Commit Graph

16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dmitri Smirnov
15ba4d6c4b Address MS Visual Studio 2017 issue with autovector
Summary:
This addresses https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/2262
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2333

Differential Revision: D5097941

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: fb33582bfe7883ecc3f6da028703982522b5f75f
2017-05-22 10:57:06 -07:00
Siying Dong
d616ebea23 Add GPLv2 as an alternative license.
Summary: Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/2226

Differential Revision: D4967547

Pulled By: siying

fbshipit-source-id: dd3b58ae1e7a106ab6bb6f37ab5c88575b125ab4
2017-04-27 18:06:12 -07:00
Manuel Ung
2005c88a75 Implement non-exclusive locks
Summary:
This is an implementation of non-exclusive locks for pessimistic transactions. It is relatively simple and does not prevent starvation (ie. it's possible that request for exclusive access will never be granted if there are always threads holding shared access). It is done by changing `KeyLockInfo` to hold an set a transaction ids, instead of just one, and adding a flag specifying whether this lock is currently held with exclusive access or not.

Some implementation notes:
- Some lock diagnostic functions had to be updated to return a set of transaction ids for a given lock, eg. `GetWaitingTxn` and `GetLockStatusData`.
- Deadlock detection is a bit more complicated since a transaction can now wait on multiple other transactions. A BFS is done in this case, and deadlock detection depth is now just a limit on the number of transactions we visit.
- Expirable transactions do not work efficiently with shared locks at the moment, but that's okay for now.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1573

Differential Revision: D4239097

Pulled By: lth

fbshipit-source-id: da7c074
2016-12-05 17:39:17 -08:00
Yi Wu
1543d5d92e Report memory usage by memtable insert hints map.
Summary:
It is hard to measure acutal memory usage by std containers. Even
providing a custom allocator will miss count some of the usage. Here we
only do a wild guess on its memory usage.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1511

Differential Revision: D4179945

Pulled By: yiwu-arbug

fbshipit-source-id: 32ab929
2016-11-15 20:24:13 -08:00
Baraa Hamodi
21e95811d1 Updated all copyright headers to the new format. 2016-02-09 15:12:00 -08:00
sdong
f9728640f3 "make format" against last 10 commits
Summary: This helps Windows port to format their changes, as discussed. Might have formatted some other codes too becasue last 10 commits include more.

Test Plan: Build it.

Reviewers: anthony, IslamAbdelRahman, kradhakrishnan, yhchiang, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: leveldb, dhruba

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D41961
2015-07-13 13:50:18 -07:00
Dmitri Smirnov
ef4b87f1b2 Commit both PR and internal code review changes 2015-07-07 16:58:20 -07:00
Dmitri Smirnov
18285c1e2f Windows Port from Microsoft
Summary: Make RocksDb build and run on Windows to be functionally
 complete and performant. All existing test cases run with no
 regressions. Performance numbers are in the pull-request.

 Test plan: make all of the existing unit tests pass, obtain perf numbers.

 Co-authored-by: Praveen Rao praveensinghrao@outlook.com
 Co-authored-by: Sherlock Huang baihan.huang@gmail.com
 Co-authored-by: Alex Zinoviev alexander.zinoviev@me.com
 Co-authored-by: Dmitri Smirnov dmitrism@microsoft.com
2015-07-01 16:13:56 -07:00
Igor Canadi
7f47ba0e26 Fix possible SIGSEGV in CompactRange (github issue #596)
Summary: For very detailed explanation of what's happening read this: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/596

Test Plan: make check + new unit test

Reviewers: yhchiang, anthony, rven

Reviewed By: rven

Subscribers: adamretter, dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D37779
2015-04-29 10:52:31 -07:00
Yueh-Hsuan Chiang
1a8f4821a7 Replace exception by assertion in autovector
Summary: Replace exception by assertion in autovector

Test Plan: autovector_test

Reviewers: sdong, igor

Reviewed By: igor

Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D29847
2014-12-04 11:41:56 -08:00
Jonah Cohen
f611935e9a Fix autovector iterator increment/decrement comments
Summary: The prefix and postfix operators were mixed up in the autovector class.

Test Plan: Inspection

Reviewers: sdong, kailiu

Reviewed By: kailiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D21873
2014-08-14 14:56:11 -07:00
Igor Canadi
af7453a673 autovector::resize
Summary: Resize the autovector!

Test Plan: test

Reviewers: sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D18543
2014-05-08 13:50:49 -07:00
Igor Canadi
588bca2020 RocksDBLite
Summary:
Introducing RocksDBLite! Removes all the non-essential features and reduces the binary size. This effort should help our adoption on mobile.

Binary size when compiling for IOS (`TARGET_OS=IOS m static_lib`) is down to 9MB from 15MB (without stripping)

Test Plan: compiles :)

Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, ljin, sdong, yhchiang

Reviewed By: yhchiang

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D17835
2014-04-15 13:39:26 -07:00
Kai Liu
774ed89c24 Replace vector with autovector
Summary: this diff only replace the cases when we need to frequently create vector with small amount of entries. This diff doesn't aim to improve performance of a specific area, but more like a small scale test for the autovector and see how it works in real life.

Test Plan:
make check

I also ran the performance tests, however there is no performance gain/loss. All performance numbers are pretty much the same before/after the change.

Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, igor

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14985
2014-01-02 16:43:35 -08:00
Kai Liu
b40c052bfa Fix all the comparison issue in fb dev servers 2013-12-26 16:13:49 -08:00
kailiu
c01676e46d Implement autovector
Summary:
A vector that leverages pre-allocated stack-based array to achieve better
performance for array with small amount of items.

Test Plan:
Added tests for both correctness and performance

Here is the performance benchmark between vector and autovector

Please note that in the test "Creation and Insertion Test", the test case were designed with the motivation described below:

* no element inserted: internal array of std::vector may not really get
  initialize.
* one element inserted: internal array of std::vector must have
  initialized.
* kSize elements inserted. This shows the most time we'll spend if we
  keep everything in stack.
* 2 * kSize elements inserted. The internal vector of
  autovector must have been initialized.

Note: kSize is the capacity of autovector

  =====================================================
  Creation and Insertion Test
  =====================================================
  created 100000 vectors:
  	each was inserted with 0 elements
  	total time elapsed: 128000 (ns)
  created 100000 autovectors:
  	each was inserted with 0 elements
  	total time elapsed: 3641000 (ns)
  created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
  	each was inserted with 0 elements
  	total time elapsed: 9896000 (ns)
  -----------------------------------
  created 100000 vectors:
  	each was inserted with 1 elements
  	total time elapsed: 11089000 (ns)
  created 100000 autovectors:
  	each was inserted with 1 elements
  	total time elapsed: 5008000 (ns)
  created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
  	each was inserted with 1 elements
  	total time elapsed: 24271000 (ns)
  -----------------------------------
  created 100000 vectors:
  	each was inserted with 4 elements
  	total time elapsed: 39369000 (ns)
  created 100000 autovectors:
  	each was inserted with 4 elements
  	total time elapsed: 10121000 (ns)
  created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
  	each was inserted with 4 elements
  	total time elapsed: 28473000 (ns)
  -----------------------------------
  created 100000 vectors:
  	each was inserted with 8 elements
  	total time elapsed: 75013000 (ns)
  created 100000 autovectors:
  	each was inserted with 8 elements
  	total time elapsed: 18237000 (ns)
  created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
  	each was inserted with 8 elements
  	total time elapsed: 42464000 (ns)
  -----------------------------------
  created 100000 vectors:
  	each was inserted with 16 elements
  	total time elapsed: 102319000 (ns)
  created 100000 autovectors:
  	each was inserted with 16 elements
  	total time elapsed: 76724000 (ns)
  created 100000 VectorWithReserveSizes:
  	each was inserted with 16 elements
  	total time elapsed: 68285000 (ns)
  -----------------------------------
  =====================================================
  Sequence Access Test
  =====================================================
  performed 100000 sequence access against vector
  	size: 4
  	total time elapsed: 198000 (ns)
  performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
  	size: 4
  	total time elapsed: 306000 (ns)
  -----------------------------------
  performed 100000 sequence access against vector
  	size: 8
  	total time elapsed: 565000 (ns)
  performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
  	size: 8
  	total time elapsed: 512000 (ns)
  -----------------------------------
  performed 100000 sequence access against vector
  	size: 16
  	total time elapsed: 1076000 (ns)
  performed 100000 sequence access against autovector
  	size: 16
  	total time elapsed: 1070000 (ns)
  -----------------------------------

Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, chip

Reviewed By: dhruba

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D14655
2013-12-26 15:03:47 -08:00