Siying Dong
21696ba502
Replace dynamic_cast<>
...
Summary:
Replace dynamic_cast<> so that users can choose to build with RTTI off, so that they can save several bytes per object, and get tiny more memory available.
Some nontrivial changes:
1. Add Comparator::GetRootComparator() to get around the internal comparator hack
2. Add the two experiemental functions to DB
3. Add TableFactory::GetOptionString() to avoid unnecessary casting to get the option string
4. Since 3 is done, move the parsing option functions for table factory to table factory files too, to be symmetric.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2645
Differential Revision: D5502723
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: fd13cec5601cf68a554d87bfcf056f2ffa5fbf7c
2017-07-28 16:27:16 -07:00
Islam AbdelRahman
68a8e6b8fa
Introduce FullMergeV2 (eliminate memcpy from merge operators)
...
Summary:
This diff update the code to pin the merge operator operands while the merge operation is done, so that we can eliminate the memcpy cost, to do that we need a new public API for FullMerge that replace the std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice>
This diff is stacked on top of D56493 and D56511
In this diff we
- Update FullMergeV2 arguments to be encapsulated in MergeOperationInput and MergeOperationOutput which will make it easier to add new arguments in the future
- Replace std::deque<std::string> with std::vector<Slice> to pass operands
- Replace MergeContext std::deque with std::vector (based on a simple benchmark I ran https://gist.github.com/IslamAbdelRahman/78fc86c9ab9f52b1df791e58943fb187 )
- Allow FullMergeV2 output to be an existing operand
```
[Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key]
DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=10000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000
[FullMergeV2]
readseq : 0.607 micros/op 1648235 ops/sec; 16121.2 MB/s
readseq : 0.478 micros/op 2091546 ops/sec; 20457.2 MB/s
readseq : 0.252 micros/op 3972081 ops/sec; 38850.5 MB/s
readseq : 0.237 micros/op 4218328 ops/sec; 41259.0 MB/s
readseq : 0.247 micros/op 4043927 ops/sec; 39553.2 MB/s
[master]
readseq : 3.935 micros/op 254140 ops/sec; 2485.7 MB/s
readseq : 3.722 micros/op 268657 ops/sec; 2627.7 MB/s
readseq : 3.149 micros/op 317605 ops/sec; 3106.5 MB/s
readseq : 3.125 micros/op 320024 ops/sec; 3130.1 MB/s
readseq : 4.075 micros/op 245374 ops/sec; 2400.0 MB/s
```
```
[Everything in Memtable | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key]
DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="mergerandom,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --merge_keys=1000 --num=10000 --disable_auto_compactions --value_size=10240 --write_buffer_size=1000000000
[FullMergeV2]
readseq : 3.472 micros/op 288018 ops/sec; 2817.1 MB/s
readseq : 2.304 micros/op 434027 ops/sec; 4245.2 MB/s
readseq : 1.163 micros/op 859845 ops/sec; 8410.0 MB/s
readseq : 1.192 micros/op 838926 ops/sec; 8205.4 MB/s
readseq : 1.250 micros/op 800000 ops/sec; 7824.7 MB/s
[master]
readseq : 24.025 micros/op 41623 ops/sec; 407.1 MB/s
readseq : 18.489 micros/op 54086 ops/sec; 529.0 MB/s
readseq : 18.693 micros/op 53495 ops/sec; 523.2 MB/s
readseq : 23.621 micros/op 42335 ops/sec; 414.1 MB/s
readseq : 18.775 micros/op 53262 ops/sec; 521.0 MB/s
```
```
[Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 1 operand per key]
[FullMergeV2]
$ DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions
readseq : 14.741 micros/op 67837 ops/sec; 663.5 MB/s
readseq : 1.029 micros/op 971446 ops/sec; 9501.6 MB/s
readseq : 0.974 micros/op 1026229 ops/sec; 10037.4 MB/s
readseq : 0.965 micros/op 1036080 ops/sec; 10133.8 MB/s
readseq : 0.943 micros/op 1060657 ops/sec; 10374.2 MB/s
[master]
readseq : 16.735 micros/op 59755 ops/sec; 584.5 MB/s
readseq : 3.029 micros/op 330151 ops/sec; 3229.2 MB/s
readseq : 3.136 micros/op 318883 ops/sec; 3119.0 MB/s
readseq : 3.065 micros/op 326245 ops/sec; 3191.0 MB/s
readseq : 3.014 micros/op 331813 ops/sec; 3245.4 MB/s
```
```
[Everything in Block cache | 10K operands | 10 KB each | 10 operand per key]
DEBUG_LEVEL=0 make db_bench -j64 && ./db_bench --benchmarks="readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq,readseq" --merge_operator="max" --num=100000 --db="/dev/shm/merge-random-10-operands-10K-10KB" --cache_size=1000000000 --use_existing_db --disable_auto_compactions
[FullMergeV2]
readseq : 24.325 micros/op 41109 ops/sec; 402.1 MB/s
readseq : 1.470 micros/op 680272 ops/sec; 6653.7 MB/s
readseq : 1.231 micros/op 812347 ops/sec; 7945.5 MB/s
readseq : 1.091 micros/op 916590 ops/sec; 8965.1 MB/s
readseq : 1.109 micros/op 901713 ops/sec; 8819.6 MB/s
[master]
readseq : 27.257 micros/op 36687 ops/sec; 358.8 MB/s
readseq : 4.443 micros/op 225073 ops/sec; 2201.4 MB/s
readseq : 5.830 micros/op 171526 ops/sec; 1677.7 MB/s
readseq : 4.173 micros/op 239635 ops/sec; 2343.8 MB/s
readseq : 4.150 micros/op 240963 ops/sec; 2356.8 MB/s
```
Test Plan: COMPILE_WITH_ASAN=1 make check -j64
Reviewers: yhchiang, andrewkr, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: lovro, andrewkr, dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57075
2016-07-20 09:49:03 -07:00
Igor Canadi
d80ce7f99a
Compaction filter on merge operands
...
Summary:
Since Andres' internship is over, I took over https://reviews.facebook.net/D42555 and rebased and simplified it a bit.
The behavior in this diff is a bit simpler than in D42555:
* only merge operators are passed through FilterMergeValue(). If fitler function returns true, the merge operator is ignored
* compaction filter is *not* called on: 1) results of merge operations and 2) base values that are getting merged with merge operands (the second case was also true in previous diff)
Do we also need a compaction filter to get called on merge results?
Test Plan: make && make check
Reviewers: lovro, tnovak, rven, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: noetzli, kolmike, leveldb, dhruba, sdong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D47847
2015-10-07 09:30:03 -07:00
