Summary:
Quick fixes to examples to make it easier to get familiar with RocksDB for Windows users:
- Set proper temporary directory path on Windows for all examples (with C++17 we should start using std::filesystem)
- Fixed typo and got rid of warnings treated as errors in multi_processes_example.cc
- Get number of available cores on Windows in c_simple_example.c
- Add command to remove DB directory for Windows in compaction_filter_example.cc (print error, but carry on with example upon error, because error code is returned if there is no such directory on Windows)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7304
Reviewed By: jay-zhuang
Differential Revision: D23450900
Pulled By: pdillinger
fbshipit-source-id: 4256134deb6ae6bb267ed1bd69f814842b95f60f
Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
Add asserts to show the intentions of result explicitly.
Add examples to show the effect of optimistic transaction more clearly.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6074
Test Plan: `cd examples && make optimistic_transaction_example && ./optimistic_transaction_example`
Differential Revision: D18964309
Pulled By: cheng-chang
fbshipit-source-id: a524616ed9981edf2fd37ae61c5ed18c5cf25f55
Summary:
Initial implementation of Pessimistic Transactions. This diff contains the api changes discussed in D38913. This diff is pretty large, so let me know if people would prefer to meet up to discuss it.
MyRocks folks: please take a look at the API in include/rocksdb/utilities/transaction[_db].h and let me know if you have any issues.
Also, you'll notice a couple of TODOs in the implementation of RollbackToSavePoint(). After chatting with Siying, I'm going to send out a separate diff for an alternate implementation of this feature that implements the rollback inside of WriteBatch/WriteBatchWithIndex. We can then decide which route is preferable.
Next, I'm planning on doing some perf testing and then integrating this diff into MongoRocks for further testing.
Test Plan: Unit tests, db_bench parallel testing.
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong, yhchiang, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: hermanlee4, maykov, spetrunia, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40869
