Summary:
I will move compression related options in a separate diff since this
diff is already pretty lengthy.
I guess I will also need to change JNI accordingly :(
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21915
Summary:
Materialize the hash index to avoid the soaring cpu/flash usage
when initializing the database.
Test Plan: existing unit tests passed
Reviewers: sdong, haobo
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18339
Summary:
This patch introduced a new table options that allows us to make
block-based table's index pluggable.
To support that new features:
* Code has been refacotred to be more flexible and supports this option well.
* More documentation is added for the existing obsecure functionalities.
* Big surgeon on DataBlockReader(), where the logic was really convoluted.
* Other small code cleanups.
The pluggablility will mostly affect development of internal modules
and won't change frequently, as a result I intentionally avoid
heavy-weight patterns (like factory) and try to make it simple.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16395
Summary:
Previous code is too convoluted and I must be drunk for letting
such code to be written without a second thought.
Thanks to the discussion with @sdong, I added the `Options` when
generating the flusher, thus avoiding the tricks.
Just FYI: I resisted to add Options in flush_block_policy.h since I
wanted to avoid cyclic dependencies: FlushBlockPolicy dpends on Options
and Options also depends FlushBlockPolicy... While I appreciate my
effort to prevent it, the old design turns out creating more troubles than
it tried to avoid.
Test Plan: ran ./table_test
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: sdong, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16503
Summary: In PlainTable, use one single byte to represent 8 bytes of internal bytes, if seqID = 0 and it is value type (which should be common for bottom most files). It is to save 7 bytes for uncompressed cases.
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15489
Summary:
Mixing index/filter blocks with data blocks resulted in some known
issues. To make sure in next release our users won't be affected,
we added a new option in BlockBasedTableFactory::TableOption to
conceal this functionality for now.
This patch also introduced a BlockBasedTableReader::OpenOptions,
which avoids the "infinite" growth of parameters in
BlockBasedTableReader::Open().
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb, tnovak
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15327
Summary:
Previously we introduce a `flush_block_policy_factory` in Options, however, that options is strongly releated to Table based tables.
It will make more sense to move it to block based table's own factory class.
Test Plan: make check to pass existing tests
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14211
Summary:
This patch is to address @haobo's comments on D13521:
1. rename Table to be TableReader and make its factory function to be GetTableReader
2. move the compression type selection logic out of TableBuilder but to compaction logic
3. more accurate comments
4. Move stat name constants into BlockBasedTable implementation.
5. remove some uncleaned codes in simple_table_db_test
Test Plan: pass test suites.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13785
Summary: This patch makes Table and TableBuilder a abstract class and make all the implementation of the current table into BlockedBasedTable and BlockedBasedTable Builder.
Test Plan: Make db_test.cc to work with block based table. Add a new test simple_table_db_test.cc where a different simple table format is implemented.
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke, vamsi
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13521
