56c4a9c760
9 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sameet Agarwal
|
e7c434c364 |
Add columnfamily option optimize_filters_for_hits to optimize for key hits only
Summary:
Summary:
Added a new option to ColumnFamllyOptions - optimize_filters_for_hits. This option can be used in the case where most
accesses to the store are key hits and we dont need to optimize performance for key misses.
This is useful when you have a very large database and most of your lookups succeed. The option allows the store to
not store and use filters in the last level (the largest level which contains data). These filters can take a large amount of
space for large databases (in memory and on-disk). For the last level, these filters are only useful for key misses and not
for key hits. If we are not optimizing for key misses, we can choose to not store these filters for that level.
This option is only provided for BlockBasedTable. We skip the filters when we are compacting
Test Plan:
1. Modified db_test toalso run tests with an additonal option (skip_filters_on_last_level)
2. Added another unit test to db_test which specifically tests that filters are being skipped
Reviewers: rven, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: lgalanis, yoshinorim, MarkCallaghan, rven, dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D33717
|
||
Lei Jin
|
581442d446 |
option to choose module when calculating CuckooTable hash
Summary: Using module to calculate hash makes lookup ~8% slower. But it has its benefit: file size is more predictable, more space enffient Test Plan: db_bench Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong Reviewed By: sdong Subscribers: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23691 |
||
|
Lei Jin
|
51af7c326c |
CuckooTable: add one option to allow identity function for the first hash function
Summary: MurmurHash becomes expensive when we do millions Get() a second in one thread. Add this option to allow the first hash function to use identity function as hash function. It results in QPS increase from 3.7M/s to ~4.3M/s. I did not observe improvement for end to end RocksDB performance. This may be caused by other bottlenecks that I will address in a separate diff. Test Plan: ``` [ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=0 ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64 ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.272us (3.7 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120 With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.138us (7.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120 With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120 With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.142us (7.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120 With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.144us (6.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.123us (8.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.121us (8.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.112us (8.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.251us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.107us (9.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.099us (10.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.116us (8.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.095us (10.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.096us (10.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.105us (9.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320 [ljin@dev1964 rocksdb] ./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf --file_dir=/dev/shm --write --identity_as_first_hash=1 ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExists ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyExistsWithUint64Comparator ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIterator ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.CheckIteratorUint64 ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.WhenKeyNotFound ==== Test CuckooReaderTest.TestReadPerformance With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.230us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 125829120 With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 125829120 With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 125829120 With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 125829120 With 125829120 items, utilization is 93.75%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 125829120 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.159us (6.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 104857600 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 104857600 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 104857600 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 104857600 With 104857600 items, utilization is 78.12%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 104857600 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 83886080 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 83886080 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.077us (12.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 83886080 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 83886080 With 83886080 items, utilization is 62.50%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 83886080 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.218us (4.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0, # of found keys 73400320 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10, # of found keys 73400320 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25, # of found keys 73400320 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50, # of found keys 73400320 With 73400320 items, utilization is 54.69%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100, # of found keys 73400320 ``` Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang Reviewed By: igor Subscribers: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D23451 |
||
|
Lei Jin
|
5665e5e285 |
introduce ImmutableOptions
Summary: As a preparation to support updating some options dynamically, I'd like to first introduce ImmutableOptions, which is a subset of Options that cannot be changed during the course of a DB lifetime without restart. ColumnFamily will keep both Options and ImmutableOptions. Any component below ColumnFamily should only take ImmutableOptions in their constructor. Other options should be taken from APIs, which will be allowed to adjust dynamically. I am yet to make changes to memtable and other related classes to take ImmutableOptions in their ctor. That can be done in a seprate diff as this one is already pretty big. Test Plan: make all check Reviewers: yhchiang, igor, sdong Reviewed By: sdong Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22545 |
||
Radheshyam Balasundaram
|
d20b8cfaa1 |
Improve Cuckoo Table Reader performance. Inlined hash function and number of buckets a power of two.
Summary: Use inlined hash functions instead of function pointer. Make number of buckets a power of two and use bitwise and instead of mod. After these changes, we get almost 50% improvement in performance. Results: With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.231us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0 Time taken per op is 0.229us (4.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0 Time taken per op is 0.185us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0 With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.108us (9.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10 Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10 Time taken per op is 0.103us (9.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10 With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.101us (9.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25 Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 25 Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25 With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50 Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50 Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50 With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.102us (9.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Time taken per op is 0.115us (8.7 Mqps) with batch size of 100 With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0 Time taken per op is 0.155us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0 Time taken per op is 0.152us (6.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0 With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.089us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10 Time taken per op is 0.084us (11.9 Mqps) with batch size of 10 Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 10 With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.087us (11.5 Mqps) with batch size of 25 Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25 Time taken per op is 0.093us (10.8 Mqps) with batch size of 25 With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.094us (10.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50 Time taken per op is 0.094us (10.7 Mqps) with batch size of 50 Time taken per op is 0.093us (10.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50 With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.092us (10.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Time taken per op is 0.089us (11.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 100 With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0 Time taken per op is 0.168us (6.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0 Time taken per op is 0.190us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0 With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.081us (12.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10 Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10 Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 10 With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25 Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25 Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25 With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.076us (13.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50 Time taken per op is 0.072us (13.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50 Time taken per op is 0.072us (13.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50 With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Time taken per op is 0.074us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100 With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.190us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0 Time taken per op is 0.186us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0 Time taken per op is 0.184us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0 With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10 Time taken per op is 0.070us (14.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10 Time taken per op is 0.072us (14.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10 With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 25 Time taken per op is 0.072us (14.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25 Time taken per op is 0.071us (14.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25 With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50 Time taken per op is 0.071us (14.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50 Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50 With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2. Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100 Test Plan: make check all make valgrind_check make asan_check Reviewers: sdong, ljin Reviewed By: ljin Subscribers: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22539 |
||
|
Radheshyam Balasundaram
|
7f71448388 |
Implementing a cache friendly version of Cuckoo Hash
Summary: This implements a cache friendly version of Cuckoo Hash in which, in case of collission, we try to insert in next few locations. The size of the neighborhood to check is taken as an input parameter in builder and stored in the table.
Test Plan:
make check all
cuckoo_table_{db,reader,builder}_test
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22455
|
||
|
Radheshyam Balasundaram
|
4142a3e783 |
Adding a user comparator for comparing Uint64 slices.
Summary:
- New Uint64 comparator
- Modify Reader and Builder to take custom user comparators instead of bytewise comparator
- Modify logic for choosing unused user key in builder
- Modify iterator logic in reader
- test changes
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_{builder,reader,db}_test
make check all
Reviewers: ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22377
|
||
|
Lei Jin
|
a98badff16 |
print table options
Summary: Add a virtual function in table factory that will print table options Test Plan: make release Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong Reviewed By: sdong Subscribers: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22149 |
||
|
Radheshyam Balasundaram
|
9674c11d01 |
Integrating Cuckoo Hash SST Table format into RocksDB
Summary: Contains the following changes: - Implementation of cuckoo_table_factory - Adding cuckoo table into AdaptiveTableFactory - Adding cuckoo_table_db_test, similar to lines of plain_table_db_test - Minor fixes to Reader: When a key is found in the table, return the key found instead of the search key. - Minor fixes to Builder: Add table properties that are required by Version::UpdateTemporaryStats() during Get operation. Don't define curr_node as a reference variable as the memory locations may get reassigned during tree.push_back operation, leading to invalid memory access. Test Plan: cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf cuckoo_table_builder_test cuckoo_table_db_test make check all make valgrind_check make asan_check Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang, ljin Reviewed By: ljin Subscribers: leveldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21219 |