Summary:
When running `make rocksdbjava V=1`, it currently does
not print out the original command but something odd instead:
mkdir -p jl/db
This patch tries to fix this issue.
Test Plan: make rocksdbjava V=1
Reviewers: igor, sdong, IslamAbdelRahman, meyering
Reviewed By: meyering
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47061
Summary: This patch fixed couple build issues of rocksdbjavastaticrelease.
Test Plan: make rocksdbjavastaticrelease
Reviewers: sdong, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D45915
Summary:
Fixed RocksJava test failure of shouldSetTestCappedPrefixExtractor
by adding the missing native implementation of
useCappedPrefixExtractor.
Test Plan:
make jclean
make rocksdbjava -j32
make jtest
Reviewers: igor, anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43551
Summary:
Merge pull request #665 by adamretter
Exposes BackupEngine from C++ to the Java API. Previously only BackupableDB was available
Test Plan: BackupEngineTest.java
Reviewers: fyrz, igor, ankgup87, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42873
Summary:
Whenever a Java class implements equals(), it has to implement hashCode(), otherwise
there might be weird behavior when inserting instances of the class in a hash map for
example. This adds two missing hashCode() implementations and extends tests to test
the hashCode() implementations.
Test Plan: make jtest
Reviewers: rven, igor, sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: anthony, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43017
Summary:
While working on https://reviews.facebook.net/D43017 , I realized
that some Java tests are failing due to a deprecated option.
This patch removes the offending tests, adds @Deprecated annotations
to the Java interface and removes the corresponding functions in
rocksjni
Test Plan: make jtest (all tests are passing now)
Reviewers: rven, igor, sdong, anthony, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D43035
Summary:
When we first started, max_background_flushes was 0 by default and compaction thread was executing flushes (since there was no flush thread). Then, we switched the default max_background_flushes to 1. However, we still support the case where there is no flush thread and flushes are done in compaction. This is making our code a bit more complicated. By not supporting this use-case we can make our code simpler.
We have a special case that when you set max_background_flushes to 0, we
schedule the flush to execute on the compaction thread.
Test Plan: make check (there might be some unit tests that depend on this behavior)
Reviewers: IslamAbdelRahman, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41931
Summary:
ROCKSDB_WARNING is only defined if either ROCKSDB_PLATFORM_POSIX or OS_WIN is defined. This works well for building rocksdb with its own build scripts. But this won't work when an outside project(like mongodb) doesn't define ROCKSDB_PLATFORM_POSIX.
This fix defines ROCKSDB_WARNING for all platforms. No idea if its defined correctly on non-posix,non-windows platforms but this is no worse that the current situation where this macro is missing on unexpected platforms.
This fix should hopefully fix anyone whose build broke now that we've switched from using #warning to Pragma (to support windows). Unfortunately, while mongo-rocks compiles, it ignores the Pragma and doesn't print a warning. I have not been able to figure out a way to implement this portably on all platforms.
Of course, an alternate solution would be to just get rid of ROCKSDB_WARNING and live with include file redirects indefinitely. Thoughts?
Test Plan: build rocks, build mongorocks
Reviewers: igor, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D42477
Summary:
The option bottommost_level_compaction was introduced lately.
This option breaks the Java API behavior. To prevent the library
from doing so we set that option to a fixed value in Java.
In future we are going to remove that portion and replace the
hardcoded options using a more flexible way.
Fixed bug introduced by WriteBatchWithIndex Patch
Lately icanadi changed the behavior of WriteBatchWithIndex.
See commit: 821cff114e
This commit solves problems introduced by above mentioned commit.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: adamretter, ankgup87, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: igor, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40647
Summary:
Rewrite Java tests compactRangeToLevel and compactRangeToLevelColumnFamily
to make them more deterministic and robust.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: anthony, fyrz, adamretter, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40941
Summary:
This diff update DB::CompactRange to use RangeCompactionOptions instead of using multiple parameters
Old CompactRange is still available but deprecated
Test Plan:
make all check
make rocksdbjava
USE_CLANG=1 make all
OPT=-DROCKSDB_LITE make release
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40209
Summary: Optimistic transactions supporting begin/commit/rollback semantics. Currently relies on checking the memtable to determine if there are any collisions at commit time. Not yet implemented would be a way of enuring the memtable has some minimum amount of history so that we won't fail to commit when the memtable is empty. You should probably start with transaction.h to get an overview of what is currently supported.
Test Plan: Added a new test, but still need to look into stress testing.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: adamretter, MarkCallaghan, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33435
Summary:
For transactions, we are using the memtables to validate that there are no write conflicts. But after flushing, we don't have any memtables, and transactions could fail to commit. So we want to someone keep around some extra history to use for conflict checking. In addition, we want to provide a way to increase the size of this history if too many transactions fail to commit.
After chatting with people, it seems like everyone prefers just using Memtables to store this history (instead of a separate history structure). It seems like the best place for this is abstracted inside the memtable_list. I decide to create a separate list in MemtableListVersion as using the same list complicated the flush/installalflushresults logic too much.
This diff adds a new parameter to control how much memtable history to keep around after flushing. However, it sounds like people aren't too fond of adding new parameters. So I am making the default size of flushed+not-flushed memtables be set to max_write_buffers. This should not change the maximum amount of memory used, but make it more likely we're using closer the the limit. (We are now postponing deleting flushed memtables until the max_write_buffer limit is reached). So while we might use more memory on average, we are still obeying the limit set (and you could argue it's better to go ahead and use up memory now instead of waiting for a write stall to happen to test this limit).
However, if people are opposed to this default behavior, we can easily set it to 0 and require this parameter be set in order to use transactions.
Test Plan: Added a xfunc test to play around with setting different values of this parameter in all tests. Added testing in memtablelist_test and planning on adding more testing here.
Reviewers: sdong, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37443
Summary: Update HISTORY.md for 3.10.0
Test Plan: no code chagne.
Reviewers: sdong, rven, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35871
Summary:
In 3.10 the C++ code was extended with a MemEnv implementation. This
is now also available in RocksJava.
Changes:
- Extraced abstract super class Env
- Introduced RocksMemEnv
- Remove unnecessary disposeInternal method. The disposal of the default environment is managed by C++ so there needs to be no disposeInternal method in Java.
- Introduced a RocksMemEnvTest, which is aligned with the C++ equivalent.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: adamretter, yhchiang, ankgup87
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35619
Summary:
RocksDB offers the possibility to set different compression types
on a per level basis. This shall be also available using RocksJava.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: adamretter, yhchiang, ankgup87
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35577
Summary:
Before this change overflowing size_t values led to a checked Exception.
After that change:
size_t overflows on 32-Bit architecture throw now an IllegalArgumentException,
which removes the necessity for a developer to catch these Exceptions explicitly.
This is especially an advantage for developers targeting 64-Bit systems because
it is not necessary anymore to catch exceptions which are never thrown on a 64-Bit
system.
Test Plan:
make clean jclean rocksdbjava jtest
mvn -f rocksjni.pom package
Reviewers: adamretter, yhchiang, ankgup87
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34923
Summary:
table_cache_remove_scan_count_limit is marked as deprecated in RocksDB C++.
(see rocksdb/options.h). This patch made necessary changes on RocksJava
side.
Test Plan:
make rocksdbjava -j32
make jtest
Reviewers: rven, igor, fyrz, adamretter, ankgup87, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D35355
Summary: It is no longer used by the implementation, so we should also remove it from the public API.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34971
