Summary:
We estimate number of reads per SST files, by updating the counter per file in sampled read requests. This information can later be used to trigger compactions to improve read performacne.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2417
Differential Revision: D5193528
Pulled By: siying
fbshipit-source-id: b4241c5ad0eaf444b61afb53f8e6290d9f5da2df
Summary:
PinnableSlice
Summary:
Currently the point lookup values are copied to a string provided by the
user. This incures an extra memcpy cost. This patch allows doing point lookup
via a PinnableSlice which pins the source memory location (instead of
copying their content) and releases them after the content is consumed
by the user. The old API of Get(string) is translated to the new API
underneath.
Here is the summary for improvements:
value 100 byte: 1.8% regular, 1.2% merge values
value 1k byte: 11.5% regular, 7.5% merge values
value 10k byte: 26% regular, 29.9% merge values
The improvement for merge could be more if we extend this approach to
pin the merge output and delay the full merge operation until the user
actually needs it. We have put that for future work.
PS:
Sometimes we observe a small decrease in performance when switching from
t5452014 to this patch but with the old Get(string) API. The d
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1756
Differential Revision: D4391738
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: 6f3edd3
Summary:
Currently the point lookup values are copied to a string provided by the user.
This incures an extra memcpy cost. This patch allows doing point lookup
via a PinnableSlice which pins the source memory location (instead of
copying their content) and releases them after the content is consumed
by the user. The old API of Get(string) is translated to the new API
underneath.
Here is the summary for improvements:
1. value 100 byte: 1.8% regular, 1.2% merge values
2. value 1k byte: 11.5% regular, 7.5% merge values
3. value 10k byte: 26% regular, 29.9% merge values
The improvement for merge could be more if we extend this approach to
pin the merge output and delay the full merge operation until the user
actually needs it. We have put that for future work.
PS:
Sometimes we observe a small decrease in performance when switching from
t5452014 to this patch but with the old Get(string) API. The difference
is a little and could be noise. More importantly it is safely
cancelled
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1732
Differential Revision: D4374613
Pulled By: maysamyabandeh
fbshipit-source-id: a077f1a
Summary:
Previously we used TableCache::NewIterator() for multiple purposes (data
block iterator and range deletion iterator), and returned non-ok status in
the data block iterator. In one case where the caller only used the range
deletion block iterator (9e7cf3469b/db/version_set.cc (L965-L973)),
we didn't check/free the data block iterator containing non-ok status, which
caused a valgrind error.
So, this diff decouples creation of data block and range deletion block iterators,
and updates the callers accordingly. Both functions can return non-ok status
in an InternalIterator. Since the non-ok status is returned in an iterator that the
callers will definitely use, it should be more usable/less error-prone.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1513
Differential Revision: D4181423
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 835b8f5
Summary:
During Get()/MultiGet(), build up a RangeDelAggregator with range
tombstones as we search through live memtable, immutable memtables, and
SST files. This aggregator is then used by memtable.cc's SaveValue() and
GetContext::SaveValue() to check whether keys are covered.
added tests for Get on memtables/files; end-to-end tests mainly in https://reviews.facebook.net/D64761
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1456
Differential Revision: D4111271
Pulled By: ajkr
fbshipit-source-id: 6e388d4
Summary:
Currently, transactions can fail even if there is no actual write conflict. This is due to relying on only the memtables to check for write-conflicts. Users have to tune memtable settings to try to avoid this, but it's hard to figure out exactly how to tune these settings.
With this diff, TransactionDB will use both memtables and SST files to determine if there are any write conflicts. This relies on the fact that BlockBasedTable stores sequence numbers for all writes that happen after any open snapshot. Also, D50295 is needed to prevent SingleDelete from disappearing writes (the TODOs in this test code will be fixed once the other diff is approved and merged).
Note that Optimistic transactions will still rely on tuning memtable settings as we do not want to read from SST while on the write thread. Also, memtable settings can still be used to reduce how often TransactionDB needs to read SST files.
Test Plan: unit tests, db bench
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, IslamAbdelRahman, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb, yoshinorim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D50475
Summary:
Implementation of a table-level row cache.
It only caches point queries done through the `DB::Get` interface, queries done through the `Iterator` interface will completely skip the cache.
Supports snapshots and merge operations.
Test Plan: Ran `make valgrind_check commit-prereq`
Reviewers: igor, philipp, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D39849
Summary:
We have addded new stats and perf_context for measuring the merge and filter operation time consumption.
We have bounded all the merge operations within the GUARD statment and collected the total time for these operations in the DB.
Test Plan: WIP
Reviewers: rven, yhchiang, kradhakrishnan, igor, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: dhruba
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D34377
Summary:
Intead of passing callback function pointer and its arg on Table::Get()
interface, passing GetContext. This makes the interface cleaner and
possible better perf. Also adding a fast pass for SaveValue()
Test Plan: make all check
Reviewers: igor, yhchiang, sdong
Reviewed By: sdong
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D24057
