Remove IOSTATS_ADD_IF_POSITIVE() (#8984)
Summary: IOSTATS_ADD_IF_POSITIVE() doesn't seem to a macro that aims to improve performance but does the opposite. The counter to add is almost always positive so the if is just a waste. Furthermore, adding to a thread local variable seemse to be much cheaper than an if condition if branch prediction has a possibility to be wrong. Remove the macro. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/8984 Test Plan: See CI completes. Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D31348163 fbshipit-source-id: 30af6d45e1aa8bbc09b2c046206cce6f67f4777a
This commit is contained in:
parent
e5bfb91d09
commit
7f08a8503f
@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ IOStatus RandomAccessFileReader::Read(const IOOptions& opts, uint64_t offset,
|
||||
}
|
||||
*result = Slice(res_scratch, io_s.ok() ? pos : 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
IOSTATS_ADD_IF_POSITIVE(bytes_read, result->size());
|
||||
IOSTATS_ADD(bytes_read, result->size());
|
||||
SetPerfLevel(prev_perf_level);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (stats_ != nullptr && file_read_hist_ != nullptr) {
|
||||
@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ IOStatus RandomAccessFileReader::MultiRead(const IOOptions& opts,
|
||||
start_ts, finish_ts, read_reqs[i].status);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif // ROCKSDB_LITE
|
||||
IOSTATS_ADD_IF_POSITIVE(bytes_read, read_reqs[i].result.size());
|
||||
IOSTATS_ADD(bytes_read, read_reqs[i].result.size());
|
||||
}
|
||||
SetPerfLevel(prev_perf_level);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -15,10 +15,6 @@ extern __thread IOStatsContext iostats_context;
|
||||
// increment a specific counter by the specified value
|
||||
#define IOSTATS_ADD(metric, value) (iostats_context.metric += value)
|
||||
|
||||
// Increase metric value only when it is positive
|
||||
#define IOSTATS_ADD_IF_POSITIVE(metric, value) \
|
||||
if (value > 0) { IOSTATS_ADD(metric, value); }
|
||||
|
||||
// reset a specific counter to zero
|
||||
#define IOSTATS_RESET(metric) (iostats_context.metric = 0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user