Summary:
The vector returned by SnapshotList::GetAll could have duplicate entries if two separate snapshots have the same sequence number. However, when this vector is used in compaction the duplicate entires are of no use and could be safely ignored. Moreover not having duplicate entires simplifies reasoning in the compaction_iterator.cc code. For example when searching for the previous_snap we currently use the snapshot before the current one but the way the code uses that it expects it to be also less than the current snapshot, which would be simpler to read if there is no duplicate entry in the snapshot list.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4860
Differential Revision: D13615502
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: d45bf01213ead5f39db811f951802da6fcc3332b
Summary:
There are two issues with `VisibleToActiveSnapshot`:
1. If there are no snapshots, `oldest_snapshot` will be 0 and `VisibleToActiveSnapshot` will always return true. Since the method is used to decide whether it is safe to delete obsolete files, obsolete file won't be able to delete in this case.
2. The `auto` keyword of `auto snapshots = db_impl_->snapshots()` translate to a copy of `const SnapshotList` instead of a reference. Since copy constructor of `SnapshotList` is not defined, using the copy may yield unexpected result.
Issue 2 actually hide issue 1 from being catch by tests. During test `snapshots.empty()` can return false while it should actually be empty, and `snapshots.oldest()` return an invalid address, making `oldest_snapshot` being some random large number.
The issue was originally reported by BlobDB early adopter at Kuaishou.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4236
Differential Revision: D9188706
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: a0f2624b927cf9bf28c1bb534784fee5d106f5ea
Summary:
The is an optimization to reduce lookup in the CommitCache when querying IsInSnapshot. The optimization takes the smallest uncommitted data at the time that the snapshot was taken and if the sequence number of the read data is lower than that number it assumes the data as committed.
To implement this optimization two changes are required: i) The AddPrepared function must be called sequentially to avoid out of order insertion in the PrepareHeap (otherwise the top of the heap does not indicate the smallest prepare in future too), ii) non-2PC transactions also call AddPrepared if they do not commit in one step.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3649
Differential Revision: D7388630
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: b79506238c17467d590763582960d4d90181c600
Summary:
…db_test
options_settable_test won't pass UBSAN so disable it.
blob_db_test fails in UBSAN as SnapshotList doesn't initialize all the fields in dummy snapshot. Fix it. I don't understand why only blob_db_test fails though.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3477
Differential Revision: D6928681
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: e31dd300fcdecdfd4f6af279a0987fd0cdec5122
Summary:
Previously we store sequence number range of each blob files, and use the sequence number range to check if the file can be possibly visible by a snapshot. But it adds complexity to the code, since the sequence number is only available after a write. (The current implementation get sequence number by calling GetLatestSequenceNumber(), which is wrong.) With the patch, we are not storing sequence number range, and check if snapshot_sequence < obsolete_sequence to decide if the file is visible by a snapshot (previously we check if first_sequence <= snapshot_sequence < obsolete_sequence).
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3274
Differential Revision: D6571497
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: ca06479dc1fcd8782f6525b62b7762cd47d61909
Summary:
Blob db will keep blob file if data in the file is visible to an active snapshot. Before this patch it checks whether there is an active snapshot has sequence number greater than the earliest sequence in the file. This is problematic since we take snapshot on every read, if it keep having reads, old blob files will not be cleanup. Change to check if there is an active snapshot falls in the range of [earliest_sequence, obsolete_sequence) where obsolete sequence is
1. if data is relocated to another file by garbage collection, it is the latest sequence at the time garbage collection finish
2. otherwise, it is the latest sequence of the file
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3087
Differential Revision: D6182519
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: cdf4c35281f782eb2a9ad6a87b6727bbdff27a45
Summary:
Divide the old snapshots to two lists: a few that fit into a cached array and the rest in a vector, which is expected to be empty in normal cases. The former is to optimize concurrent reads from snapshots without requiring locks. It is done by an array of std::atomic, from which std::memory_order_acquire reads are compiled to simple read instructions in most of the x86_64 architectures.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2758
Differential Revision: D5660504
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 524fcf9a8e7f90a92324536456912a99aaa6740c
Summary:
Implement the main body of WritePrepared pseudo code. This includes PrepareInternal and CommitInternal, as well as AddCommitted which updates the commit map. It also provides a IsInSnapshot method that could be later called form the read path to decide if a version is in the read snapshot or it should other be skipped.
This patch lacks unit tests and does not attempt to offer an efficient implementation. The idea is that to have the API specified so that we can work on related tasks in parallel.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2713
Differential Revision: D5640021
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: bfa7a05e8d8498811fab714ce4b9c21530514e1c
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict. This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts. Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.
With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts. This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot. Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).
Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread. Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.
Test Plan: unit tests, db bench
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
Summary:
D51183 was reverted due to breaking the LITE build.
This diff is the same as D51183 but with a fix for the LITE BUILD(D51693)
Test Plan: run all unit tests
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51711
Summary:
D50475 enables using SST files for transaction write-conflict checking. In order for this to work, we need to make sure not to compact out SingleDeletes when there is an earlier transaction snapshot(D50295). If there is a long-held snapshot, this could reduce the benefit of the SingleDelete optimization.
This diff allows Transactions to mark snapshots as being used for write-conflict checking. Then, during compaction, we will be able to optimize SingleDeletes better in the future.
This diff adds a flag to SnapshotImpl which is used by Transactions. This diff also passes the earliest write-conflict snapshot's sequence number to CompactionIterator. This diff does not actually change Compaction (after this diff is pushed, D50295 will be able to use this information).
Test Plan: no behavior change, ran existing tests
Reviewers: rven, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51183
Summary: Implemented this simple wrapper for something else I was working on. Seemed like it makes sense to expose it instead of burying it in some random code.
Test Plan: added test
Reviewers: rven, kradhakrishnan, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43293
