Summary:
Use inlined hash functions instead of function pointer. Make number of buckets a power of two and use bitwise and instead of mod.
After these changes, we get almost 50% improvement in performance.
Results:
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.231us (4.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.229us (4.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.185us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.108us (9.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.103us (9.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.101us (9.9 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.100us (10.0 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.097us (10.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 120000000 items, utilization is 89.41%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.102us (9.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.098us (10.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.115us (8.7 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.201us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.155us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.152us (6.6 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.089us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.084us (11.9 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.086us (11.6 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.087us (11.5 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.085us (11.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.093us (10.8 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.094us (10.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.094us (10.7 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.093us (10.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items, utilization is 74.51%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.092us (10.9 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.089us (11.2 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.088us (11.3 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.154us (6.5 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.168us (6.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.190us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.081us (12.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.083us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.7 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.076us (13.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.072us (13.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.072us (13.8 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 80000000 items, utilization is 59.60%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.074us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.190us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.186us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
Time taken per op is 0.184us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.079us (12.7 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.070us (14.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10
Time taken per op is 0.072us (14.0 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.072us (14.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
Time taken per op is 0.071us (14.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.082us (12.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.071us (14.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
Time taken per op is 0.073us (13.6 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 70000000 items, utilization is 52.15%, number of hash functions: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.080us (12.5 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.077us (13.0 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Time taken per op is 0.078us (12.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Test Plan:
make check all
make valgrind_check
make asan_check
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22539
Summary: This implements a cache friendly version of Cuckoo Hash in which, in case of collission, we try to insert in next few locations. The size of the neighborhood to check is taken as an input parameter in builder and stored in the table.
Test Plan:
make check all
cuckoo_table_{db,reader,builder}_test
Reviewers: sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22455
Summary:
- New Uint64 comparator
- Modify Reader and Builder to take custom user comparators instead of bytewise comparator
- Modify logic for choosing unused user key in builder
- Modify iterator logic in reader
- test changes
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_{builder,reader,db}_test
make check all
Reviewers: ljin, sdong
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: dhruba, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22377
Summary:
- Implement Prepare method
- Rewrite performance tests in cuckoo_table_reader_test to write new file only if one doesn't already exist.
- Add performance tests for batch lookup along with prefetching.
Test Plan:
./cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
Results (We get better results if we used int64 comparator instead of string comparator (TBD in future diffs)):
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.208us (4.8 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.182us (5.5 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.161us (6.2 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.161us (6.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.500000, number of hash functions used: 2.
Time taken per op is 0.163us (6.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.252us (4.0 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.192us (5.2 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.195us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.191us (5.2 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.600000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.194us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.228us (4.4 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.185us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.186us (5.4 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.189us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.750000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.188us (5.3 Mqps) with batch size of 100
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.325us (3.1 Mqps) with batch size of 0
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.196us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 10
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.199us (5.0 Mqps) with batch size of 25
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.196us (5.1 Mqps) with batch size of 50
With 100000000 items and hash table ratio 0.900000, number of hash functions used: 3.
Time taken per op is 0.209us (4.8 Mqps) with batch size of 100
Reviewers: sdong, yhchiang, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D22167
Summary:
Add a DB Property "rocksdb.estimate-table-readers-mem" to return estimated memory usage by all loaded table readers, other than allocated from block cache.
Refactor the property codes to allow getting property from a version, with DB mutex not acquired.
Test Plan: Add several checks of this new property in existing codes for various cases.
Reviewers: yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: xjin, igor, leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20733
Summary:
- Maintain a list of key-value pairs as vectors during Add operation.
- Start building hash table only when Finish() is called.
- This approach takes more time and space but avoids taking file_size, key and value lengths.
- Rewrote cuckoo_table_builder_test
I did not know about IterKey while writing this diff. I shall change places where IterKey could be used instead of std::string tomorrow. Please review rest of the logic.
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
cuckoo_table_builder_test
valgrind_check
asan_check
Reviewers: sdong, igor, yhchiang, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20907
Summary:
- Reads key-value pairs from file and builds an in-memory index of key-to-bucket id map in sorted order of key.
- Assumes bytewise comparator for sorting keys.
- Test changes
Test Plan:
cuckoo_table_reader_test --enable_perf
valgrind_check
asan_check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb, igor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20721
Summary: Made some small changes to fix the broken mac build
Test Plan: make check all in both linux and mac. All tests pass.
Reviewers: sdong, igor, ljin, yhchiang
Reviewed By: ljin, yhchiang
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20895
Summary:
Contains:
- Implementation of TableReader based on Cuckoo Hashing
- Unittests for CuckooTableReader
- Performance test for TableReader
Test Plan:
make cuckoo_table_reader_test
./cuckoo_table_reader_test
make valgrind_check
make asan_check
Reviewers: yhchiang, sdong, igor, ljin
Reviewed By: ljin
Subscribers: leveldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D20511
