Summary:
So a customized ldb tool can pass it's own Selector.
Such a selector is expected to call LDBCommand::SelectCommand
and then add some of its own customized commands
Test Plan: make ldb
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57249
Summary:
This is needed so that rocksdb users can add more
commands to the included ldb tool by adding more custom
commands.
Test Plan: make -j ldb
Reviewers: sdong, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57243
Summary:
Add an option --column_family option, so that users can query or update specific column family.
Also add an create column family parameter to make unit test easier.
Still need to add unit tests.
Test Plan: Will add a test case in ldb python test.
Reviewers: yhchiang, rven, andrewkr, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D53265
Summary: As part of cleaning up dependencies for tech debt week, we are moving ldb and sst_dump tools from util to tools, since they are tools.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48747
Summary:
When we first started, max_background_flushes was 0 by default and compaction thread was executing flushes (since there was no flush thread). Then, we switched the default max_background_flushes to 1. However, we still support the case where there is no flush thread and flushes are done in compaction. This is making our code a bit more complicated. By not supporting this use-case we can make our code simpler.
We have a special case that when you set max_background_flushes to 0, we
schedule the flush to execute on the compaction thread.
Test Plan: make check (there might be some unit tests that depend on this behavior)
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41931
Summary: Block reduce_levels_test in ROCKSDB_LITE as LDBCommand is not supported
Test Plan:
make reduce_levels_test -j64
OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make reduce_levels_test -j64
make check -j64
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41967
Summary:
Our existing test notation is very similar to what is used in gtest. It makes it easy to adopt what is different.
In this diff I modify existing [[ https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/Primer#Test_Fixtures:_Using_the_Same_Data_Configuration_for_Multiple_Te | test fixture ]] classes to inherit from `testing::Test`. Also for unit tests that use fixture class, `TEST` is replaced with `TEST_F` as required in gtest.
There are several custom `main` functions in our existing tests. To make this transition easier, I modify all `main` functions to fallow gtest notation. But eventually we can remove them and use implementation of `main` that gtest provides.
```lang=bash
% cat ~/transform
#!/bin/sh
files=$(git ls-files '*test\.cc')
for file in $files
do
if grep -q "rocksdb::test::RunAllTests()" $file
then
if grep -Eq '^class \w+Test {' $file
then
perl -pi -e 's/^(class \w+Test) {/${1}: public testing::Test {/g' $file
perl -pi -e 's/^(TEST)/${1}_F/g' $file
fi
perl -pi -e 's/(int main.*\{)/${1}::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);/g' $file
perl -pi -e 's/rocksdb::test::RunAllTests/RUN_ALL_TESTS/g' $file
fi
done
% sh ~/transform
% make format
```
Second iteration of this diff contains only scripted changes.
Third iteration contains manual changes to fix last errors and make it compilable.
Test Plan:
Build and notice no errors.
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make check -j55
```
Tests are still testing.
Reviewers: meyering, sdong, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35157
Summary:
gtest does not use exceptions to fail a unit test by design, and `ASSERT*`s are implemented using `return`. As a consequence we cannot use `ASSERT*` in a function that does not return `void` value ([[ https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/AdvancedGuide#Assertion_Placement | 1]]), and have to fix our existing code. This diff does this in a generic way, with no manual changes.
In order to detect all existing `ASSERT*` that are used in functions that doesn't return void value, I change the code to generate compile errors for such cases.
In `util/testharness.h` I defined `EXPECT*` assertions, the same way as `ASSERT*`, and redefined `ASSERT*` to return `void`. Then executed:
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make all -j55 -k 2> build.log
% perl -naF: -e 'print "-- -number=".$F[1]." ".$F[0]."\n" if /: error:/' \
build.log | xargs -L 1 perl -spi -e 's/ASSERT/EXPECT/g if $. == $number'
% make format
```
After that I reverted back change to `ASSERT*` in `util/testharness.h`. But preserved introduced `EXPECT*`, which is the same as `ASSERT*`. This will be deleted once switched to gtest.
This diff is independent and contains manual changes only in `util/testharness.h`.
Test Plan:
Make sure all tests are passing.
```lang=bash
% USE_CLANG=1 make check
```
Reviewers: igor, lgalanis, sdong, yufei.zhu, rven, meyering
Reviewed By: meyering
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33333
Summary: Those were introduced with 2fb1fea30f because the flushing behavior changed when max_background_flushes is > 0.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23577
Summary:
Fixed the following compile error.
tools/reduce_levels_test.cc:89:31: error: no matching function for call to 'InitFromCmdLineArgs'
LDBCommand* level_reducer = LDBCommand::InitFromCmdLineArgs(args);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./util/ldb_cmd.h:56:22: note: candidate function not viable: requires 3 arguments, but 1 was provided
static LDBCommand* InitFromCmdLineArgs(
^
./util/ldb_cmd.h:62:22: note: candidate function not viable: requires 4 arguments, but 1 was provided
static LDBCommand* InitFromCmdLineArgs(
^
1 error generated.
Test Plan:
make reduce_levels_test
./reduce_levels_test
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D19251
Summary: When I debug the unit test failures when enabling background flush thread, I feel the function names can be made clearer for people to understand. Also, if the names are fixed, in many places, some tests' bugs are obvious (and some of those tests are failing). This patch is to clean it up for future maintenance.
Test Plan: Run test suites.
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, xjin
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13431
Summary:
Change namespace from leveldb to rocksdb. This allows a single
application to link in open-source leveldb code as well as
rocksdb code into the same process.
Test Plan: compile rocksdb
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13287
Summary: Replace include/leveldb with include/rocksdb.
Test Plan:
make clean; make check
make clean; make release
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12489
Summary: simple sed command to replace NULL in tools directory. Was missed by the previous codemod.
Test Plan: it compiles
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D9621
Summary:
I changed the reduce_num_levels logic to avoid "compactRange()" call if the current number of levels in use (levels that contain files) is smaller than the new num of levels.
And that change breaks the assert in reduce_levels_test
Test Plan: run reduce_levels_test
Reviewers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: emayanke, sheki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D6651
Summary: as subject.
Test Plan: manually test it, will add a testcase
Reviewers: dhruba, MarkCallaghan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D6345
