Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Igor Canadi
4daea66343 Turn on -Wmissing-prototypes
Summary: Compiling for iOS has by default turned on -Wmissing-prototypes, which causes rocksdb to fail compiling. This diff turns on -Wmissing-prototypes in our compile options and cleans up all functions with missing prototypes.

Test Plan: compiles

Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong

Reviewed By: ljin

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17649
2014-04-09 21:17:14 -07:00
Lei Jin
8d007b4aaf Consolidate SliceTransform object ownership
Summary:
(1) Fix SanitizeOptions() to also check HashLinkList. The current
dynamic case just happens to work because the 2 classes have the same
layout.
(2) Do not delete SliceTransform object in HashSkipListFactory and
HashLinkListFactory destructor. Reason: SanitizeOptions() enforces
prefix_extractor and SliceTransform to be the same object when
Hash**Factory is used. This makes the behavior strange: when
Hash**Factory is used, prefix_extractor will be released by RocksDB. If
other memtable factory is used, prefix_extractor should be released by
user.

Test Plan: db_bench && make asan_check

Reviewers: haobo, igor, sdong

Reviewed By: igor

CC: leveldb, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16587
2014-03-10 12:56:46 -07:00
Kai Liu
b2e7ee8b41 Followup code refactor on plain table
Summary:
Fixed most comments in https://reviews.facebook.net/D15429.
Still have some remaining comments left.

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: sdong, haobo

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15885
2014-02-13 15:27:59 -08:00
Kai Liu
59cffe02c4 Benchmark table reader wiht nanoseconds
Summary: nanosecnods gave us better view of the performance, especially when some operations are fast so that micro seconds may only reveal less informative results.

Test Plan:
sample output:

    ./table_reader_bench --plain_table --time_unit=nanosecond
    =======================================================================================================
    InMemoryTableSimpleBenchmark:           PlainTable   num_key1:   4096   num_key2:   512   non_empty
    =======================================================================================================
    Histogram (unit: nanosecond):
    Count: 6291456  Average: 475.3867  StdDev: 556.05
    Min: 135.0000  Median: 400.1817  Max: 33370.0000
    Percentiles: P50: 400.18 P75: 530.02 P99: 887.73 P99.9: 8843.26 P99.99: 9941.21
    ------------------------------------------------------
    [     120,     140 )        2   0.000%   0.000%
    [     140,     160 )      452   0.007%   0.007%
    [     160,     180 )    13683   0.217%   0.225%
    [     180,     200 )    54353   0.864%   1.089%
    [     200,     250 )   101004   1.605%   2.694%
    [     250,     300 )   729791  11.600%  14.294% ##
    [     300,     350 )   616070   9.792%  24.086% ##
    [     350,     400 )  1628021  25.877%  49.963% #####
    [     400,     450 )   647220  10.287%  60.250% ##
    [     450,     500 )   577206   9.174%  69.424% ##
    [     500,     600 )  1168585  18.574%  87.999% ####
    [     600,     700 )   506875   8.057%  96.055% ##
    [     700,     800 )   147878   2.350%  98.406%
    [     800,     900 )    42633   0.678%  99.083%
    [     900,    1000 )    16304   0.259%  99.342%
    [    1000,    1200 )     7811   0.124%  99.466%
    [    1200,    1400 )     1453   0.023%  99.490%
    [    1400,    1600 )      307   0.005%  99.494%
    [    1600,    1800 )       81   0.001%  99.496%
    [    1800,    2000 )       18   0.000%  99.496%
    [    2000,    2500 )        8   0.000%  99.496%
    [    2500,    3000 )        6   0.000%  99.496%
    [    3500,    4000 )        3   0.000%  99.496%
    [    4000,    4500 )      116   0.002%  99.498%
    [    4500,    5000 )     1144   0.018%  99.516%
    [    5000,    6000 )     1087   0.017%  99.534%
    [    6000,    7000 )     2403   0.038%  99.572%
    [    7000,    8000 )     9840   0.156%  99.728%
    [    8000,    9000 )    12820   0.204%  99.932%
    [    9000,   10000 )     3881   0.062%  99.994%
    [   10000,   12000 )      135   0.002%  99.996%
    [   12000,   14000 )      159   0.003%  99.998%
    [   14000,   16000 )       58   0.001%  99.999%
    [   16000,   18000 )       30   0.000% 100.000%
    [   18000,   20000 )       14   0.000% 100.000%
    [   20000,   25000 )        2   0.000% 100.000%
    [   25000,   30000 )        2   0.000% 100.000%
    [   30000,   35000 )        1   0.000% 100.000%

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, sdong

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16113
2014-02-13 13:57:36 -08:00
sdong
b5140a0361 Fix table_reader_bench and add it to "make"
Summary: Fix table_reader_bench after some interface changes. Add it to make to avoid future breaking

Test Plan: make table_reader_bench and run it with different options.

Reviewers: kailiu, haobo

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: igor, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16107
2014-02-12 18:31:02 -08:00
Siying Dong
d169b67680 [Performance Branch] PlainTable to encode rows with seqID 0, value type using 1 internal byte.
Summary: In PlainTable, use one single byte to represent 8 bytes of internal bytes, if seqID = 0 and it is value type (which should be common for bottom most files). It is to save 7 bytes for uncompressed cases.

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: igor, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15489
2014-02-03 12:19:30 -08:00
kailiu
4f6cb17bdb First phase API clean up
Summary:
Addressed all the issues in https://reviews.facebook.net/D15447.
Now most table-related modules are hidden from user land.

Test Plan: make check

Reviewers: sdong, haobo, dhruba

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15525
2014-02-03 00:30:43 -08:00
Siying Dong
abaf26266d [RocksDB] [Performance Branch] Some Changes to PlainTable format
Summary:
Some changes to PlainTable format:
(1) support variable key length
(2) use user defined slice transformer to extract prefixes
(3) Run some test cases against PlainTable in db_test and table_test

Test Plan: test db_test

Reviewers: haobo, kailiu

CC: dhruba, igor, leveldb, nkg-

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14457
2013-12-20 12:08:35 -08:00
Siying Dong
dfa1460d88 [For Performance Branch] Bloom filter in PlainTableIterator::Seek() - Update 1
Summary:
Address @haobo's comments in D14277

Test Plan: ./indexed_table_db_test

Reviewers: haobo

CC:

Task ID: #

Blame Rev:
2013-11-21 23:33:45 -08:00
Siying Dong
718488abc5 Add BloomFilter to PlainTableIterator::Seek()
Summary:
This patch adds a simple bloom filter in PlainTableIterator::Seek()

Test Plan: N/A

Reviewers:

CC:

Task ID: #

Blame Rev:
2013-11-21 22:26:39 -08:00
Siying Dong
b59d4d5a50 A Simple Plain Table
Summary:
A Simple plain table format. No block structure. When creating the table reader, scanning the full table to create indexes.

Test Plan:Add unit test

Reviewers:haobo,dhruba,kailiu

CC:

Task ID: #

Blame Rev:
2013-11-20 18:44:22 -08:00
Siying Dong
55baa3d955 Add an option to table_reader_bench to access the table from DB And Iterating non-existing prefix case.
Summary: This patch adds an option to table_reader_bench that queries run against DB level (which has one table). It is useful if user wants to see the extra costs DB level introduces.

Test Plan: Run the benchmark with and without the new parameter

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba, kailiu

Reviewed By: kailiu

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13863
2013-11-15 22:23:12 -08:00
Siying Dong
82b7e37f6e Fix a bug of table_reader_bench
Summary: Iterator benchmark case is timed incorrectly. Fix it

Test Plan: Run the benchmark

Reviewers: haobo, dhruba

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13845
2013-10-31 15:26:06 -07:00
Siying Dong
7caadf2e52 A very simple benchmark to measure Table implemenation's Get() And Iterator performance
Summary: It is a very simple benchmark to measure a Table implementation's Get() and iterator performance if all the data is in memory.

Test Plan: N/A

Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, kailiu

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D13743
2013-10-31 13:38:54 -07:00