Fix bug that flush doesn't respond to fsync result
Summary:
With a regression bug was introduced two years ago, by 6e9fbeb27c
, we fail to check return status of fsync call. This can cause we miss the information from the file system and can potentially cause corrupted data which we could have been detected.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2495
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D5321949
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: c68117914bb40700198fc37d0e4c63163a8a1031
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e0597951e
commit
2955407c3a
@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# Rocksdb Change Log
|
||||
## 5.4.7 (06/28/2017)
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
* Shouldn't ignore return value of fsync() in flush.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5.4.6 (05/30/2017)
|
||||
### Bug Fixes
|
||||
* Fix db_bench with lite build.
|
||||
|
@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ Status BuildTable(
|
||||
// Finish and check for file errors
|
||||
if (s.ok() && !empty) {
|
||||
StopWatch sw(env, ioptions.statistics, TABLE_SYNC_MICROS);
|
||||
file_writer->Sync(ioptions.use_fsync);
|
||||
s = file_writer->Sync(ioptions.use_fsync);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (s.ok() && !empty) {
|
||||
s = file_writer->Close();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user