2016-02-10 00:12:00 +01:00
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
2017-07-16 01:03:42 +02:00
|
|
|
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
|
|
|
|
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
|
|
|
|
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
|
2013-10-16 23:59:46 +02:00
|
|
|
//
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
|
|
|
// found in the LICENSE file. See the AUTHORS file for names of contributors.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-05 07:32:05 +02:00
|
|
|
#pragma once
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <atomic>
|
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences.
Summary:
Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded
to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking
up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or
Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then
applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the
base/sentinel value.
I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to
take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters).
The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves
together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if
and only if the "associative-merge" fails.
This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general
case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain
efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure.
NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review,
revision, and testing. Feedback welcome!
Test Plan:
-This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it.
-I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests
(counters, string-append, and redis-lists)
-I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb.
-I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using
db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress.
-I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable,
Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0,
Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found,
end-of-history, end-of-file, etc.
-A lot of feedback from the reviewers.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
2013-08-06 05:14:32 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <deque>
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <functional>
|
|
|
|
#include <memory>
|
|
|
|
#include <string>
|
2016-11-14 03:58:17 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <unordered_map>
|
2014-09-11 03:46:09 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <vector>
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "db/dbformat.h"
|
2016-11-04 02:40:23 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "db/range_del_aggregator.h"
|
2014-01-24 23:30:28 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "db/version_edit.h"
|
2017-04-06 04:02:00 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "monitoring/instrumented_mutex.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "options/cf_options.h"
|
2013-08-23 17:38:13 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "rocksdb/db.h"
|
2015-03-03 19:59:36 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "rocksdb/env.h"
|
2013-08-23 17:38:13 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "rocksdb/memtablerep.h"
|
2017-06-02 23:13:59 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "util/allocator.h"
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "util/concurrent_arena.h"
|
2013-11-27 23:27:02 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "util/dynamic_bloom.h"
|
2016-11-14 03:58:17 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "util/hash.h"
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-04 06:49:15 +02:00
|
|
|
namespace rocksdb {
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Mutex;
|
|
|
|
class MemTableIterator;
|
2013-12-03 03:34:05 +01:00
|
|
|
class MergeContext;
|
2015-10-13 00:06:38 +02:00
|
|
|
class InternalIterator;
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-09 03:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
struct MemTableOptions {
|
2014-09-17 21:49:13 +02:00
|
|
|
explicit MemTableOptions(
|
2014-10-27 20:10:13 +01:00
|
|
|
const ImmutableCFOptions& ioptions,
|
|
|
|
const MutableCFOptions& mutable_cf_options);
|
2014-09-09 03:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
size_t write_buffer_size;
|
|
|
|
size_t arena_block_size;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t memtable_prefix_bloom_bits;
|
2016-07-27 03:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
size_t memtable_huge_page_size;
|
2014-09-09 03:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
bool inplace_update_support;
|
|
|
|
size_t inplace_update_num_locks;
|
|
|
|
UpdateStatus (*inplace_callback)(char* existing_value,
|
|
|
|
uint32_t* existing_value_size,
|
|
|
|
Slice delta_value,
|
|
|
|
std::string* merged_value);
|
|
|
|
size_t max_successive_merges;
|
2014-10-27 20:10:13 +01:00
|
|
|
Statistics* statistics;
|
|
|
|
MergeOperator* merge_operator;
|
|
|
|
Logger* info_log;
|
2014-09-09 03:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-07 23:45:29 +02:00
|
|
|
// Batched counters to updated when inserting keys in one write batch.
|
|
|
|
// In post process of the write batch, these can be updated together.
|
|
|
|
// Only used in concurrent memtable insert case.
|
|
|
|
struct MemTablePostProcessInfo {
|
|
|
|
uint64_t data_size = 0;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t num_entries = 0;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t num_deletes = 0;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// Note: Many of the methods in this class have comments indicating that
|
|
|
|
// external synchromization is required as these methods are not thread-safe.
|
|
|
|
// It is up to higher layers of code to decide how to prevent concurrent
|
|
|
|
// invokation of these methods. This is usually done by acquiring either
|
|
|
|
// the db mutex or the single writer thread.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Some of these methods are documented to only require external
|
|
|
|
// synchronization if this memtable is immutable. Calling MarkImmutable() is
|
|
|
|
// not sufficient to guarantee immutability. It is up to higher layers of
|
|
|
|
// code to determine if this MemTable can still be modified by other threads.
|
|
|
|
// Eg: The Superversion stores a pointer to the current MemTable (that can
|
|
|
|
// be modified) and a separate list of the MemTables that can no longer be
|
|
|
|
// written to (aka the 'immutable memtables').
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
class MemTable {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
2013-07-23 23:42:27 +02:00
|
|
|
struct KeyComparator : public MemTableRep::KeyComparator {
|
|
|
|
const InternalKeyComparator comparator;
|
|
|
|
explicit KeyComparator(const InternalKeyComparator& c) : comparator(c) { }
|
2014-01-25 02:50:59 +01:00
|
|
|
virtual int operator()(const char* prefix_len_key1,
|
2015-02-26 20:28:41 +01:00
|
|
|
const char* prefix_len_key2) const override;
|
2014-01-25 02:50:59 +01:00
|
|
|
virtual int operator()(const char* prefix_len_key,
|
|
|
|
const Slice& key) const override;
|
2013-07-23 23:42:27 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-21 04:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
// MemTables are reference counted. The initial reference count
|
|
|
|
// is zero and the caller must call Ref() at least once.
|
2015-05-29 23:36:35 +02:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// earliest_seq should be the current SequenceNumber in the db such that any
|
|
|
|
// key inserted into this memtable will have an equal or larger seq number.
|
|
|
|
// (When a db is first created, the earliest sequence number will be 0).
|
|
|
|
// If the earliest sequence number is not known, kMaxSequenceNumber may be
|
|
|
|
// used, but this may prevent some transactions from succeeding until the
|
|
|
|
// first key is inserted into the memtable.
|
2014-01-15 00:27:09 +01:00
|
|
|
explicit MemTable(const InternalKeyComparator& comparator,
|
2014-09-09 03:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
const ImmutableCFOptions& ioptions,
|
2014-12-02 21:09:20 +01:00
|
|
|
const MutableCFOptions& mutable_cf_options,
|
2016-06-21 03:01:03 +02:00
|
|
|
WriteBufferManager* write_buffer_manager,
|
2017-06-02 21:08:01 +02:00
|
|
|
SequenceNumber earliest_seq, uint32_t column_family_id);
|
2011-05-21 04:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// Do not delete this MemTable unless Unref() indicates it not in use.
|
2013-11-25 20:55:36 +01:00
|
|
|
~MemTable();
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-21 04:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
// Increase reference count.
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable.
|
2011-05-21 04:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
void Ref() { ++refs_; }
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-25 20:55:36 +01:00
|
|
|
// Drop reference count.
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// If the refcount goes to zero return this memtable, otherwise return null.
|
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable.
|
2013-11-25 20:55:36 +01:00
|
|
|
MemTable* Unref() {
|
2011-05-21 04:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
--refs_;
|
|
|
|
assert(refs_ >= 0);
|
|
|
|
if (refs_ <= 0) {
|
2013-11-25 20:55:36 +01:00
|
|
|
return this;
|
2011-05-21 04:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-11-25 20:55:36 +01:00
|
|
|
return nullptr;
|
2011-05-21 04:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Returns an estimate of the number of bytes of data in use by this
|
|
|
|
// data structure.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable (unless this Memtable is immutable).
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
size_t ApproximateMemoryUsage();
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-13 00:40:14 +01:00
|
|
|
// This method heuristically determines if the memtable should continue to
|
|
|
|
// host more data.
|
2014-09-11 03:46:09 +02:00
|
|
|
bool ShouldScheduleFlush() const {
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return flush_state_.load(std::memory_order_relaxed) == FLUSH_REQUESTED;
|
2014-09-11 03:46:09 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
// Returns true if a flush should be scheduled and the caller should
|
|
|
|
// be the one to schedule it
|
|
|
|
bool MarkFlushScheduled() {
|
|
|
|
auto before = FLUSH_REQUESTED;
|
|
|
|
return flush_state_.compare_exchange_strong(before, FLUSH_SCHEDULED,
|
|
|
|
std::memory_order_relaxed,
|
|
|
|
std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-03-13 00:40:14 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
// Return an iterator that yields the contents of the memtable.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// The caller must ensure that the underlying MemTable remains live
|
|
|
|
// while the returned iterator is live. The keys returned by this
|
|
|
|
// iterator are internal keys encoded by AppendInternalKey in the
|
2013-01-04 02:13:56 +01:00
|
|
|
// db/dbformat.{h,cc} module.
|
2013-08-23 08:10:02 +02:00
|
|
|
//
|
2014-04-25 21:21:34 +02:00
|
|
|
// By default, it returns an iterator for prefix seek if prefix_extractor
|
|
|
|
// is configured in Options.
|
In DB::NewIterator(), try to allocate the whole iterator tree in an arena
Summary:
In this patch, try to allocate the whole iterator tree starting from DBIter from an arena
1. ArenaWrappedDBIter is created when serves as the entry point of an iterator tree, with an arena in it.
2. Add an option to create iterator from arena for following iterators: DBIter, MergingIterator, MemtableIterator, all mem table's iterators, all table reader's iterators and two level iterator.
3. MergeIteratorBuilder is created to incrementally build the tree of internal iterators. It is passed to mem table list and version set and add iterators to it.
Limitations:
(1) Only DB::NewIterator() without tailing uses the arena. Other cases, including readonly DB and compactions are still from malloc
(2) Two level iterator itself is allocated in arena, but not iterators inside it.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: ljin, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, yhchiang, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18513
2014-06-03 01:38:00 +02:00
|
|
|
// arena: If not null, the arena needs to be used to allocate the Iterator.
|
|
|
|
// Calling ~Iterator of the iterator will destroy all the states but
|
|
|
|
// those allocated in arena.
|
2015-10-13 00:06:38 +02:00
|
|
|
InternalIterator* NewIterator(const ReadOptions& read_options, Arena* arena);
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-19 23:14:35 +01:00
|
|
|
InternalIterator* NewRangeTombstoneIterator(const ReadOptions& read_options);
|
2016-09-12 23:14:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
// Add an entry into memtable that maps key to value at the
|
|
|
|
// specified sequence number and with the specified type.
|
|
|
|
// Typically value will be empty if type==kTypeDeletion.
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
//
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: if allow_concurrent = false, external synchronization to prevent
|
|
|
|
// simultaneous operations on the same MemTable.
|
|
|
|
void Add(SequenceNumber seq, ValueType type, const Slice& key,
|
2016-07-07 23:45:29 +02:00
|
|
|
const Slice& value, bool allow_concurrent = false,
|
|
|
|
MemTablePostProcessInfo* post_process_info = nullptr);
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-22 04:36:45 +02:00
|
|
|
// If memtable contains a value for key, store it in *value and return true.
|
|
|
|
// If memtable contains a deletion for key, store a NotFound() error
|
|
|
|
// in *status and return true.
|
2013-03-21 23:59:47 +01:00
|
|
|
// If memtable contains Merge operation as the most recent entry for a key,
|
2013-07-26 21:57:01 +02:00
|
|
|
// and the merge process does not stop (not reaching a value or delete),
|
[RocksDB] [MergeOperator] The new Merge Interface! Uses merge sequences.
Summary:
Here are the major changes to the Merge Interface. It has been expanded
to handle cases where the MergeOperator is not associative. It does so by stacking
up merge operations while scanning through the key history (i.e.: during Get() or
Compaction), until a valid Put/Delete/end-of-history is encountered; it then
applies all of the merge operations in the correct sequence starting with the
base/sentinel value.
I have also introduced an "AssociativeMerge" function which allows the user to
take advantage of associative merge operations (such as in the case of counters).
The implementation will always attempt to merge the operations/operands themselves
together when they are encountered, and will resort to the "stacking" method if
and only if the "associative-merge" fails.
This implementation is conjectured to allow MergeOperator to handle the general
case, while still providing the user with the ability to take advantage of certain
efficiencies in their own merge-operator / data-structure.
NOTE: This is a preliminary diff. This must still go through a lot of review,
revision, and testing. Feedback welcome!
Test Plan:
-This is a preliminary diff. I have only just begun testing/debugging it.
-I will be testing this with the existing MergeOperator use-cases and unit-tests
(counters, string-append, and redis-lists)
-I will be "desk-checking" and walking through the code with the help gdb.
-I will find a way of stress-testing the new interface / implementation using
db_bench, db_test, merge_test, and/or db_stress.
-I will ensure that my tests cover all cases: Get-Memtable,
Get-Immutable-Memtable, Get-from-Disk, Iterator-Range-Scan, Flush-Memtable-to-L0,
Compaction-L0-L1, Compaction-Ln-L(n+1), Put/Delete found, Put/Delete not-found,
end-of-history, end-of-file, etc.
-A lot of feedback from the reviewers.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, zshao, emayanke
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D11499
2013-08-06 05:14:32 +02:00
|
|
|
// prepend the current merge operand to *operands.
|
|
|
|
// store MergeInProgress in s, and return false.
|
2011-06-22 04:36:45 +02:00
|
|
|
// Else, return false.
|
2015-05-29 23:36:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// If any operation was found, its most recent sequence number
|
|
|
|
// will be stored in *seq on success (regardless of whether true/false is
|
|
|
|
// returned). Otherwise, *seq will be set to kMaxSequenceNumber.
|
|
|
|
// On success, *s may be set to OK, NotFound, or MergeInProgress. Any other
|
|
|
|
// status returned indicates a corruption or other unexpected error.
|
2017-01-08 22:49:15 +01:00
|
|
|
bool Get(const LookupKey& key, std::string* value, Status* s,
|
|
|
|
MergeContext* merge_context, RangeDelAggregator* range_del_agg,
|
2017-10-03 18:08:07 +02:00
|
|
|
SequenceNumber* seq, const ReadOptions& read_opts,
|
|
|
|
bool* is_blob_index = nullptr);
|
2017-01-08 23:08:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-08 22:49:15 +01:00
|
|
|
bool Get(const LookupKey& key, std::string* value, Status* s,
|
|
|
|
MergeContext* merge_context, RangeDelAggregator* range_del_agg,
|
2017-10-03 18:08:07 +02:00
|
|
|
const ReadOptions& read_opts, bool* is_blob_index = nullptr) {
|
2017-01-08 23:08:51 +01:00
|
|
|
SequenceNumber seq;
|
2017-10-03 18:08:07 +02:00
|
|
|
return Get(key, value, s, merge_context, range_del_agg, &seq, read_opts,
|
|
|
|
is_blob_index);
|
2017-01-08 23:08:51 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-01-08 22:49:15 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-14 16:55:16 +01:00
|
|
|
// Attempts to update the new_value inplace, else does normal Add
|
|
|
|
// Pseudocode
|
|
|
|
// if key exists in current memtable && prev_value is of type kTypeValue
|
|
|
|
// if new sizeof(new_value) <= sizeof(prev_value)
|
|
|
|
// update inplace
|
|
|
|
// else add(key, new_value)
|
|
|
|
// else add(key, new_value)
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable.
|
2014-01-14 16:55:16 +01:00
|
|
|
void Update(SequenceNumber seq,
|
In-place updates for equal keys and similar sized values
Summary:
Currently for each put, a fresh memory is allocated, and a new entry is added to the memtable with a new sequence number irrespective of whether the key already exists in the memtable. This diff is an attempt to update the value inplace for existing keys. It currently handles a very simple case:
1. Key already exists in the current memtable. Does not inplace update values in immutable memtable or snapshot
2. Latest value type is a 'put' ie kTypeValue
3. New value size is less than existing value, to avoid reallocating memory
TODO: For a put of an existing key, deallocate memory take by values, for other value types till a kTypeValue is found, ie. remove kTypeMerge.
TODO: Update the transaction log, to allow consistent reload of the memtable.
Test Plan: Added a unit test verifying the inplace update. But some other unit tests broken due to invalid sequence number checks. WIll fix them next.
Reviewers: xinyaohu, sumeet, haobo, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12423
Automatic commit by arc
2013-08-19 23:12:47 +02:00
|
|
|
const Slice& key,
|
|
|
|
const Slice& value);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-15 16:47:47 +01:00
|
|
|
// If prev_value for key exists, attempts to update it inplace.
|
2014-01-14 16:55:16 +01:00
|
|
|
// else returns false
|
|
|
|
// Pseudocode
|
|
|
|
// if key exists in current memtable && prev_value is of type kTypeValue
|
|
|
|
// new_value = delta(prev_value)
|
|
|
|
// if sizeof(new_value) <= sizeof(prev_value)
|
|
|
|
// update inplace
|
|
|
|
// else add(key, new_value)
|
|
|
|
// else return false
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable.
|
2014-01-14 16:55:16 +01:00
|
|
|
bool UpdateCallback(SequenceNumber seq,
|
|
|
|
const Slice& key,
|
2014-09-09 03:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
const Slice& delta);
|
2014-01-14 16:55:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-11 02:33:56 +01:00
|
|
|
// Returns the number of successive merge entries starting from the newest
|
|
|
|
// entry for the key up to the last non-merge entry or last entry for the
|
|
|
|
// key in the memtable.
|
|
|
|
size_t CountSuccessiveMergeEntries(const LookupKey& key);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-07 23:45:29 +02:00
|
|
|
// Update counters and flush status after inserting a whole write batch
|
|
|
|
// Used in concurrent memtable inserts.
|
|
|
|
void BatchPostProcess(const MemTablePostProcessInfo& update_counters) {
|
|
|
|
num_entries_.fetch_add(update_counters.num_entries,
|
|
|
|
std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
|
|
|
data_size_.fetch_add(update_counters.data_size, std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
2016-07-08 21:51:24 +02:00
|
|
|
if (update_counters.num_deletes != 0) {
|
|
|
|
num_deletes_.fetch_add(update_counters.num_deletes,
|
|
|
|
std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-07 23:45:29 +02:00
|
|
|
UpdateFlushState();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-23 02:17:33 +02:00
|
|
|
// Get total number of entries in the mem table.
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable (unless this Memtable is immutable).
|
2015-06-13 03:04:30 +02:00
|
|
|
uint64_t num_entries() const {
|
|
|
|
return num_entries_.load(std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-03-19 00:11:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// Get total number of deletes in the mem table.
|
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable (unless this Memtable is immutable).
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
uint64_t num_deletes() const {
|
|
|
|
return num_deletes_.load(std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-04-23 02:17:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-19 23:00:53 +02:00
|
|
|
// Returns the edits area that is needed for flushing the memtable
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit* GetEdits() { return &edit_; }
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-05 21:01:01 +02:00
|
|
|
// Returns if there is no entry inserted to the mem table.
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable (unless this Memtable is immutable).
|
2014-09-05 21:01:01 +02:00
|
|
|
bool IsEmpty() const { return first_seqno_ == 0; }
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-28 23:09:30 +01:00
|
|
|
// Returns the sequence number of the first element that was inserted
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// into the memtable.
|
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable (unless this Memtable is immutable).
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
SequenceNumber GetFirstSequenceNumber() {
|
|
|
|
return first_seqno_.load(std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-02-28 23:09:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-29 23:36:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// Returns the sequence number that is guaranteed to be smaller than or equal
|
|
|
|
// to the sequence number of any key that could be inserted into this
|
|
|
|
// memtable. It can then be assumed that any write with a larger(or equal)
|
|
|
|
// sequence number will be present in this memtable or a later memtable.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// If the earliest sequence number could not be determined,
|
|
|
|
// kMaxSequenceNumber will be returned.
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
SequenceNumber GetEarliestSequenceNumber() {
|
|
|
|
return earliest_seqno_.load(std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-29 23:36:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-21 18:59:57 +01:00
|
|
|
// DB's latest sequence ID when the memtable is created. This number
|
|
|
|
// may be updated to a more recent one before any key is inserted.
|
|
|
|
SequenceNumber GetCreationSeq() const { return creation_seq_; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void SetCreationSeq(SequenceNumber sn) { creation_seq_ = sn; }
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-16 20:56:46 +02:00
|
|
|
// Returns the next active logfile number when this memtable is about to
|
|
|
|
// be flushed to storage
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable.
|
2013-07-16 20:56:46 +02:00
|
|
|
uint64_t GetNextLogNumber() { return mem_next_logfile_number_; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Sets the next active logfile number when this memtable is about to
|
|
|
|
// be flushed to storage
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable.
|
2013-07-16 20:56:46 +02:00
|
|
|
void SetNextLogNumber(uint64_t num) { mem_next_logfile_number_ = num; }
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-18 20:11:51 +02:00
|
|
|
// if this memtable contains data from a committed
|
|
|
|
// two phase transaction we must take note of the
|
|
|
|
// log which contains that data so we can know
|
|
|
|
// when to relese that log
|
|
|
|
void RefLogContainingPrepSection(uint64_t log);
|
|
|
|
uint64_t GetMinLogContainingPrepSection();
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-09 06:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// Notify the underlying storage that no more items will be added.
|
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: external synchronization to prevent simultaneous
|
|
|
|
// operations on the same MemTable.
|
|
|
|
// After MarkImmutable() is called, you should not attempt to
|
|
|
|
// write anything to this MemTable(). (Ie. do not call Add() or Update()).
|
2014-12-02 21:09:20 +01:00
|
|
|
void MarkImmutable() {
|
|
|
|
table_->MarkReadOnly();
|
2017-06-02 23:13:59 +02:00
|
|
|
mem_tracker_.DoneAllocating();
|
2014-12-02 21:09:20 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-08-23 08:10:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Add a new mem-table representation based on cuckoo hash.
Summary:
= Major Changes =
* Add a new mem-table representation, HashCuckooRep, which is based cuckoo hash.
Cuckoo hash uses multiple hash functions. This allows each key to have multiple
possible locations in the mem-table.
- Put: When insert a key, it will try to find whether one of its possible
locations is vacant and store the key. If none of its possible
locations are available, then it will kick out a victim key and
store at that location. The kicked-out victim key will then be
stored at a vacant space of its possible locations or kick-out
another victim. In this diff, the kick-out path (known as
cuckoo-path) is found using BFS, which guarantees to be the shortest.
- Get: Simply tries all possible locations of a key --- this guarantees
worst-case constant time complexity.
- Time complexity: O(1) for Get, and average O(1) for Put if the
fullness of the mem-table is below 80%.
- Default using two hash functions, the number of hash functions used
by the cuckoo-hash may dynamically increase if it fails to find a
short-enough kick-out path.
- Currently, HashCuckooRep does not support iteration and snapshots,
as our current main purpose of this is to optimize point access.
= Minor Changes =
* Add IsSnapshotSupported() to DB to indicate whether the current DB
supports snapshots. If it returns false, then DB::GetSnapshot() will
always return nullptr.
Test Plan:
Run existing tests. Will develop a test specifically for cuckoo hash in
the next diff.
Reviewers: sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, dhruba, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16155
2014-04-30 02:13:46 +02:00
|
|
|
// return true if the current MemTableRep supports merge operator.
|
|
|
|
bool IsMergeOperatorSupported() const {
|
|
|
|
return table_->IsMergeOperatorSupported();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// return true if the current MemTableRep supports snapshots.
|
2015-02-03 21:19:56 +01:00
|
|
|
// inplace update prevents snapshots,
|
|
|
|
bool IsSnapshotSupported() const {
|
|
|
|
return table_->IsSnapshotSupported() && !moptions_.inplace_update_support;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Add a new mem-table representation based on cuckoo hash.
Summary:
= Major Changes =
* Add a new mem-table representation, HashCuckooRep, which is based cuckoo hash.
Cuckoo hash uses multiple hash functions. This allows each key to have multiple
possible locations in the mem-table.
- Put: When insert a key, it will try to find whether one of its possible
locations is vacant and store the key. If none of its possible
locations are available, then it will kick out a victim key and
store at that location. The kicked-out victim key will then be
stored at a vacant space of its possible locations or kick-out
another victim. In this diff, the kick-out path (known as
cuckoo-path) is found using BFS, which guarantees to be the shortest.
- Get: Simply tries all possible locations of a key --- this guarantees
worst-case constant time complexity.
- Time complexity: O(1) for Get, and average O(1) for Put if the
fullness of the mem-table is below 80%.
- Default using two hash functions, the number of hash functions used
by the cuckoo-hash may dynamically increase if it fails to find a
short-enough kick-out path.
- Currently, HashCuckooRep does not support iteration and snapshots,
as our current main purpose of this is to optimize point access.
= Minor Changes =
* Add IsSnapshotSupported() to DB to indicate whether the current DB
supports snapshots. If it returns false, then DB::GetSnapshot() will
always return nullptr.
Test Plan:
Run existing tests. Will develop a test specifically for cuckoo hash in
the next diff.
Reviewers: sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb, dhruba, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16155
2014-04-30 02:13:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-06 23:42:38 +01:00
|
|
|
struct MemTableStats {
|
|
|
|
uint64_t size;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t count;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MemTableStats ApproximateStats(const Slice& start_ikey,
|
|
|
|
const Slice& end_ikey);
|
2015-06-13 03:04:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-02-11 18:46:30 +01:00
|
|
|
// Get the lock associated for the key
|
|
|
|
port::RWMutex* GetLock(const Slice& key);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const InternalKeyComparator& GetInternalKeyComparator() const {
|
|
|
|
return comparator_.comparator;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-09 03:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
const MemTableOptions* GetMemTableOptions() const { return &moptions_; }
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-24 00:22:05 +02:00
|
|
|
uint64_t ApproximateOldestKeyTime() const {
|
|
|
|
return oldest_key_time_.load(std::memory_order_relaxed);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
private:
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
enum FlushStateEnum { FLUSH_NOT_REQUESTED, FLUSH_REQUESTED, FLUSH_SCHEDULED };
|
2014-03-13 00:40:14 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
friend class MemTableIterator;
|
|
|
|
friend class MemTableBackwardIterator;
|
2012-10-19 23:00:53 +02:00
|
|
|
friend class MemTableList;
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeyComparator comparator_;
|
2014-09-09 03:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
const MemTableOptions moptions_;
|
2011-05-21 04:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
int refs_;
|
2014-03-13 00:40:14 +01:00
|
|
|
const size_t kArenaBlockSize;
|
2017-06-02 23:13:59 +02:00
|
|
|
AllocTracker mem_tracker_;
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
ConcurrentArena arena_;
|
2014-01-16 03:17:58 +01:00
|
|
|
unique_ptr<MemTableRep> table_;
|
2016-09-12 23:14:40 +02:00
|
|
|
unique_ptr<MemTableRep> range_del_table_;
|
2016-11-21 21:07:09 +01:00
|
|
|
bool is_range_del_table_empty_;
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-13 03:04:30 +02:00
|
|
|
// Total data size of all data inserted
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<uint64_t> data_size_;
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<uint64_t> num_entries_;
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
std::atomic<uint64_t> num_deletes_;
|
2014-04-23 02:17:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-19 23:00:53 +02:00
|
|
|
// These are used to manage memtable flushes to storage
|
2012-11-29 01:42:36 +01:00
|
|
|
bool flush_in_progress_; // started the flush
|
2012-10-19 23:00:53 +02:00
|
|
|
bool flush_completed_; // finished the flush
|
|
|
|
uint64_t file_number_; // filled up after flush is complete
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-14 16:55:16 +01:00
|
|
|
// The updates to be applied to the transaction log when this
|
2012-10-19 23:00:53 +02:00
|
|
|
// memtable is flushed to storage.
|
|
|
|
VersionEdit edit_;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-28 23:09:30 +01:00
|
|
|
// The sequence number of the kv that was inserted first
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
std::atomic<SequenceNumber> first_seqno_;
|
2013-02-28 23:09:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-29 23:36:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// The db sequence number at the time of creation or kMaxSequenceNumber
|
|
|
|
// if not set.
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
std::atomic<SequenceNumber> earliest_seqno_;
|
2015-05-29 23:36:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-21 18:59:57 +01:00
|
|
|
SequenceNumber creation_seq_;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-11 23:23:58 +02:00
|
|
|
// The log files earlier than this number can be deleted.
|
2013-07-16 20:56:46 +02:00
|
|
|
uint64_t mem_next_logfile_number_;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-18 20:11:51 +02:00
|
|
|
// the earliest log containing a prepared section
|
|
|
|
// which has been inserted into this memtable.
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<uint64_t> min_prep_log_referenced_;
|
|
|
|
|
In-place updates for equal keys and similar sized values
Summary:
Currently for each put, a fresh memory is allocated, and a new entry is added to the memtable with a new sequence number irrespective of whether the key already exists in the memtable. This diff is an attempt to update the value inplace for existing keys. It currently handles a very simple case:
1. Key already exists in the current memtable. Does not inplace update values in immutable memtable or snapshot
2. Latest value type is a 'put' ie kTypeValue
3. New value size is less than existing value, to avoid reallocating memory
TODO: For a put of an existing key, deallocate memory take by values, for other value types till a kTypeValue is found, ie. remove kTypeMerge.
TODO: Update the transaction log, to allow consistent reload of the memtable.
Test Plan: Added a unit test verifying the inplace update. But some other unit tests broken due to invalid sequence number checks. WIll fix them next.
Reviewers: xinyaohu, sumeet, haobo, dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12423
Automatic commit by arc
2013-08-19 23:12:47 +02:00
|
|
|
// rw locks for inplace updates
|
|
|
|
std::vector<port::RWMutex> locks_;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-27 23:27:02 +01:00
|
|
|
const SliceTransform* const prefix_extractor_;
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<DynamicBloom> prefix_bloom_;
|
2014-03-13 00:40:14 +01:00
|
|
|
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
std::atomic<FlushStateEnum> flush_state_;
|
2014-09-11 03:46:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-03 19:59:36 +01:00
|
|
|
Env* env_;
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-14 03:58:17 +01:00
|
|
|
// Extract sequential insert prefixes.
|
|
|
|
const SliceTransform* insert_with_hint_prefix_extractor_;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Insert hints for each prefix.
|
|
|
|
std::unordered_map<Slice, void*, SliceHasher> insert_hints_;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-24 00:22:05 +02:00
|
|
|
// Timestamp of oldest key
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<uint64_t> oldest_key_time_;
|
|
|
|
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
// Returns a heuristic flush decision
|
|
|
|
bool ShouldFlushNow() const;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Updates flush_state_ using ShouldFlushNow()
|
|
|
|
void UpdateFlushState();
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-24 00:22:05 +02:00
|
|
|
void UpdateOldestKeyTime();
|
|
|
|
|
support for concurrent adds to memtable
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
2015-08-15 01:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
// No copying allowed
|
|
|
|
MemTable(const MemTable&);
|
|
|
|
MemTable& operator=(const MemTable&);
|
2011-03-18 23:37:00 +01:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-21 04:49:27 +01:00
|
|
|
extern const char* EncodeKey(std::string* scratch, const Slice& target);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-04 06:49:15 +02:00
|
|
|
} // namespace rocksdb
|