Summary: This patch adds an option to table_reader_bench that queries run against DB level (which has one table). It is useful if user wants to see the extra costs DB level introduces.
Test Plan: Run the benchmark with and without the new parameter
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13863
Summary:
Remove all the files from the test dir before the test. The test failed when there were some old files still in the directory, since it checks the file counts.
This is what caused jenkins' test failures. It was running fine on my machine so it was hard to repro.
Test Plan:
1. create an extra 000001.log file in the test directory
2. run a ./deletefile_test - test failes
3. patch ./deletefile_test with this
4. test succeeds
Reviewers: haobo, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14097
Summary:
Created a unittest that verifies that automatic deletion performed by PurgeObsoleteFiles() works correctly.
Also, few small fixes on the logic part -- call version_set_->GetObsoleteFiles() in FindObsoleteFiles() instead of on some arbitrary positions.
Test Plan: Created a unit test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, nkg-
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14079
Summary:
We iterate until we find a different key than original key.
ikey is pointing to next key when we break out of loop.
After the loop we apply all merge operands meant for original key
on the next key!
Test Plan:
Need to give a build to Marcin to test out.
Revert Plan: OK
Task ID: #3181932
Reviewers: haobo, emayanke, dhruba
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14073
Summary: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13167 broke bloom filters. If filter is not in cache, we want to return true (safe thing). Am I right?
Test Plan: when benchmarking https://reviews.facebook.net/D14031 I got different results when using bloom filters vs. when not using them. This fixed the issue. I will also be putting this change to the other diff, but that one will probably be in review for longer time.
Reviewers: kailiu, dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14085
Summary: This diff leverage the existing block cache and extend it to cache index/filter block.
Test Plan:
Added new tests in db_test and table_test
The correctness is checked by:
1. make check
2. make valgrind_check
Performance is test by:
1. 10 times of build_tools/regression_build_test.sh on two versions of rocksdb before/after the code change. Test results suggests no significant difference between them. For the two key operatons `overwrite` and `readrandom`, the average iops are both 20k and ~260k, with very small variance).
2. db_stress.
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb, haobo, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13167
Summary:
mac and our dev server has totally differnt definition of uint64_t, therefore fixing the warning in mac has actually made code in linux uncompileable.
Test Plan:
make clean && make -j32
Summary: One more fix! In some cases, our filenames start with "/". Apparently, env_ can't handle filenames with double //
Test Plan:
deletefile_test does not include this line in the LOG anymore:
2013/11/12-18:11:43.150149 7fe4a6fff700 RenameFile logfile #3 FAILED -- IO error: /tmp/rocksdbtest-3574/deletefile_test//000003.log: No such file or directory
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14055
Summary: The work to make sure mac os compiles rocksdb is not completed yet. But at least we can start cleaning some warnings captured only by g++ from mac os..
Test Plan: ran make in mac os
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14049
Summary:
Broke the compile when I removed purge_log_after_memtable_flush.
sorrybus
Test Plan: make db_bench works now
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14037
Summary:
@haobo's suggestions from https://reviews.facebook.net/D13827
Renaming some variables, deprecating purge_log_after_flush, changing for loop into auto for loop.
I have not implemented deleting objects outside of mutex yet because it would require a big code change - we would delete object in db_impl, which currently does not know anything about object because it's defined in version_edit.h (FileMetaData). We should do it at some point, though.
Test Plan: Ran deletefile_test
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14025
Summary: FindObsoleteFiles() has to be called before PurgeObsoleteFiles() because FindObsoleteFiles() sets manifest_file_number, log_number and prev_log_number to valid values.
Test Plan: deletefile_test now works
Reviewers: dhruba, emayanke, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13995
Summary:
Changed leveldb documentation with rocksdb in doc/index.html. Added some of the important options from options.h to doc.
Also removed benchmark files and impl.h, since this is all replaced by RocksDB wikis.
Test Plan: -
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke, sdong
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13977
Summary: In our project, when writing to the database, we want to form the value as the concatenation of a small header and a larger payload. It's a shame to have to copy the payload just so we can give RocksDB API a linear view of the value. Since RocksDB makes a copy internally, it's easy to support gather writes.
Test Plan: write_batch_test, new test case
Reviewers: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13947
Summary:
Here's one solution we discussed on speeding up FindObsoleteFiles. Keep a set of all files in DBImpl and update the set every time we create a file. I probably missed few other spots where we create a file.
It might speed things up a bit, but makes code uglier. I don't really like it.
Much better approach would be to abstract all file handling to a separate class. Think of it as layer between DBImpl and Env. Having a separate class deal with file namings and deletion would benefit both code cleanliness (especially with huge DBImpl) and speed things up. It will take a huge effort to do this, though.
Let's discuss offline today.
Test Plan: Ran ./db_stress, verified that files are getting deleted
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13827
Summary: Changed the name and interface for creating HashSkipListRep. Forgot to change it in db_test.
Test Plan: make db_test
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13965
Summary: What @haobo done with TransformRep, now in TransformRepNoLock. Similar implementation, except that I made DynamicIterator a subclass of Iterator which makes me have less iterator initializations.
Test Plan: ./prefix_test. Seeing huge savings vs. TransformRep again!
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13953
Summary: Allow block based table to configure the way flushing the blocks. This feature will allow us to add support for prefix-aligned block.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: sdong
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13875
Summary: I this bug from valgrind report and found a place that may potentially leak memory.
Test Plan: re-ran the valgrind and no error any more
Reviewers: emayanke
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13959
Summary:
Added a new call LogFlush() that flushes the log contents to the OS buffers. We never call it with lock held.
We call it once for every Read/Write and often in compaction/flush process so the frequency should not be a problem.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13935
Summary: Added a prefix_seek flag in ReadOptions to indicate that Seek is prefix aware(might not return data with different prefix), and also not bound to a specific prefix. Multiple Seeks and range scans can be invoked on the same iterator. If a specific prefix is specified, this flag will be ignored. Just a quick prototype that works for PrefixHashRep, the new lockless memtable could be easily extended with this support too.
Test Plan: test it on Leaf
Reviewers: dhruba, kailiu, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13929
Summary:
Archive cleaning will still happen every WAL_ttl seconds
but archived logs will be deleted only if archive size
is greater then a WAL_size_limit value.
Empty archived logs will be deleted evety WAL_ttl.
Test Plan:
1. Unit tests pass.
2. Benchmark.
Reviewers: emayanke, dhruba, haobo, sdong, kailiu, igor
Reviewed By: emayanke
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13869
Summary: We have to be able to catch last few log outputs before a crash
Test Plan: no
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13917
Summary:
This fixes#3130525. Dhruba's suggestion and Tnovak's implementation :)
The issue was with SkipEmptyDataBlocksForward(), but I also changed SkipEmptyDataBlocksBackward(). Is that OK?
Test Plan: Run the logdevice test
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13911
Summary:
I'm sending this diff together with https://reviews.facebook.net/D13881 because it didn't allow me to send only the array one.
Here I also replaced unordered_map with just an array of shared_ptrs. This elminated all the locks.
I will run the new benchmark and post the results here.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13893
Summary: as title, half baked test for prefixhash memtable. Also contains deadlock test option
Test Plan: run it
Reviewers: igor, dhruba
Reviewed By: igor
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13887
Summary:
The problem was that there was only a single key-value in a block
and its compressibility was less than 88%. Rocksdb refuses to
compress a block unless its compresses to lesser than 88% of its
original size. If a block is not compressed, it does nto get inserted
into the compressed block cache.
Create the test data so that multiple records fit into the same
data block. This increases the compressibility of these data block.
Test Plan: ./db_test
Reviewers: kailiu, haobo
Reviewed By: kailiu
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13905
Summary:
Fixed valgrind error in DBTest.CompressedCache.
This fixes the valgrind error (thanks to Haobo). I am still trying to reproduce the test-failure case deterministically.
Test Plan: db_test
Reviewers: haobo
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13899
Summary:
strict essentially means that we MUST find the startsequence. Thus we should return if starteSequence is not found in the first file in case strict is set. This will take care of ending the iterator in case of permanent gaps due to corruptions in the log files
Also created NextImpl function that will have internal variable to distinguish whether Next is being called from StartSequence or by application.
Set NotFoudn::gaps status to give an indication of gaps happeneing.
Polished the inline documentation at various places
Test Plan:
* db_repl_stress test
* db_test relating to transaction log iterator
* fbcode/wormhole/rocksdb/rocks_log_iterator
* sigma production machine sigmafio032.prn1
Reviewers: dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13689
Summary:
Rocksdb can now support a uncompressed block cache, or a compressed
block cache or both. Lookups first look for a block in the
uncompressed cache, if it is not found only then it is looked up
in the compressed cache. If it is found in the compressed cache,
then it is uncompressed and inserted into the uncompressed cache.
It is possible that the same block resides in the compressed cache
as well as the uncompressed cache at the same time. Both caches
have their own individual LRU policy.
Test Plan: Unit test case attached.
Reviewers: kailiu, sdong, haobo, leveldb
Reviewed By: haobo
CC: xjin, haobo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D12675
Summary: Added an option --count_delim=<char> which takes the given character as delimiter ('.' by default) and reports count of each row type found in the db
Test Plan:
1. Created test in file (for DBDumperCommand) rocksdb/tools/ldb_test.py which puts various key value pair in db and checks the output using dump --count_delim ,--count_delim="." and --count_delim=",".
2. Created test in file (for InternalDumperCommand) rocksdb/tools/ldb_test.py which puts various key value pair in db and checks the output using dump --count_delim ,--count_delim="." and --count_delim=",".
3. Manually created a database with several keys of several type and verified by running the command
./ldb db=<path> dump --count_delim="<char>"
./ldb db=<path> idump --count_delim="<char>"
Reviewers: vamsi, dhruba, emayanke, kailiu
Reviewed By: vamsi
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13815
Summary:
I'm figuring out how Version[Set, Edit, ] classes work and I stumbled on this.
It doesn't seem that the comment is accurate anymore. What I read is when the manifest grows too big, create a new file (and not only when we call LogAndApply for the first time).
Test Plan: make check (currently running)
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu, emayanke
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13839
Summary: This might help with p99 performance, but does not solve the real problem. More discussion on #2947135
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: dhruba, haobo
Reviewed By: dhruba
CC: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13809
