Summary:
In WritePrepared there could be gap in sequence numbers. This breaks the trick we use in kPointInTimeRecovery which assume the first seq in the log right after the corrupted log is one larger than the last seq we read from the logs. To let this trick keep working, we add a dummy entry with the expected sequence to the first log right after recovery.
Also in WriteCommitted, if the log right after the corrupted log is empty, since it has no sequence number to let the sequential trick work, it is assumed as unexpected behavior. This is however expected to happen if we close the db after recovering from a corruption and before writing anything new to it. To remedy that, we apply the same technique by writing a dummy entry to the log that is created after the corrupted log.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6313
Differential Revision: D19458291
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 09bc49e574690085df45b034ca863ff315937e2d
Summary:
After secondary instance replays the logs from primary, certain files become
obsolete. The secondary should find these files, evict their table readers from
table cache and close them. If this is not done, the secondary will hold on to
these files and prevent their space from being freed.
Test plan (devserver):
```
$./db_secondary_test --gtest_filter=DBSecondaryTest.SecondaryCloseFiles
$make check
$./db_stress -ops_per_thread=100000 -enable_secondary=true -threads=32 -secondary_catch_up_one_in=10000 -clear_column_family_one_in=1000 -reopen=100
```
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6114
Differential Revision: D18769998
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 5d1f151567247196164e1b79d8402fa2045b9120
Summary:
`DBImplSecondary` calls `CheckConsistency()` during open. In the past, `DBImplSecondary` did not override this function thus `DBImpl::CheckConsistency()` is called.
The following can happen. The secondary instance is performing consistency check which calls `GetFileSize(file_path)` but the file at `file_path` is deleted by the primary instance. `DBImpl::CheckConsistency` does not account for this and fails the consistency check. This is undesirable. The solution is that, we call `DBImpl::CheckConsistency()` first. If it passes, then we are good. If not, we give it a second chance and handles the case of file(s) being deleted.
Test plan (on dev server):
```
$make clean && make -j20 all
$./db_secondary_test
```
All other existing unit tests must pass as well.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5469
Differential Revision: D15861845
Pulled By: riversand963
fbshipit-source-id: 507d72392508caed3cd003bb2e2aa43f993dd597
