Summary:
When dynamically linking two binaries together, different builds of RocksDB from two sources might cause errors. To provide a tool for user to solve the problem, the RocksDB namespace is changed to a flag which can be overridden in build time.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6433
Test Plan: Build release, all and jtest. Try to build with ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE with another flag.
Differential Revision: D19977691
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f2d0972e1c31d75339ac48478f34f6cfcfb3e
Summary:
This is a continuation of https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5320/files
I open a new mr for these purposes, half a year has past since the old mr is posted so it's almost impossible to fulfill some points below on the old mr, especially 5)
1) add validation modes for optimistic txns
2) modify unittests to test both modes
3) make format
4) refine hash functor
5) push to master
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/6240
Differential Revision: D19301296
fbshipit-source-id: 5b5b3cbd39558f43947f7d2dec6cd31a06386edb
Summary:
This change models Optimistic Tx db after Pessimistic TX db. The motivation for this change is to make the ptr polymorphic so it can be held by the same raw or smart ptr.
Currently, due to the inheritance of the Opt Tx db not being rooted in the manner of Pess Tx from a single DB root it is more difficult to write clean code and have clear ownership of the database in cases when options dictate instantiate of plan DB, Pess Tx DB or Opt tx db.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3566
Differential Revision: D7184502
Pulled By: yiwu-arbug
fbshipit-source-id: 31d06efafd79497bb0c230e971857dba3bd962c3
Summary:
Initial implementation of Pessimistic Transactions. This diff contains the api changes discussed in D38913. This diff is pretty large, so let me know if people would prefer to meet up to discuss it.
MyRocks folks: please take a look at the API in include/rocksdb/utilities/transaction[_db].h and let me know if you have any issues.
Also, you'll notice a couple of TODOs in the implementation of RollbackToSavePoint(). After chatting with Siying, I'm going to send out a separate diff for an alternate implementation of this feature that implements the rollback inside of WriteBatch/WriteBatchWithIndex. We can then decide which route is preferable.
Next, I'm planning on doing some perf testing and then integrating this diff into MongoRocks for further testing.
Test Plan: Unit tests, db_bench parallel testing.
Reviewers: igor, rven, sdong, yhchiang, yoshinorim
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: hermanlee4, maykov, spetrunia, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D40869
Summary: Optimistic transactions supporting begin/commit/rollback semantics. Currently relies on checking the memtable to determine if there are any collisions at commit time. Not yet implemented would be a way of enuring the memtable has some minimum amount of history so that we won't fail to commit when the memtable is empty. You should probably start with transaction.h to get an overview of what is currently supported.
Test Plan: Added a new test, but still need to look into stress testing.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, rven, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: adamretter, MarkCallaghan, leveldb, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33435
