Summary:
In D19581 I made `ForwardIterator::status()` check all child iterators,
including immutable ones. It's, however, not necessary to do it every
time -- it'll suffice to check only when they're used and their status
could change.
This diff:
* introduces `immutable_status_` which is updated by `Seek()` and `Next()`
* removes special handling of `kIncomplete` status in those methods
Test Plan:
* `db_test`
* hacked ReadSequential in db_bench.cc to check `status()` in addition to
validity:
```
$ ./db_bench -use_existing_db -benchmarks readseq -disable_auto_compactions \
-use_tailing_iterator # without this patch
Keys: 16 bytes each
Values: 100 bytes each (50 bytes after compression)
Entries: 1000000
[...]
DB path: [/dev/shm/rocksdbtest/dbbench]
readseq : 0.562 micros/op 1778103 ops/sec; 98.4 MB/s
$ ./db_bench -use_existing_db -benchmarks readseq -disable_auto_compactions \
-use_tailing_iterator # with the patch
readseq : 0.433 micros/op 2311363 ops/sec; 127.8 MB/s
```
Reviewers: igor, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, march, lovro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24063
Summary:
This is not a critical options. Making it dynamic so that we can remove
more reference to cfd->options()
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24957
Summary:
Since ForwardIterator is on a level below DBIter, the latter may call Next() on
it (e.g. in order to skip deletion markers). Since this also updates
`prev_key_`, it may prevent the Seek() optimization.
For example, assume that there's only one SST file and it contains the following
entries: 0101, 0201 (`ValueType::kTypeDeletion`, i.e. a tombstone record), 0201
(`kTypeValue`), 0202. Memtable is empty. `Seek(0102)` will result in `prev_key_`
being set to `0201` instead of `0102`, since `DBIter::Seek()` will call
`ForwardIterator::Next()` to skip record 0201. Therefore, when `Seek(0102)` is
called again, `NeedToSeekImmutable()` will return true.
This fix relies on `prefix_extractor_` to detect prefix changes. `prev_key_` is
only set to `current_->key()` as long as they have the same prefix.
I also made a small change to `NeedToSeekImmutable()` so it no longer returns
true when the db is empty (i.e. there's nothing but a memtable).
Test Plan:
$ TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdbtest ROCKSDB_TESTS=TailingIterator ./db_test
Reviewers: sdong, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23823
Summary:
Simply code by removing code path which does not use Arena
from NewInternalIterator
Test Plan:
make all check
make valgrind_check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22395
Summary:
When reading from kBlockCacheTier, ForwardIterator's internal child iterators
may end up in the incomplete state (read was unable to complete without doing
disk I/O). `ForwardIterator::status()` will correctly report that; however, the
iterator may be stuck in that state until all sub-iterators are rebuilt:
* `NeedToSeekImmutable()` may return false even if some sub-iterators are
incomplete
* one of the child iterators may be an empty iterator without any state other
that the kIncomplete status (created using `NewErrorIterator()`); seeking on
any such iterator has no effect -- we need to construct it again
Akin to rebuilding iterators after a superversion bump, this diff makes forward
iterator reset all incomplete child iterators when `Seek()` or `Next()` are
called.
Test Plan: TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm/rocksdbtest ROCKSDB_TESTS=TailingIterator ./db_test
Reviewers: igor, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: lovro, march, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22575
Summary:
Forward iterator puts everything together in a flat structure instead of
a hierarchy of nested iterators. this should simplify the code and
provide better performance. It also enables more optimization since all
information are accessiable in one place.
Init evaluation shows about 6% improvement
Test Plan: db_test and db_bench
Reviewers: dhruba, igor, tnovak, sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
Subscribers: sdong, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18795
