Summary:
There still are many warnings (most of them about invalid printf format
for long long), but it builds if FAIL_ON_WARNINGS is disabled.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2052
Differential Revision: D4807355
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: ef03786
Summary:
This diff adds support for concurrent adds to the skiplist memtable
implementations. Memory allocation is made thread-safe by the addition of
a spinlock, with small per-core buffers to avoid contention. Concurrent
memtable writes are made via an additional method and don't impose a
performance overhead on the non-concurrent case, so parallelism can be
selected on a per-batch basis.
Write thread synchronization is an increasing bottleneck for higher levels
of concurrency, so this diff adds --enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield
(default off). This feature causes threads joining a write batch
group to spin for a short time (default 100 usec) using sched_yield,
rather than going to sleep on a mutex. If the timing of the yield calls
indicates that another thread has actually run during the yield then
spinning is avoided. This option improves performance for concurrent
situations even without parallel adds, although it has the potential to
increase CPU usage (and the heuristic adaptation is not yet mature).
Parallel writes are not currently compatible with
inplace updates, update callbacks, or delete filtering.
Enable it with --allow_concurrent_memtable_write (and
--enable_write_thread_adaptive_yield). Parallel memtable writes
are performance neutral when there is no actual parallelism, and in
my experiments (SSD server-class Linux and varying contention and key
sizes for fillrandom) they are always a performance win when there is
more than one thread.
Statistics are updated earlier in the write path, dropping the number
of DB mutex acquisitions from 2 to 1 for almost all cases.
This diff was motivated and inspired by Yahoo's cLSM work. It is more
conservative than cLSM: RocksDB's write batch group leader role is
preserved (along with all of the existing flush and write throttling
logic) and concurrent writers are blocked until all memtable insertions
have completed and the sequence number has been advanced, to preserve
linearizability.
My test config is "db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -threads=$T
-batch_size=1 -memtablerep=skip_list -value_size=100 --num=1000000/$T
-level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=9999 -level0_stop_writes_trigger=9999
-disable_auto_compactions --max_write_buffer_number=8
-max_background_flushes=8 --disable_wal --write_buffer_size=160000000
--block_size=16384 --allow_concurrent_memtable_write" on a two-socket
Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.2Ghz with lots of memory and an SSD hard drive. With 1
thread I get ~440Kops/sec. Peak performance for 1 socket (numactl
-N1) is slightly more than 1Mops/sec, at 16 threads. Peak performance
across both sockets happens at 30 threads, and is ~900Kops/sec, although
with fewer threads there is less performance loss when the system has
background work.
Test Plan:
1. concurrent stress tests for InlineSkipList and DynamicBloom
2. make clean; make check
3. make clean; DISABLE_JEMALLOC=1 make valgrind_check; valgrind db_bench
4. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_TSAN=1 make all check; db_bench
5. make clean; COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make all check; db_bench
6. make clean; OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make check
7. verify no perf regressions when disabled
Reviewers: igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: MarkCallaghan, IslamAbdelRahman, anthony, yhchiang, rven, sdong, guyg8, kradhakrishnan, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50589
Summary: We should never set max_open_files to be bigger than the system's ulimit. Otherwise we will get "Too many open files" errors. See an example in this Travis run: https://travis-ci.org/facebook/rocksdb/jobs/79591566
Test Plan:
make check
I will also verify that max_max_open_files is reasonable.
Reviewers: anthony, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46551
Previous change for the function
555ca3e7b7 (diff-bdc04e0404c2db4fd3ac5118a63eaa4a)
made use of the QueryPerformanceCounter to return microseconds values that do not repeat
as std::chrono::system_clock returned values that made auto_roll_logger_test fail.
The interface documentation does not state that we need to return
system time describing the return value as a number of microsecs since some
moment in time. However, because on Linux it is implemented using gettimeofday
various pieces of code (such as GenericRateLimiter) took advantage of that
and make use of NowMicros() as a system timestamp. Thus the previous change
broke rate_limiter_test on Windows.
In addition, the interface name NowMicros() suggests that it is actually
a timestamp so people use it as such.
This change makes use of the new system call on Windows that returns
system time with required precision. This change preserves the fix
for auto_roll_logger_test and fixes rate_limiter_test.
Note that DBTest.RateLimitingTest still fails due to a separately reported issue.
Summary: This helps Windows port to format their changes, as discussed. Might have formatted some other codes too becasue last 10 commits include more.
Test Plan: Build it.
Reviewers: anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41961
1) Crash in env_win.cc that prevented db_test run to completion and some new tests
2) Fix new corruption tests in DBTest by allowing a shared trunction of files. Note that this is generally needed ONLY for tests.
3) Close database so WAL is closed prior to inducing corruption similar to what we did within Corruption tests.
Summary: Make RocksDb build and run on Windows to be functionally
complete and performant. All existing test cases run with no
regressions. Performance numbers are in the pull-request.
Test plan: make all of the existing unit tests pass, obtain perf numbers.
Co-authored-by: Praveen Rao praveensinghrao@outlook.com
Co-authored-by: Sherlock Huang baihan.huang@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Alex Zinoviev alexander.zinoviev@me.com
Co-authored-by: Dmitri Smirnov dmitrism@microsoft.com
