Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
anand76
fefd4b98c5 Introduce a new MultiGet batching implementation ()
Summary:
This PR introduces a new MultiGet() API, with the underlying implementation grouping keys based on SST file and batching lookups in a file. The reason for the new API is twofold - the definition allows callers to allocate storage for status and values on stack instead of std::vector, as well as return values as PinnableSlices in order to avoid copying, and it keeps the original MultiGet() implementation intact while we experiment with batching.

Batching is useful when there is some spatial locality to the keys being queries, as well as larger batch sizes. The main benefits are due to -
1. Fewer function calls, especially to BlockBasedTableReader::MultiGet() and FullFilterBlockReader::KeysMayMatch()
2. Bloom filter cachelines can be prefetched, hiding the cache miss latency

The next step is to optimize the binary searches in the level_storage_info, index blocks and data blocks, since we could reduce the number of key comparisons if the keys are relatively close to each other. The batching optimizations also need to be extended to other formats, such as PlainTable and filter formats. This also needs to be added to db_stress.

Benchmark results from db_bench for various batch size/locality of reference combinations are given below. Locality was simulated by offsetting the keys in a batch by a stride length. Each SST file is about 8.6MB uncompressed and key/value size is 16/100 uncompressed. To focus on the cpu benefit of batching, the runs were single threaded and bound to the same cpu to eliminate interference from other system events. The results show a 10-25% improvement in micros/op from smaller to larger batch sizes (4 - 32).

Batch   Sizes

1        | 2        | 4         | 8      | 16  | 32

Random pattern (Stride length 0)
4.158 | 4.109 | 4.026 | 4.05 | 4.1 | 4.074        - Get
4.438 | 4.302 | 4.165 | 4.122 | 4.096 | 4.075 - MultiGet (no batching)
4.461 | 4.256 | 4.277 | 4.11 | 4.182 | 4.14        - MultiGet (w/ batching)

Good locality (Stride length 16)
4.048 | 3.659 | 3.248 | 2.99 | 2.84 | 2.753
4.429 | 3.728 | 3.406 | 3.053 | 2.911 | 2.781
4.452 | 3.45 | 2.833 | 2.451 | 2.233 | 2.135

Good locality (Stride length 256)
4.066 | 3.786 | 3.581 | 3.447 | 3.415 | 3.232
4.406 | 4.005 | 3.644 | 3.49 | 3.381 | 3.268
4.393 | 3.649 | 3.186 | 2.882 | 2.676 | 2.62

Medium locality (Stride length 4096)
4.012 | 3.922 | 3.768 | 3.61 | 3.582 | 3.555
4.364 | 4.057 | 3.791 | 3.65 | 3.57 | 3.465
4.479 | 3.758 | 3.316 | 3.077 | 2.959 | 2.891

dbbench command used (on a DB with 4 levels, 12 million keys)-
TEST_TMPDIR=/dev/shm numactl -C 10  ./db_bench.tmp -use_existing_db=true -benchmarks="readseq,multireadrandom" -write_buffer_size=4194304 -target_file_size_base=4194304 -max_bytes_for_level_base=16777216 -num=12000000 -reads=12000000 -duration=90 -threads=1 -compression_type=none -cache_size=4194304000 -batch_size=32 -disable_auto_compactions=true -bloom_bits=10 -cache_index_and_filter_blocks=true -pin_l0_filter_and_index_blocks_in_cache=true -multiread_batched=true -multiread_stride=4
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5011

Differential Revision: D14348703

Pulled By: anand1976

fbshipit-source-id: 774406dab3776d979c809522a67bedac6c17f84b
2019-04-11 14:28:26 -07:00
Abhishek Madan
81b6b09f6b Remove v1 RangeDelAggregator ()
Summary:
Now that v2 is fully functional, the v1 aggregator is removed.
The v2 aggregator has been renamed.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4778

Differential Revision: D13495930

Pulled By: abhimadan

fbshipit-source-id: 9d69500a60a283e79b6c4fa938fc68a8aa4d40d6
2018-12-17 17:33:46 -08:00
Andrey Zagrebin
aeed4f0749 fix performance regression introduced by MergeOperator.ShouldMerge ()
Summary:
This PR addresses issue  and implements the following approach to fix it:
 - adds `MergeContext::GetOperandsDirectionForward` and `MergeContext::GetOperandsDirectionBackward` to query merge operands in a specific order
 - `MergeContext::GetOperands` becomes a shortcut for `MergeContext::GetOperandsDirectionForward`
 - pass `MergeContext::GetOperandsDirectionBackward` to `MergeOperator::ShouldMerge` and document the order
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/4266

Differential Revision: D9360750

Pulled By: sagar0

fbshipit-source-id: 20cb73ff017760b062ecdcf4382560767086e092
2018-08-16 10:58:05 -07:00
Siying Dong
3c327ac2d0 Change RocksDB License
Summary: Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2589

Differential Revision: D5431502

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: 8ebf8c87883daa9daa54b2303d11ce01ab1f6f75
2017-07-15 16:11:23 -07:00
Siying Dong
d616ebea23 Add GPLv2 as an alternative license.
Summary: Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2226

Differential Revision: D4967547

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: dd3b58ae1e7a106ab6bb6f37ab5c88575b125ab4
2017-04-27 18:06:12 -07:00
Islam AbdelRahman
16e225f70d Fix MergeContext::copied_operands_ strings moving
Summary:
MergeContext::copied_operands contain strings that MergeContext::operand_list_ Slices point to
It's possible that when MergeContext::copied_operands grow, these strings are moved and there place in memory is changed, this will cause MergeContext::operand_list_ to point to invalid memory.
fix this problem by using unique_ptr<string> instead of string

Test Plan: run tests under mac/clang

Reviewers: sdong, yiwu

Reviewed By: yiwu

Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D61023
2016-07-25 15:31:41 -07:00
Islam AbdelRahman
68a8e6b8fa Introduce FullMergeV2 (eliminate memcpy from merge operators)
Summary:
This diff update the code to pin the merge operator operands while the merge operation is done, so that we can eliminate the memcpy cost, to do that we need a new public API for FullMerge that replace the std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice>

This diff is stacked on top of D56493 and D56511

In this diff we
- Update FullMergeV2 arguments to be encapsulated in MergeOperationInput and MergeOperationOutput which will make it easier to add new arguments in the future
- Replace std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice> to pass operands
- Replace MergeContext std::deque with std::vector (based on a simple benchmark I ran https://gist.github.com/IslamAbdelRahman/78fc86c9ab9f52b1df791e58943fb187)
- Allow FullMergeV2 output to be an existing operand

```
[Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :       0.607 micros/op 1648235 ops/sec; 16121.2 MB/s
readseq      :       0.478 micros/op 2091546 ops/sec; 20457.2 MB/s
readseq      :       0.252 micros/op 3972081 ops/sec; 38850.5 MB/s
readseq      :       0.237 micros/op 4218328 ops/sec; 41259.0 MB/s
readseq      :       0.247 micros/op 4043927 ops/sec; 39553.2 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :       3.935 micros/op 254140 ops/sec; 2485.7 MB/s
readseq      :       3.722 micros/op 268657 ops/sec; 2627.7 MB/s
readseq      :       3.149 micros/op 317605 ops/sec; 3106.5 MB/s
readseq      :       3.125 micros/op 320024 ops/sec; 3130.1 MB/s
readseq      :       4.075 micros/op 245374 ops/sec; 2400.0 MB/s
```

```
[Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=1000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :       3.472 micros/op 288018 ops/sec; 2817.1 MB/s
readseq      :       2.304 micros/op 434027 ops/sec; 4245.2 MB/s
readseq      :       1.163 micros/op 859845 ops/sec; 8410.0 MB/s
readseq      :       1.192 micros/op 838926 ops/sec; 8205.4 MB/s
readseq      :       1.250 micros/op 800000 ops/sec; 7824.7 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      24.025 micros/op 41623 ops/sec;  407.1 MB/s
readseq      :      18.489 micros/op 54086 ops/sec;  529.0 MB/s
readseq      :      18.693 micros/op 53495 ops/sec;  523.2 MB/s
readseq      :      23.621 micros/op 42335 ops/sec;  414.1 MB/s
readseq      :      18.775 micros/op 53262 ops/sec;  521.0 MB/s

```

```
[Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key]

[FullMergeV2]
$ DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions
readseq      :      14.741 micros/op 67837 ops/sec;  663.5 MB/s
readseq      :       1.029 micros/op 971446 ops/sec; 9501.6 MB/s
readseq      :       0.974 micros/op 1026229 ops/sec; 10037.4 MB/s
readseq      :       0.965 micros/op 1036080 ops/sec; 10133.8 MB/s
readseq      :       0.943 micros/op 1060657 ops/sec; 10374.2 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      16.735 micros/op 59755 ops/sec;  584.5 MB/s
readseq      :       3.029 micros/op 330151 ops/sec; 3229.2 MB/s
readseq      :       3.136 micros/op 318883 ops/sec; 3119.0 MB/s
readseq      :       3.065 micros/op 326245 ops/sec; 3191.0 MB/s
readseq      :       3.014 micros/op 331813 ops/sec; 3245.4 MB/s
```

```
[Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key]

DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10-operands-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions

[FullMergeV2]
readseq      :      24.325 micros/op 41109 ops/sec;  402.1 MB/s
readseq      :       1.470 micros/op 680272 ops/sec; 6653.7 MB/s
readseq      :       1.231 micros/op 812347 ops/sec; 7945.5 MB/s
readseq      :       1.091 micros/op 916590 ops/sec; 8965.1 MB/s
readseq      :       1.109 micros/op 901713 ops/sec; 8819.6 MB/s

[master]
readseq      :      27.257 micros/op 36687 ops/sec;  358.8 MB/s
readseq      :       4.443 micros/op 225073 ops/sec; 2201.4 MB/s
readseq      :       5.830 micros/op 171526 ops/sec; 1677.7 MB/s
readseq      :       4.173 micros/op 239635 ops/sec; 2343.8 MB/s
readseq      :       4.150 micros/op 240963 ops/sec; 2356.8 MB/s
```

Test Plan: COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make check -j64

Reviewers: yhchiang, andrewkr, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: lovro, andrewkr, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57075
2016-07-20 09:49:03 -07:00
Islam AbdelRahman
8a1a603fdb Eliminate std::deque initialization while iterating over merge operands
Summary:
This patch is similar to D52563, When we iterate over a DB with merge operands we keep creating std::queue to store the operands, optimize this by reusing merge_operands_ data member

Before the patch

```
./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --db="/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/" --merge_operator="put" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000

DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
mergerandom  :       3.757 micros/op 266141 ops/sec;   29.4 MB/s ( updates:10000)
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.413 micros/op 2423538 ops/sec;  268.1 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.451 micros/op 2219071 ops/sec;  245.5 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.420 micros/op 2382039 ops/sec;  263.5 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.408 micros/op 2452017 ops/sec;  271.3 MB/s

DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
mergerandom  :       3.947 micros/op 253376 ops/sec;   28.0 MB/s ( updates:10000)
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.441 micros/op 2266473 ops/sec;  250.7 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.471 micros/op 2122033 ops/sec;  234.8 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.440 micros/op 2271407 ops/sec;  251.3 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.429 micros/op 2331471 ops/sec;  257.9 MB/s
```

with the patch

```
./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --db="/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/" --merge_operator="put" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000

DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
mergerandom  :       4.080 micros/op 245092 ops/sec;   27.1 MB/s ( updates:10000)
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.308 micros/op 3241843 ops/sec;  358.6 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.312 micros/op 3200408 ops/sec;  354.0 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.332 micros/op 3013962 ops/sec;  333.4 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.300 micros/op 3328017 ops/sec;  368.2 MB/s

DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
mergerandom  :       3.973 micros/op 251705 ops/sec;   27.8 MB/s ( updates:10000)
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.320 micros/op 3123752 ops/sec;  345.6 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.335 micros/op 2986641 ops/sec;  330.4 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.339 micros/op 2950047 ops/sec;  326.4 MB/s
DB path: [/dev/shm/bench_merge_memcpy_on_the_fly/]
readseq      :       0.319 micros/op 3131565 ops/sec;  346.4 MB/s
```

Test Plan: make check -j64

Reviewers: yhchiang, andrewkr, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D56031
2016-04-01 15:48:55 -07:00
Baraa Hamodi
21e95811d1 Updated all copyright headers to the new format. 2016-02-09 15:12:00 -08:00
agiardullo
711465ccec API to fetch from both a WriteBatchWithIndex and the db
Summary:
Added a couple functions to WriteBatchWithIndex to make it easier to query the value of a key including reading pending writes from a batch.  (This is needed for transactions).

I created write_batch_with_index_internal.h to use to store an internal-only helper function since there wasn't a good place in the existing class hierarchy to store this function (and it didn't seem right to stick this function inside WriteBatchInternal::Rep).

Since I needed to access the WriteBatchEntryComparator, I moved some helper classes from write_batch_with_index.cc into write_batch_with_index_internal.h/.cc.  WriteBatchIndexEntry, ReadableWriteBatch, and WriteBatchEntryComparator are all unchanged (just moved to a different file(s)).

Test Plan: Added new unit tests.

Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, sdong, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D38037
2015-05-11 14:51:51 -07:00
Yueh-Hsuan Chiang
cda4006e87 Enhance partial merge to support multiple arguments
Summary:
* PartialMerge api now takes a list of operands instead of two operands.
* Add min_pertial_merge_operands to Options, indicating the minimum
  number of operands to trigger partial merge.
* This diff is based on Schalk's previous diff (D14601), but it also
  includes necessary changes such as updating the pure C api for
  partial merge.

Test Plan:
* make check all
* develop tests for cases where partial merge takes more than two
  operands.

TODOs (from Schalk):
* Add test with min_partial_merge_operands > 2.
* Perform benchmarks to measure the performance improvements (can probably
  use results of task #2837810.)
* Add description of problem to doc/index.html.
* Change wiki pages to reflect the interface changes.

Reviewers: haobo, igor, vamsi

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16815
2014-03-24 17:57:13 -07:00
Siying Dong
ef2211a9ca [RocksDB Performance Branch] Introduce MergeContext to Lazily Initialize merge operand list
Summary: In get operations, merge_operands is only used in few cases. Lazily initialize it can reduce average latency in some cases

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: haobo, kailiu, dhruba

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: igor, nkg-, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14415
2013-12-06 10:28:59 -08:00