Summary:
1. The latest change of DecideRateLimiterPriority in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9988 is reverted.
2. For https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/main/db/builder.cc#L345-L349
2.1. Remove `we will regrad this verification as user reads` from the comments.
2.2. `Do not set` the read_options.rate_limiter_priority to Env::IO_USER . Flush should be a background job.
2.3. Update db_rate_limiter_test.cc.
3. In IOOptions, mark `prio` as deprecated for future removal.
4. In `file_system.h`, mark `IOPriority` as deprecated for future removal.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10020
Test Plan: Unit tests.
Reviewed By: ajkr
Differential Revision: D36525317
Pulled By: gitbw95
fbshipit-source-id: 011ba421822f8a124e6d25a2661c4e242df6ad36
Summary:
### Context:
Background compactions and flush generate large reads and writes, and can be long running, especially for universal compaction. In some cases, this can impact foreground reads and writes by users.
### Solution
User, Flush, and Compaction reads share some code path. For this task, we update the rate_limiter_priority in ReadOptions for code paths (e.g. FindTable (mainly in BlockBasedTable::Open()) and various iterators), and eventually update the rate_limiter_priority in IOOptions for FSRandomAccessFile.
**This PR is for the Read path.** The **Read:** dynamic priority for different state are listed as follows:
| State | Normal | Delayed | Stalled |
| ----- | ------ | ------- | ------- |
| Flush (verification read in BuildTable()) | IO_USER | IO_USER | IO_USER |
| Compaction | IO_LOW | IO_USER | IO_USER |
| User | User provided | User provided | User provided |
We will respect the read_options that the user provided and will not set it.
The only sst read for Flush is the verification read in BuildTable(). It claims to be "regard as user read".
**Details**
1. Set read_options.rate_limiter_priority dynamically:
- User: Do not update the read_options. Use the read_options that the user provided.
- Compaction: Update read_options in CompactionJob::ProcessKeyValueCompaction().
- Flush: Update read_options in BuildTable().
2. Pass the rate limiter priority to FSRandomAccessFile functions:
- After calling the FindTable(), read_options is passed through GetTableReader(table_cache.cc), BlockBasedTableFactory::NewTableReader(block_based_table_factory.cc), and BlockBasedTable::Open(). The Open() needs some updates for the ReadOptions variable and the updates are also needed for the called functions, including PrefetchTail(), PrepareIOOptions(), ReadFooterFromFile(), ReadMetaIndexblock(), ReadPropertiesBlock(), PrefetchIndexAndFilterBlocks(), and ReadRangeDelBlock().
- In RandomAccessFileReader, the functions to be updated include Read(), MultiRead(), ReadAsync(), and Prefetch().
- Update the downstream functions of NewIndexIterator(), NewDataBlockIterator(), and BlockBasedTableIterator().
### Test Plans
Add unit tests.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9996
Reviewed By: anand1976
Differential Revision: D36452483
Pulled By: gitbw95
fbshipit-source-id: 60978204a4f849bb9261cb78d9bc1cb56d6008cf
Summary:
Users can set the priority for file reads associated with their operation by setting `ReadOptions::rate_limiter_priority` to something other than `Env::IO_TOTAL`. Rate limiting `VerifyChecksum()` and `VerifyFileChecksums()` is the motivation for this PR, so it also includes benchmarks and minor bug fixes to get that working.
`RandomAccessFileReader::Read()` already had support for rate limiting compaction reads. I changed that rate limiting to be non-specific to compaction, but rather performed according to the passed in `Env::IOPriority`. Now the compaction read rate limiting is supported by setting `rate_limiter_priority = Env::IO_LOW` on its `ReadOptions`.
There is no default value for the new `Env::IOPriority` parameter to `RandomAccessFileReader::Read()`. That means this PR goes through all callers (in some cases multiple layers up the call stack) to find a `ReadOptions` to provide the priority. There are TODOs for cases I believe it would be good to let user control the priority some day (e.g., file footer reads), and no TODO in cases I believe it doesn't matter (e.g., trace file reads).
The API doc only lists the missing cases where a file read associated with a provided `ReadOptions` cannot be rate limited. For cases like file ingestion checksum calculation, there is no API to provide `ReadOptions` or `Env::IOPriority`, so I didn't count that as missing.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/9424
Test Plan:
- new unit tests
- new benchmarks on ~50MB database with 1MB/s read rate limit and 100ms refill interval; verified with strace reads are chunked (at 0.1MB per chunk) and spaced roughly 100ms apart.
- setup command: `./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom,compact -db=/tmp/testdb -target_file_size_base=1048576 -disable_auto_compactions=true -file_checksum=true`
- benchmarks command: `strace -ttfe pread64 ./db_bench -benchmarks=verifychecksum,verifyfilechecksums -use_existing_db=true -db=/tmp/testdb -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=1048576 -rate_limit_bg_reads=1 -rate_limit_user_ops=true -file_checksum=true`
- crash test using IO_USER priority on non-validation reads with https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/9567 reverted: `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --max_key=1000000 --write_buffer_size=524288 --target_file_size_base=524288 --level_compaction_dynamic_level_bytes=true --duration=3600 --rate_limit_bg_reads=true --rate_limit_user_ops=true --rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=10485760 --interval=10`
Reviewed By: hx235
Differential Revision: D33747386
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: a2d985e97912fba8c54763798e04f006ccc56e0c
Bo Wang
gitbw95
Hui Xiao
Andrew Kryczka