Summary:
Issue scenario:
(1) We have 3 files in L1 and we issue a compaction that will compact them into 1 file in L2
(2) While compaction (1) is running, we flush a file into L0 and trigger another compaction that decide to move this file to L1 and then move it again to L2 (this file don't overlap with any other files)
(3) compaction (1) finishes and install the file it generated in L2, but this file overlap with the file we generated in (2) so we break the LSM consistency
Looks like this issue can be triggered by using non-exclusive manual compaction or AddFile()
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: hermanlee4, jkedgar, andrewkr, dhruba, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D64947
Summary:
Added 2 statistics in compaction job statistics, to
identify if single deletes are not meeting a matching key
(fallthrough) or single deletes are meeting a merge, delete or
another single delete (i.e. not the expected case of put).
Test Plan: Tested the statistics using write_stress and compaction_job_stats_test
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61749
Summary:
When subcompaction is used, all subcompactions share the same Compaction
pointer in CompactionJob while each subcompaction all keeps their mutable
stats in SubcompactionState. However, there're still some mutable part
that is currently store in the shared Compaction pointer.
This patch makes two changes:
1. Make the shared Compaction pointer const so that it can never be modified
during the compaction.
2. Move necessary states from Compaction to SubcompactionState.
3. Make functions of Compaction const if the function does not modify
its internal state.
Test Plan: rocksdb and MyRocks test
Reviewers: sdong, kradhakrishnan, andrewkr, IslamAbdelRahman
Reviewed By: IslamAbdelRahman
Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, yoshinorim, gunnarku, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D55923
Summary: For Transactions, we want to start using the SST files to do write conflict checking. To do this, we need to make sure that compaction never removes all writes if an earlier snapshot exists. So I had to change the way we process SingleDeletes to sometimes leave a SingleDelete behind when we encounter a Put followed by a SingleDelete. See the comments in this diff for a more detailed explanation.
Test Plan: added more unit tests
Reviewers: rven, igor, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50295
Summary:
D51183 was reverted due to breaking the LITE build.
This diff is the same as D51183 but with a fix for the LITE BUILD(D51693)
Test Plan: run all unit tests
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51711
Summary:
D50475 enables using SST files for transaction write-conflict checking. In order for this to work, we need to make sure not to compact out SingleDeletes when there is an earlier transaction snapshot(D50295). If there is a long-held snapshot, this could reduce the benefit of the SingleDelete optimization.
This diff allows Transactions to mark snapshots as being used for write-conflict checking. Then, during compaction, we will be able to optimize SingleDeletes better in the future.
This diff adds a flag to SnapshotImpl which is used by Transactions. This diff also passes the earliest write-conflict snapshot's sequence number to CompactionIterator. This diff does not actually change Compaction (after this diff is pushed, D50295 will be able to use this information).
Test Plan: no behavior change, ran existing tests
Reviewers: rven, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51183
Summary:
Provide an API for compaction filter to specify that it needs
to be applied even if there are snapshots.
Test Plan: DBTestCompactionFilter.CompactionFilterIgnoreSnapshot
Reviewers: yhchiang, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong, anthony
Reviewed By: anthony
Subscribers: yoshinorim, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D51087
Summary:
Separate a new class InternalIterator from class Iterator, when the look-up is done internally, which also means they operate on key with sequence ID and type.
This change will enable potential future optimizations but for now InternalIterator's functions are still the same as Iterator's.
At the same time, separate the cleanup function to a separate class and let both of InternalIterator and Iterator inherit from it.
Test Plan: Run all existing tests.
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, anthony, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, rven
Reviewed By: rven
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D48549
Summary:
Since Andres' internship is over, I took over https://reviews.facebook.net/D42555 and rebased and simplified it a bit.
The behavior in this diff is a bit simpler than in D42555:
* only merge operators are passed through FilterMergeValue(). If fitler function returns true, the merge operator is ignored
* compaction filter is *not* called on: 1) results of merge operations and 2) base values that are getting merged with merge operands (the second case was also true in previous diff)
Do we also need a compaction filter to get called on merge results?
Test Plan: make && make check
Reviewers: lovro, tnovak, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: noetzli, kolmike, leveldb, dhruba, sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47847
Summary:
This patch fixes#7460559. It introduces SingleDelete as a new database
operation. This operation can be used to delete keys that were never
overwritten (no put following another put of the same key). If an overwritten
key is single deleted the behavior is undefined. Single deletion of a
non-existent key has no effect but multiple consecutive single deletions are
not allowed (see limitations).
In contrast to the conventional Delete() operation, the deletion entry is
removed along with the value when the two are lined up in a compaction. Note:
The semantics are similar to @igor's prototype that allowed to have this
behavior on the granularity of a column family (
https://reviews.facebook.net/D42093 ). This new patch, however, is more
aggressive when it comes to removing tombstones: It removes the SingleDelete
together with the value whenever there is no snapshot between them while the
older patch only did this when the sequence number of the deletion was older
than the earliest snapshot.
Most of the complex additions are in the Compaction Iterator, all other changes
should be relatively straightforward. The patch also includes basic support for
single deletions in db_stress and db_bench.
Limitations:
- Not compatible with cuckoo hash tables
- Single deletions cannot be used in combination with merges and normal
deletions on the same key (other keys are not affected by this)
- Consecutive single deletions are currently not allowed (and older version of
this patch supported this so it could be resurrected if needed)
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, rven, anthony, yoshinorim, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: maykov, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43179
Summary:
The current build is failing on some platforms due to an __unused__ attribute.
This patch prevents the problem by using a pattern similar to MergeHelper
(assert not on the variable but inside a condition that uses the variable). We
should have better error handling in both cases in the future.
Test Plan: make clean all check
Reviewers: rven, anthony, yhchiang, sdong, igor, aekmekji
Reviewed By: aekmekji
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46623
Summary:
Builder and CompactionJob share a lot of fairly complex code. This patch
refactors this code into a separate class, the CompactionIterator. Because the
shared code is fairly complex, this patch hopefully improves maintainability.
While there are is a lot of potential for further improvements, the patch is
intentionally pretty close to the original structure because the change is
already complex enough.
Test Plan: make clean all check && ./db_stress
Reviewers: rven, anthony, yhchiang, sdong, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D46197
