rocksdb/java/Makefile

330 lines
12 KiB
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Improve RocksJava Comparator (#6252) Summary: This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy. **NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into. Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`). In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`. In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`. --- [JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java. With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425). These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical. --- These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x. ``` ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252 Differential Revision: D19331064 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
2020-02-03 21:28:25 +01:00
NATIVE_JAVA_CLASSES = \
org.rocksdb.AbstractCompactionFilter\
org.rocksdb.AbstractCompactionFilterFactory\
Improve RocksJava Comparator (#6252) Summary: This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy. **NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into. Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`). In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`. In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`. --- [JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java. With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425). These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical. --- These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x. ``` ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252 Differential Revision: D19331064 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
2020-02-03 21:28:25 +01:00
org.rocksdb.AbstractComparator\
org.rocksdb.AbstractEventListener\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.AbstractSlice\
org.rocksdb.AbstractTableFilter\
org.rocksdb.AbstractTraceWriter\
org.rocksdb.AbstractTransactionNotifier\
org.rocksdb.AbstractWalFilter\
org.rocksdb.BackupEngine\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.BackupableDBOptions\
org.rocksdb.BlockBasedTableConfig\
org.rocksdb.BloomFilter\
org.rocksdb.Checkpoint\
org.rocksdb.ClockCache\
org.rocksdb.CassandraCompactionFilter\
org.rocksdb.CassandraValueMergeOperator\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.ColumnFamilyHandle\
org.rocksdb.ColumnFamilyOptions\
org.rocksdb.CompactionJobInfo\
org.rocksdb.CompactionJobStats\
org.rocksdb.CompactionOptions\
org.rocksdb.CompactionOptionsFIFO\
org.rocksdb.CompactionOptionsUniversal\
org.rocksdb.CompactRangeOptions\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.ComparatorOptions\
org.rocksdb.CompressionOptions\
org.rocksdb.ConfigOptions\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.DBOptions\
org.rocksdb.DirectSlice\
org.rocksdb.Env\
org.rocksdb.EnvOptions\
org.rocksdb.FlushOptions\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.Filter\
org.rocksdb.IngestExternalFileOptions\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.HashLinkedListMemTableConfig\
org.rocksdb.HashSkipListMemTableConfig\
org.rocksdb.HdfsEnv\
org.rocksdb.ConcurrentTaskLimiter\
org.rocksdb.ConcurrentTaskLimiterImpl\
org.rocksdb.Logger\
org.rocksdb.LRUCache\
org.rocksdb.MemoryUsageType\
org.rocksdb.MemoryUtil\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.MergeOperator\
org.rocksdb.NativeComparatorWrapper\
org.rocksdb.OptimisticTransactionDB\
org.rocksdb.OptimisticTransactionOptions\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.Options\
org.rocksdb.OptionsUtil\
org.rocksdb.PersistentCache\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.PlainTableConfig\
org.rocksdb.RateLimiter\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.ReadOptions\
org.rocksdb.RemoveEmptyValueCompactionFilter\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.RestoreOptions\
org.rocksdb.RocksCallbackObject\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.RocksDB\
org.rocksdb.RocksEnv\
org.rocksdb.RocksIterator\
org.rocksdb.RocksMemEnv\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.SkipListMemTableConfig\
org.rocksdb.Slice\
org.rocksdb.SstFileManager\
org.rocksdb.SstFileWriter\
org.rocksdb.SstFileReader\
org.rocksdb.SstFileReaderIterator\
org.rocksdb.SstPartitionerFactory\
org.rocksdb.SstPartitionerFixedPrefixFactory\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.Statistics\
org.rocksdb.ThreadStatus\
org.rocksdb.TimedEnv\
org.rocksdb.Transaction\
org.rocksdb.TransactionDB\
org.rocksdb.TransactionDBOptions\
org.rocksdb.TransactionOptions\
2015-01-25 22:05:29 +01:00
org.rocksdb.TransactionLogIterator\
2014-11-17 19:22:44 +01:00
org.rocksdb.TtlDB\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.VectorMemTableConfig\
org.rocksdb.Snapshot\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.StringAppendOperator\
org.rocksdb.UInt64AddOperator\
2014-11-09 20:08:35 +01:00
org.rocksdb.WriteBatch\
org.rocksdb.WriteBatch.Handler\
org.rocksdb.WriteOptions\
org.rocksdb.WriteBatchWithIndex\
org.rocksdb.WriteBufferManager\
org.rocksdb.WBWIRocksIterator
2014-05-14 07:22:21 +02:00
NATIVE_JAVA_TEST_CLASSES = org.rocksdb.RocksDBExceptionTest\
org.rocksdb.NativeComparatorWrapperTest.NativeStringComparatorWrapper\
org.rocksdb.WriteBatchTest\
org.rocksdb.WriteBatchTestInternalHelper
ROCKSDB_MAJOR = $(shell egrep "ROCKSDB_MAJOR.[0-9]" ../include/rocksdb/version.h | cut -d ' ' -f 3)
ROCKSDB_MINOR = $(shell egrep "ROCKSDB_MINOR.[0-9]" ../include/rocksdb/version.h | cut -d ' ' -f 3)
ROCKSDB_PATCH = $(shell egrep "ROCKSDB_PATCH.[0-9]" ../include/rocksdb/version.h | cut -d ' ' -f 3)
NATIVE_INCLUDE = ./include
ARCH := $(shell getconf LONG_BIT)
ROCKSDB_JAR = rocksdbjni-$(ROCKSDB_MAJOR).$(ROCKSDB_MINOR).$(ROCKSDB_PATCH)-linux$(ARCH).jar
ifeq ($(PLATFORM), OS_MACOSX)
ROCKSDB_JAR = rocksdbjni-$(ROCKSDB_MAJOR).$(ROCKSDB_MINOR).$(ROCKSDB_PATCH)-osx.jar
endif
Improve RocksJava Comparator (#6252) Summary: This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy. **NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into. Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`). In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`. In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`. --- [JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java. With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425). These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical. --- These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x. ``` ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252 Differential Revision: D19331064 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
2020-02-03 21:28:25 +01:00
JAVA_TESTS = \
org.rocksdb.BackupableDBOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.BackupEngineTest\
org.rocksdb.BlockBasedTableConfigTest\
Improve RocksJava Comparator (#6252) Summary: This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy. **NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into. Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`). In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`. In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`. --- [JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java. With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425). These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical. --- These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x. ``` ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252 Differential Revision: D19331064 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
2020-02-03 21:28:25 +01:00
org.rocksdb.BuiltinComparatorTest\
org.rocksdb.util.BytewiseComparatorTest\
Improve RocksJava Comparator (#6252) Summary: This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy. **NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into. Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`). In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`. In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`. --- [JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java. With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425). These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical. --- These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x. ``` ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252 Differential Revision: D19331064 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
2020-02-03 21:28:25 +01:00
org.rocksdb.util.BytewiseComparatorIntTest\
org.rocksdb.CheckPointTest\
org.rocksdb.ClockCacheTest\
org.rocksdb.ColumnFamilyOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.ColumnFamilyTest\
org.rocksdb.CompactionFilterFactoryTest\
org.rocksdb.CompactionJobInfoTest\
org.rocksdb.CompactionJobStatsTest\
org.rocksdb.CompactionOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.CompactionOptionsFIFOTest\
org.rocksdb.CompactionOptionsUniversalTest\
org.rocksdb.CompactionPriorityTest\
org.rocksdb.CompactionStopStyleTest\
org.rocksdb.ComparatorOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.CompressionOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.CompressionTypesTest\
org.rocksdb.DBOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.DirectSliceTest\
Improve RocksJava Comparator (#6252) Summary: This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy. **NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into. Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`). In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`. In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`. --- [JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java. With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425). These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical. --- These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x. ``` ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252 Differential Revision: D19331064 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
2020-02-03 21:28:25 +01:00
org.rocksdb.util.EnvironmentTest\
org.rocksdb.EnvOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.EventListenerTest\
org.rocksdb.HdfsEnvTest\
org.rocksdb.IngestExternalFileOptionsTest\
Improve RocksJava Comparator (#6252) Summary: This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy. **NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into. Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`). In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`. In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`. --- [JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java. With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425). These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical. --- These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x. ``` ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252 Differential Revision: D19331064 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
2020-02-03 21:28:25 +01:00
org.rocksdb.util.IntComparatorTest\
org.rocksdb.util.JNIComparatorTest\
org.rocksdb.FilterTest\
org.rocksdb.FlushTest\
org.rocksdb.InfoLogLevelTest\
org.rocksdb.KeyMayExistTest\
org.rocksdb.ConcurrentTaskLimiterTest\
org.rocksdb.LoggerTest\
org.rocksdb.LRUCacheTest\
org.rocksdb.MemoryUtilTest\
org.rocksdb.MemTableTest\
org.rocksdb.MergeTest\
org.rocksdb.MixedOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.MutableColumnFamilyOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.MutableDBOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.NativeComparatorWrapperTest\
org.rocksdb.NativeLibraryLoaderTest\
org.rocksdb.OptimisticTransactionTest\
org.rocksdb.OptimisticTransactionDBTest\
org.rocksdb.OptimisticTransactionOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.OptionsUtilTest\
org.rocksdb.OptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.PlainTableConfigTest\
org.rocksdb.RateLimiterTest\
org.rocksdb.ReadOnlyTest\
org.rocksdb.ReadOptionsTest\
Improve RocksJava Comparator (#6252) Summary: This is a redesign of the API for RocksJava comparators with the aim of improving performance. It also simplifies the class hierarchy. **NOTE**: This breaks backwards compatibility for existing 3rd party Comparators implemented in Java... so we need to consider carefully which release branches this goes into. Previously when implementing a comparator in Java the developer had a choice of subclassing either `DirectComparator` or `Comparator` which would use direct and non-direct byte-buffers resepectively (via `DirectSlice` and `Slice`). In this redesign there we have eliminated the overhead of using the Java Slice classes, and just use `ByteBuffer`s. The `ComparatorOptions` supplied when constructing a Comparator allow you to choose between direct and non-direct byte buffers by setting `useDirect`. In addition, the `ComparatorOptions` now allow you to choose whether a ByteBuffer is reused over multiple comparator calls, by setting `maxReusedBufferSize > 0`. When buffers are reused, ComparatorOptions provides a choice of mutex type by setting `useAdaptiveMutex`. --- [JMH benchmarks previously indicated](https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6241#issue-356398306) that the difference between C++ and Java for implementing a comparator was ~7x slowdown in Java. With these changes, when reusing buffers and guarding access to them via mutexes the slowdown is approximately the same. However, these changes offer a new facility to not reuse mutextes, which reduces the slowdown to ~5.5x in Java. We also offer a `thread_local` mechanism for reusing buffers, which reduces slowdown to ~5.2x in Java (closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4425). These changes also form a good base for further optimisation work such as further JNI lookup caching, and JNI critical. --- These numbers were captured without jemalloc. With jemalloc, the performance improves for all tests, and the Java slowdown reduces to between 4.8x and 5.x. ``` ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_bytewise thrpt 25 124483.795 ± 2032.443 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put native_reverse_bytewise thrpt 25 114414.536 ± 3486.156 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 17228.250 ± 1288.546 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16035.865 ± 1248.099 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 21571.500 ± 871.521 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 23613.773 ± 8465.660 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 16768.172 ± 5618.489 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 23921.164 ± 8734.742 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 17899.684 ± 839.679 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 22148.316 ± 1215.527 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11311.126 ± 820.602 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 11421.311 ± 807.210 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 11554.005 ± 960.556 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 22960.523 ± 1673.421 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_non-adaptive-mutex thrpt 25 18293.317 ± 1434.601 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_reused-64_thread-local thrpt 25 24479.361 ± 2157.306 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_non-direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 7942.286 ± 626.170 ops/s ComparatorBenchmarks.put java_reverse_bytewise_direct_no-reuse thrpt 25 11781.955 ± 1019.843 ops/s ``` Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6252 Differential Revision: D19331064 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 1f3b794e6a14162b2c3ffb943e8c0e64a0c03738
2020-02-03 21:28:25 +01:00
org.rocksdb.util.ReverseBytewiseComparatorIntTest\
org.rocksdb.RocksDBTest\
org.rocksdb.RocksDBExceptionTest\
org.rocksdb.DefaultEnvTest\
org.rocksdb.RocksIteratorTest\
org.rocksdb.RocksMemEnvTest\
org.rocksdb.util.SizeUnitTest\
org.rocksdb.SecondaryDBTest\
org.rocksdb.SliceTest\
org.rocksdb.SnapshotTest\
org.rocksdb.SstFileManagerTest\
org.rocksdb.SstFileWriterTest\
org.rocksdb.SstFileReaderTest\
org.rocksdb.SstPartitionerTest\
org.rocksdb.TableFilterTest\
org.rocksdb.TimedEnvTest\
org.rocksdb.TransactionTest\
org.rocksdb.TransactionDBTest\
org.rocksdb.TransactionOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.TransactionDBOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.TransactionLogIteratorTest\
org.rocksdb.TtlDBTest\
org.rocksdb.StatisticsTest\
org.rocksdb.StatisticsCollectorTest\
org.rocksdb.WalFilterTest\
org.rocksdb.WALRecoveryModeTest\
org.rocksdb.WriteBatchHandlerTest\
org.rocksdb.WriteBatchTest\
org.rocksdb.WriteBatchThreadedTest\
org.rocksdb.WriteOptionsTest\
org.rocksdb.WriteBatchWithIndexTest
MAIN_SRC = src/main/java
TEST_SRC = src/test/java
OUTPUT = target
MAIN_CLASSES = $(OUTPUT)/classes
TEST_CLASSES = $(OUTPUT)/test-classes
JAVADOC = $(OUTPUT)/apidocs
2014-11-02 01:08:41 +01:00
BENCHMARK_MAIN_SRC = benchmark/src/main/java
BENCHMARK_OUTPUT = benchmark/target
BENCHMARK_MAIN_CLASSES = $(BENCHMARK_OUTPUT)/classes
SAMPLES_MAIN_SRC = samples/src/main/java
SAMPLES_OUTPUT = samples/target
SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES = $(SAMPLES_OUTPUT)/classes
JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR = test-libs
JAVA_JUNIT_JAR = $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR)/junit-4.12.jar
JAVA_HAMCR_JAR = $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR)/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar
JAVA_MOCKITO_JAR = $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR)/mockito-all-1.10.19.jar
JAVA_CGLIB_JAR = $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR)/cglib-2.2.2.jar
JAVA_ASSERTJ_JAR = $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR)/assertj-core-1.7.1.jar
JAVA_TESTCLASSPATH = $(JAVA_JUNIT_JAR):$(JAVA_HAMCR_JAR):$(JAVA_MOCKITO_JAR):$(JAVA_CGLIB_JAR):$(JAVA_ASSERTJ_JAR)
2014-11-02 01:08:41 +01:00
MVN_LOCAL = ~/.m2/repository
# Set the default JAVA_ARGS to "" for DEBUG_LEVEL=0
JAVA_ARGS ?=
JAVAC_ARGS ?=
# When debugging add -Xcheck:jni to the java args
ifneq ($(DEBUG_LEVEL),0)
JAVA_ARGS += -ea -Xcheck:jni
JAVAC_ARGS += -Xlint:deprecation -Xlint:unchecked
endif
# Using a Facebook AWS account for S3 storage. (maven.org has a history
# of failing in Travis builds.)
DEPS_URL?=https://rocksdb-deps.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jars
clean: clean-not-downloaded clean-downloaded
clean-not-downloaded:
$(AM_V_at)rm -rf $(NATIVE_INCLUDE)
$(AM_V_at)rm -rf $(OUTPUT)
$(AM_V_at)rm -rf $(BENCHMARK_OUTPUT)
$(AM_V_at)rm -rf $(SAMPLES_OUTPUT)
clean-downloaded:
$(AM_V_at)rm -rf $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR)
javadocs: java
$(AM_V_GEN)mkdir -p $(JAVADOC)
$(AM_V_at)javadoc -d $(JAVADOC) -sourcepath $(MAIN_SRC) -subpackages org
javalib: java java_test javadocs
java:
$(AM_V_GEN)mkdir -p $(MAIN_CLASSES)
ifeq ($(shell java -version 2>&1 | grep 1.7.0 > /dev/null; printf $$?), 0)
$(AM_V_at)javac $(JAVAC_ARGS) -d $(MAIN_CLASSES)\
$(MAIN_SRC)/org/rocksdb/util/*.java\
$(MAIN_SRC)/org/rocksdb/*.java
else
$(AM_V_at)javac $(JAVAC_ARGS) -h $(NATIVE_INCLUDE) -d $(MAIN_CLASSES)\
$(MAIN_SRC)/org/rocksdb/util/*.java\
$(MAIN_SRC)/org/rocksdb/*.java
endif
$(AM_V_at)@cp ../HISTORY.md ./HISTORY-CPP.md
$(AM_V_at)@rm -f ./HISTORY-CPP.md
ifeq ($(shell java -version 2>&1 | grep 1.7.0 > /dev/null; printf $$?), 0)
$(AM_V_at)javah -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES) -d $(NATIVE_INCLUDE) -jni $(NATIVE_JAVA_CLASSES)
endif
[JNI] Add an initial benchmark for java binding for rocksdb. Summary: * Add a benchmark for java binding for rocksdb. The java benchmark is a complete rewrite based on the c++ db/db_bench.cc and the DbBenchmark in dain's java leveldb. * Support multithreading. * 'readseq' is currently not supported as it requires RocksDB Iterator. * usage: --benchmarks Comma-separated list of operations to run in the specified order Actual benchmarks: fillseq -- write N values in sequential key order in async mode fillrandom -- write N values in random key order in async mode fillbatch -- write N/1000 batch where each batch has 1000 values in random key order in sync mode fillsync -- write N/100 values in random key order in sync mode fill100K -- write N/1000 100K values in random order in async mode readseq -- read N times sequentially readrandom -- read N times in random order readhot -- read N times in random order from 1% section of DB Meta Operations: delete -- delete DB DEFAULT: [fillseq, readrandom, fillrandom] --compression_ratio Arrange to generate values that shrink to this fraction of their original size after compression DEFAULT: 0.5 --use_existing_db If true, do not destroy the existing database. If you set this flag and also specify a benchmark that wants a fresh database, that benchmark will fail. DEFAULT: false --num Number of key/values to place in database. DEFAULT: 1000000 --threads Number of concurrent threads to run. DEFAULT: 1 --reads Number of read operations to do. If negative, do --nums reads. --key_size The size of each key in bytes. DEFAULT: 16 --value_size The size of each value in bytes. DEFAULT: 100 --write_buffer_size Number of bytes to buffer in memtable before compacting (initialized to default value by 'main'.) DEFAULT: 4194304 --cache_size Number of bytes to use as a cache of uncompressed data. Negative means use default settings. DEFAULT: -1 --seed Seed base for random number generators. DEFAULT: 0 --db Use the db with the following name. DEFAULT: /tmp/rocksdbjni-bench * Add RocksDB.write(). Test Plan: make jbench Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba, ankgup87 Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17433
2014-04-09 09:48:20 +02:00
sample: java
$(AM_V_GEN)mkdir -p $(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES)
$(AM_V_at)javac $(JAVAC_ARGS) -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES) -d $(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES) $(SAMPLES_MAIN_SRC)/RocksDBSample.java
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni_not_found
java $(JAVA_ARGS) -Djava.library.path=target -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES):$(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES) RocksDBSample /tmp/rocksdbjni
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni_not_found
column_family_sample: java
$(AM_V_GEN)mkdir -p $(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES)
$(AM_V_at)javac $(JAVAC_ARGS) -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES) -d $(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES) $(SAMPLES_MAIN_SRC)/RocksDBColumnFamilySample.java
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni
java $(JAVA_ARGS) -Djava.library.path=target -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES):$(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES) RocksDBColumnFamilySample /tmp/rocksdbjni
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni
transaction_sample: java
$(AM_V_GEN)mkdir -p $(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES)
$(AM_V_at)javac -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES) -d $(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES) $(SAMPLES_MAIN_SRC)/TransactionSample.java
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni
java -ea -Xcheck:jni -Djava.library.path=target -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES):$(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES) TransactionSample /tmp/rocksdbjni
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni
optimistic_transaction_sample: java
$(AM_V_GEN)mkdir -p $(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES)
$(AM_V_at)javac -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES) -d $(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES) $(SAMPLES_MAIN_SRC)/OptimisticTransactionSample.java
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni
java -ea -Xcheck:jni -Djava.library.path=target -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES):$(SAMPLES_MAIN_CLASSES) OptimisticTransactionSample /tmp/rocksdbjni
$(AM_V_at)@rm -rf /tmp/rocksdbjni
2014-11-02 01:08:41 +01:00
resolve_test_deps:
test -d "$(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR)" || mkdir -p "$(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR)"
test -s "$(JAVA_JUNIT_JAR)" || cp $(MVN_LOCAL)/junit/junit/4.12/junit-4.12.jar $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR) || curl --fail --insecure --output $(JAVA_JUNIT_JAR) --location $(DEPS_URL)/junit-4.12.jar
test -s "$(JAVA_HAMCR_JAR)" || cp $(MVN_LOCAL)/org/hamcrest/hamcrest-core/1.3/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR) || curl --fail --insecure --output $(JAVA_HAMCR_JAR) --location $(DEPS_URL)/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar
test -s "$(JAVA_MOCKITO_JAR)" || cp $(MVN_LOCAL)/org/mockito/mockito-all/1.10.19/mockito-all-1.10.19.jar $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR) || curl --fail --insecure --output "$(JAVA_MOCKITO_JAR)" --location $(DEPS_URL)/mockito-all-1.10.19.jar
test -s "$(JAVA_CGLIB_JAR)" || cp $(MVN_LOCAL)/cglib/cglib/2.2.2/cglib-2.2.2.jar $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR) || curl --fail --insecure --output "$(JAVA_CGLIB_JAR)" --location $(DEPS_URL)/cglib-2.2.2.jar
test -s "$(JAVA_ASSERTJ_JAR)" || cp $(MVN_LOCAL)/org/assertj/assertj-core/1.7.1/assertj-core-1.7.1.jar $(JAVA_TEST_LIBDIR) || curl --fail --insecure --output "$(JAVA_ASSERTJ_JAR)" --location $(DEPS_URL)/assertj-core-1.7.1.jar
2014-11-02 01:08:41 +01:00
java_test: java resolve_test_deps
$(AM_V_GEN)mkdir -p $(TEST_CLASSES)
ifeq ($(shell java -version 2>&1|grep 1.7.0 >/dev/null; printf $$?),0)
$(AM_V_at)javac $(JAVAC_ARGS) -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES):$(JAVA_TESTCLASSPATH) -d $(TEST_CLASSES)\
$(TEST_SRC)/org/rocksdb/test/*.java\
$(TEST_SRC)/org/rocksdb/util/*.java\
$(TEST_SRC)/org/rocksdb/*.java
$(AM_V_at)javah -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES):$(TEST_CLASSES) -d $(NATIVE_INCLUDE) -jni $(NATIVE_JAVA_TEST_CLASSES)
else
$(AM_V_at)javac $(JAVAC_ARGS) -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES):$(JAVA_TESTCLASSPATH) -h $(NATIVE_INCLUDE) -d $(TEST_CLASSES)\
$(TEST_SRC)/org/rocksdb/test/*.java\
$(TEST_SRC)/org/rocksdb/util/*.java\
$(TEST_SRC)/org/rocksdb/*.java
endif
test: java java_test run_test
run_test:
java $(JAVA_ARGS) -Djava.library.path=target -cp "$(MAIN_CLASSES):$(TEST_CLASSES):$(JAVA_TESTCLASSPATH):target/*" org.rocksdb.test.RocksJunitRunner $(JAVA_TESTS)
[JNI] Add an initial benchmark for java binding for rocksdb. Summary: * Add a benchmark for java binding for rocksdb. The java benchmark is a complete rewrite based on the c++ db/db_bench.cc and the DbBenchmark in dain's java leveldb. * Support multithreading. * 'readseq' is currently not supported as it requires RocksDB Iterator. * usage: --benchmarks Comma-separated list of operations to run in the specified order Actual benchmarks: fillseq -- write N values in sequential key order in async mode fillrandom -- write N values in random key order in async mode fillbatch -- write N/1000 batch where each batch has 1000 values in random key order in sync mode fillsync -- write N/100 values in random key order in sync mode fill100K -- write N/1000 100K values in random order in async mode readseq -- read N times sequentially readrandom -- read N times in random order readhot -- read N times in random order from 1% section of DB Meta Operations: delete -- delete DB DEFAULT: [fillseq, readrandom, fillrandom] --compression_ratio Arrange to generate values that shrink to this fraction of their original size after compression DEFAULT: 0.5 --use_existing_db If true, do not destroy the existing database. If you set this flag and also specify a benchmark that wants a fresh database, that benchmark will fail. DEFAULT: false --num Number of key/values to place in database. DEFAULT: 1000000 --threads Number of concurrent threads to run. DEFAULT: 1 --reads Number of read operations to do. If negative, do --nums reads. --key_size The size of each key in bytes. DEFAULT: 16 --value_size The size of each value in bytes. DEFAULT: 100 --write_buffer_size Number of bytes to buffer in memtable before compacting (initialized to default value by 'main'.) DEFAULT: 4194304 --cache_size Number of bytes to use as a cache of uncompressed data. Negative means use default settings. DEFAULT: -1 --seed Seed base for random number generators. DEFAULT: 0 --db Use the db with the following name. DEFAULT: /tmp/rocksdbjni-bench * Add RocksDB.write(). Test Plan: make jbench Reviewers: haobo, sdong, dhruba, ankgup87 Reviewed By: haobo CC: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17433
2014-04-09 09:48:20 +02:00
db_bench: java
$(AM_V_GEN)mkdir -p $(BENCHMARK_MAIN_CLASSES)
$(AM_V_at)javac $(JAVAC_ARGS) -cp $(MAIN_CLASSES) -d $(BENCHMARK_MAIN_CLASSES) $(BENCHMARK_MAIN_SRC)/org/rocksdb/benchmark/*.java