h"
#include "table/block_based/block_based_table_reader.h"
#include "util/compression.h"
namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE {
Status UncompressionDictReader::Create(
const BlockBasedTable* table, FilePrefetchBuffer* prefetch_buffer,
bool use_cache, bool prefetch, bool pin,
BlockCacheLookupContext* lookup_context,
std::unique_ptr<UncompressionDictReader>* uncompression_dict_reader) {
assert(table);
assert(table->get_rep());
assert(!pin || prefetch);
assert(uncompression_dict_reader);
CachableEntry<UncompressionDict> uncompression_dict;
if (prefetch || !use_cache) {
const Status s = ReadUncompressionDictionary(
Fix regression affecting partitioned indexes/filters when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false (#5705) Summary: PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5298 (and subsequent related patches) unintentionally changed the semantics of cache_index_and_filter_blocks: historically, this option only affected the main index/filter block; with the changes, it affects index/filter partitions as well. This can cause performance issues when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false since in this case, partitions are neither cached nor preloaded (i.e. they are loaded on demand upon each access). The patch reverts to the earlier behavior, that is, partitions are cached similarly to data blocks regardless of the value of the above option. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5705 Test Plan: make check ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=30 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false ./db_bench -benchmarks=readrandom --use_existing_db --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=10 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false --cache_size=8000000000 Relevant statistics from the readrandom benchmark with the old code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 With the new code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 42696 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 4050048 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 4550493 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 10331040 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 Differential Revision: D16817382 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: 28a516b0da1f041a03313e0b70b28cf5cf205d00
2019-08-15 03:13:14 +02:00
table, prefetch_buffer, ReadOptions(), use_cache,
nullptr /* get_context */, lookup_context, &uncompression_dict);
if (!s.ok()) {
return s;
}
if (use_cache && !pin) {
uncompression_dict.Reset();
}
}
uncompression_dict_reader->reset(
new UncompressionDictReader(table, std::move(uncompression_dict)));
return Status::OK();
}
Status UncompressionDictReader::ReadUncompressionDictionary(
const BlockBasedTable* table, FilePrefetchBuffer* prefetch_buffer,
Fix regression affecting partitioned indexes/filters when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false (#5705) Summary: PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5298 (and subsequent related patches) unintentionally changed the semantics of cache_index_and_filter_blocks: historically, this option only affected the main index/filter block; with the changes, it affects index/filter partitions as well. This can cause performance issues when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false since in this case, partitions are neither cached nor preloaded (i.e. they are loaded on demand upon each access). The patch reverts to the earlier behavior, that is, partitions are cached similarly to data blocks regardless of the value of the above option. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5705 Test Plan: make check ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=30 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false ./db_bench -benchmarks=readrandom --use_existing_db --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=10 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false --cache_size=8000000000 Relevant statistics from the readrandom benchmark with the old code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 With the new code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 42696 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 4050048 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 4550493 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 10331040 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 Differential Revision: D16817382 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: 28a516b0da1f041a03313e0b70b28cf5cf205d00
2019-08-15 03:13:14 +02:00
const ReadOptions& read_options, bool use_cache, GetContext* get_context,
BlockCacheLookupContext* lookup_context,
CachableEntry<UncompressionDict>* uncompression_dict) {
// TODO: add perf counter for compression dictionary read time
assert(table);
assert(uncompression_dict);
assert(uncompression_dict->IsEmpty());
const BlockBasedTable::Rep* const rep = table->get_rep();
assert(rep);
assert(!rep->compression_dict_handle.IsNull());
const Status s = table->RetrieveBlock(
prefetch_buffer, read_options, rep->compression_dict_handle,
UncompressionDict::GetEmptyDict(), uncompression_dict,
Fix regression affecting partitioned indexes/filters when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false (#5705) Summary: PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5298 (and subsequent related patches) unintentionally changed the semantics of cache_index_and_filter_blocks: historically, this option only affected the main index/filter block; with the changes, it affects index/filter partitions as well. This can cause performance issues when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false since in this case, partitions are neither cached nor preloaded (i.e. they are loaded on demand upon each access). The patch reverts to the earlier behavior, that is, partitions are cached similarly to data blocks regardless of the value of the above option. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5705 Test Plan: make check ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=30 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false ./db_bench -benchmarks=readrandom --use_existing_db --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=10 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false --cache_size=8000000000 Relevant statistics from the readrandom benchmark with the old code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 With the new code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 42696 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 4050048 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 4550493 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 10331040 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 Differential Revision: D16817382 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: 28a516b0da1f041a03313e0b70b28cf5cf205d00
2019-08-15 03:13:14 +02:00
BlockType::kCompressionDictionary, get_context, lookup_context,
/* for_compaction */ false, use_cache);
if (!s.ok()) {
ROCKS_LOG_WARN(
rep->ioptions.info_log,
"Encountered error while reading data from compression dictionary "
"block %s",
s.ToString().c_str());
}
return s;
}
Status UncompressionDictReader::GetOrReadUncompressionDictionary(
FilePrefetchBuffer* prefetch_buffer, bool no_io, GetContext* get_context,
BlockCacheLookupContext* lookup_context,
CachableEntry<UncompressionDict>* uncompression_dict) const {
assert(uncompression_dict);
if (!uncompression_dict_.IsEmpty()) {
uncompression_dict->SetUnownedValue(uncompression_dict_.GetValue());
return Status::OK();
}
ReadOptions read_options;
if (no_io) {
read_options.read_tier = kBlockCacheTier;
}
return ReadUncompressionDictionary(table_, prefetch_buffer, read_options,
cache_dictionary_blocks(), get_context,
lookup_context, uncompression_dict);
}
size_t UncompressionDictReader::ApproximateMemoryUsage() const {
assert(!uncompression_dict_.GetOwnValue() ||
uncompression_dict_.GetValue() != nullptr);
size_t usage = uncompression_dict_.GetOwnValue()
? uncompression_dict_.GetValue()->ApproximateMemoryUsage()
: 0;
#ifdef ROCKSDB_MALLOC_USABLE_SIZE
usage += malloc_usable_size(const_cast<UncompressionDictReader*>(this));
#else
usage += sizeof(*this);
#endif // ROCKSDB_MALLOC_USABLE_SIZE
return usage;
}
Fix regression affecting partitioned indexes/filters when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false (#5705) Summary: PR https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/5298 (and subsequent related patches) unintentionally changed the semantics of cache_index_and_filter_blocks: historically, this option only affected the main index/filter block; with the changes, it affects index/filter partitions as well. This can cause performance issues when cache_index_and_filter_blocks is false since in this case, partitions are neither cached nor preloaded (i.e. they are loaded on demand upon each access). The patch reverts to the earlier behavior, that is, partitions are cached similarly to data blocks regardless of the value of the above option. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5705 Test Plan: make check ./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=30 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false ./db_bench -benchmarks=readrandom --use_existing_db --statistics --stats_interval_seconds=1 --duration=10 --num=500000000 --bloom_bits=20 --partition_index_and_filters=true --cache_index_and_filter_blocks=false --cache_size=8000000000 Relevant statistics from the readrandom benchmark with the old code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 With the new code: rocksdb.block.cache.index.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.hit COUNT : 42696 rocksdb.block.cache.index.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.insert COUNT : 4050048 rocksdb.block.cache.index.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.miss COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.hit COUNT : 4550493 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.add COUNT : 2500 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.insert COUNT : 10331040 rocksdb.block.cache.filter.bytes.evict COUNT : 0 Differential Revision: D16817382 Pulled By: ltamasi fbshipit-source-id: 28a516b0da1f041a03313e0b70b28cf5cf205d00
2019-08-15 03:13:14 +02:00
bool UncompressionDictReader::cache_dictionary_blocks() const {
assert(table_);
assert(table_->get_rep());
return table_->get_rep()->table_options.cache_index_and_filter_blocks;
}
} // namespace ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE