Summary:
Two things:
1. Use hash-based index for data column family
2. Use Get() instead of Iterator Seek() when DB is opened read-only
Test Plan: added read-only test in unit test
Reviewers: yinwang
Reviewed By: yinwang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22323
Summary: Add a virtual function in table factory that will print table options
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22149
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
tested on my mac
make rocksdbjava
make jtest
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21963
Summary:
I will move compression related options in a separate diff since this
diff is already pretty lengthy.
I guess I will also need to change JNI accordingly :(
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21915
Summary:
- Implement Prepare method
- Rewrite performance tests in cuckoo_table_reader_test to write new file only if one doesn't already exist.
- Add performance tests for batch lookup along with prefetching.
Test Plan:
./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
Results (We get better results if we used int64 comparator instead of string comparator (TBD in future diffs)):
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.208us (4.8 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.182us (5.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.161us (6.2 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.161us (6.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.163us (6.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.252us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.192us (5.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.195us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.191us (5.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.194us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.228us (4.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.185us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.186us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.188us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.325us (3.1 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.196us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.199us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.196us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.209us (4.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22167
Summary:
Currently, PlainTable must use mmap_reads. When PlainTable is used but
allow_mmap_reads is not set, rocksdb will fail in flush.
This diff improve Options sanitization and add MmapReadRequired() to
TableFactory.
Test Plan:
export ROCKSDB_TESTS=PlainTableOptionsSanitizeTest
make db_test -j32
./db_test
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: you, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21939
Summary:
ManifestDumpCommand::DoCommand was allocating a VersionSet and never
freeing it.
Test Plan: make
Reviewers: igor
Reviewed By: igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22221
Summary: A previous change triggered a change by mistake: DestroyDB() will keep info logs under DB directory. Revert the unintended change.
Test Plan: Add a unit test case to verify it.
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22209
Summary: We need to start compression at level 1, while OptimizeForLevelComapaction() only sets up rocksdb to start compressing at level 2. I also adjusted some other things.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: yinwang
Reviewed By: yinwang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22203
Summary: Make table_reader_bench cover all the three table formats.
Test Plan: Run it using three options
Reviewers: radheshyamb, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22137
Summary: I was checking some functions in coding.h and coding.cc when I noticed these unused functions. Let's remove them.
Test Plan: compiles
Reviewers: sdong, ljin, yhchiang, dhruba
Reviewed By: dhruba
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22077
Summary:
Adding num_column_families flag. Adding support for column families in DoWrite and ReadRandom methods.
[Igor, please let me know if this approach sounds good. I shall add it to other methods too.]
Test Plan: Ran fillseq on 1M keys and 10 Column families and ran readrandom.
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21387
Summary:
Add WriteBatchWithIndex so that a user can query data out of a WriteBatch, to support MongoDB's read-its-own-write.
WriteBatchWithIndex uses a skiplist to store the binary index. The index stores the offset of the entry in the write batch. When searching for a key, the key for the entry is read by read the entry from the write batch from the offset.
Define a new iterator class for querying data out of WriteBatchWithIndex. A user can create an iterator of the write batch for one column family, seek to a key and keep calling Next() to see next entries.
I will add more unit tests if people are OK about this API.
Test Plan:
make all check
Add unit tests.
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, MarkCallaghan, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, xjin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21381
Summary: Bump up version after we've cut 3.4
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22047
Summary: Adding flags to use cuckoo table SST in db_bench.cc
Test Plan: Ran benchmark with fillseq and readrandom
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21729
Summary:
auto_roll_logger_test fails from time to time. I wasn't able to repro
the issue but by looking at the code, it seems like the initial ctime_
value can be set to the boundary of the second so it may still have a
chance to get rolled when interval is set to 1 second.
```
util/auto_roll_logger_test.cc:120: failed: 118 > 708
==19470== Syscall param msync(start) points to unaddressable byte(s)
==19470== at 0x4E46CE0: __msync_nocancel (in
/usr/local/fbcode/gcc-4.8.1-glibc-2.17/lib/libpthread-2.17.so)
==19470== by 0x584EFB: access_mem (Ginit.c:137)
==19470== by 0x5834E3: _ULx86_64_access_reg (libunwind_i.h:162)
==19470== by 0x585601: apply_reg_state (Gparser.c:742)
==19470== by 0x5866BE: _ULx86_64_dwarf_find_save_locs (Gparser.c:883)
==19470== by 0x584550: _ULx86_64_dwarf_step (Gstep.c:34)
==19470== by 0x583653: _ULx86_64_step (Gstep.c:71)
==19470== by 0x583FD2: _ULx86_64_tdep_trace (Gtrace.c:217)
==19470== by 0x5831C3: backtrace (backtrace.c:69)
Test Plan: ./auto_roll_logger_test
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor
Reviewed By: igor
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21951
Summary:
Avoid retrying to read property block from a table when it does not exist
in updating stats for compensating deletion entries.
In addition, ReadTableProperties() now returns Status::NotFound instead
of Status::Corruption when table properties does not exist in the file.
Test Plan:
make db_test -j32
export ROCKSDB_TESTS=CompactionDeleteionTrigger
./db_test
Reviewers: ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21867
Summary: The prefix and postfix operators were mixed up in the autovector class.
Test Plan: Inspection
Reviewers: sdong, kailiu
Reviewed By: kailiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21873
Summary:
1. Support purging info logs from a separate paths from DB path. Refactor the codes of generating info log prefixes so that it can be called when generating new files and scanning log directory.
2. Fix the bug of not scanning multiple DB paths (should only impact multiple DB paths)
Test Plan:
Add unit test for generating and parsing info log files
Add end-to-end test in db_test
Reviewers: yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb, igor, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21801
Summary:
1. Check status of CreateNewBackup. If status is not OK, then throw.
2. Add purgeOldBackups API
Test Plan:
make test
make sample
Reviewers: haobo, sdong, zzbennett, swapnilghike, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21753
Summary:
1. fix segment error when dumping old sst format (no properties nor stats)
2. Enable dumpping old sst format
Test Plan:
Generate block based sst file with "properties", and one with "stats" and one without neither.
Read it using sst_dump
Reviewers: ljin, igor, yhchiang, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21837
Summary: This is a linux-specific system call.
Test Plan: ran db_bench
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: haobo, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21183
Summary:
Was looking at an issue. All options are the same except
compaction_filter was missed from a newer package. Our option dump does
not capture that
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21765
Summary: as title
Test Plan: make release
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang
Reviewed By: yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21717
Summary: 1. write db MANIFEST, CURRENT, IDENTITY, sst files, log files to log before open
Test Plan: run db and check LOG file
Reviewers: ljin, yhchiang, igor, dhruba, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21459
Summary: as title
Test Plan:
make all check
ran db_bench and saw seek stats at the end
Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21651
Summary: as title
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21201
